Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T15:43:02.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimizing the clipping frequency and nitrogen topdressing in a dual-purpose oat used for fodder and cover cropping

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2022

Kudzayi Janhi
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Fort Hare, P. Bag X1314, 1 King William’s Road, Alice 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa
Cornelius Chiduza
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Fort Hare, P. Bag X1314, 1 King William’s Road, Alice 5700, Eastern Cape, South Africa
John Mupangwa
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Namibia, Neudamm Campus, P Bag 13188, Windhoek, Namibia
Lindah Muzangwa*
Affiliation:
Unit for Environmental Sciences & Management, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Management strategies such as nitrogen (N) topdressing and clipping can be used to optimize a cover crop for the dual purpose of soil cover and forage. The present study tested oat (Avena sativa) for a holistic provision of soil cover and forage under various levels of clipping frequency and N topdressing. Effects on root and above-ground biomass, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and crude protein (CP) were evaluated. Clipping frequency had four levels, namely clipped only at termination (C1), clipped at 28 days after emergence (DAE) and termination (C2), clipped at 28, 42 DAE, and termination (C3), and clipped at 28, 42, 56 DAE, and termination (C4). Nitrogen topdressing had two levels, namely with (N1) and without (N0) the recommended N topdressing. Increasing clipping frequency reduced the root and aerial biomass and did not affect the forage quality harvested before termination. However, N topdressing increased biomass and CP content across the clipping frequencies. Results suggest clipping thrice combined with N topdressing (C4 + N1) provides the best option to satisfy both soil cover and livestock demands. The treatment (C4 + N1) gave > 2 t ha−1 of biomass during the growing period and 6 t ha−1 at termination which can be used for livestock forage and soil cover, respectively. Clipping thrice without N topdressing (C4 + N0) was the best option for resource-constrained farmers.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Crop production and livestock rearing are an integral part of smallholder (SH) farmers’ livelihoods in the central Eastern Cape (EC) of South Africa (Muzangwa et al., Reference Muzangwa, Mnkeni and Chiduza2017; Rusere et al., Reference Rusere, Crespo, Dicks, Mkuhlani, Francis and Zhou2019). Maize (Zea mays L.) is the common crop of choice for the SH farmers. The grain is used for human consumption, while the residues and part of the grain are used for livestock feed, supplementing natural forages (Rusere et al., Reference Rusere, Crespo, Dicks, Mkuhlani, Francis and Zhou2019). Despite the high reliance on maize production by the SH farmers, maize yields obtained are low (Rusere et al., Reference Rusere, Crespo, Dicks, Mkuhlani, Francis and Zhou2019). The low maize production is linked to the inherently low fertility status of the soils (Mandiringana et al., Reference Mandiringana, Mnkeni, Mkile, Van Averbeke and Verplancke2005), low fertilizer input system practised by the SH farmers, low rainfall reliability, high soil erosion rates, and inability to fight weeds (Manyevere et al., Reference Manyevere, Muchaonyerwa, Laker and Mnkeni2014). A study by Mandiringana et al. (Reference Mandiringana, Mnkeni, Mkile, Van Averbeke and Verplancke2005) reported that 60% of the EC soils have low pH (<5.0), organic carbon (<10 g kg−1), K (<80 mg kg−1), Ca (<800 mg kg−1), and P (<5 mg kg−1). In addition, soils are normally left bare during the winter seasons, further exposing the soils to nutrient loss through wind and water-related erosion.

In view of this, it can be suggested that strategies that address both soil degradation and forage shortages are key for the SH systems. Cover cropping is a practice that can reduce soil erosion, promotes weed suppression, and increases rainfall infiltration and water conservation in the short term (Hontoria et al., Reference Hontoria, García-González, Quemada, Roldánd and Alguacil2019; MacLaren et al., Reference MacLaren, Swanepoel, Bennett, Wright and Dehnen-Schmutz2019). In the long term, cover cropping benefits include increased soil organic carbon (SOC) (Turmel et al., Reference Turmel, Speratti, Baudron, Verhulst and Govaerts2015). However, the adoption of cover cropping under the SH systems has failed due to insufficient residue biomass provided to the soil resulting in insignificant benefits from the practice (Muzangwa et al., Reference Muzangwa, Mnkeni and Chiduza2017). Available crop residues are prioritized for livestock feed rather than soil cover purposes (Tittonell et al., Reference Tittonell, Gérard and Erenstein2015). To that end, it can be proposed that introducing high biomass yielding cover crops adapted to the central EC winter climate, such as oat, can alleviate maize production. Furthermore, if sufficient biomass residue is applied to the soil, livestock forage demands are met. The ability of oat to regrow when clipped further makes it a good candidate cover crop to use under the SH farming systems.

Limited studies have proposed management strategies for using oat for the function of providing residue for both soil cover and livestock forage. However, research suggests that biomass residue of 2 t ha−1 is the lowest benchmark to realize cover cropping benefits (Choudhary et al., Reference Choudhary, Rana, Meena, Bana, Jakhar, Ghasal and Verma2018; Ranaivoson et al., Reference Ranaivoson, Naudin, Ripoche, Affholder, Rabeharisoa and Corbeels2017). On the other hand, the research evidence on the use of oat for livestock feed purposes provides discrepancies on the recommended clipping frequencies to obtain high and quality biomass. For instance, Kumar et al. (Reference Kumar, Singh, Gupta and Ravinder2017) suggested that higher cumulative biomass is obtained when oat is clipped once at 50% flowering as compared to when it is clipped twice at 60 days after sowing (DAS) and at 50% flowering. Contrary to these findings, Alipatra et al. (Reference Alipatra, Kundu, Bandopadhyay, Berax and Banerjee2012) reported the highest cumulative biomass from oat clipped twice, at 60 and 105 DAS, and lowest in oat clipped once, at 80 DAS. A plausible explanation for the discrepancies could be in the differences in the management of the N and environmental related factors in the reported experiments. Therefore, optimizing the clipping frequency for oat may be difficult without considering the N management and the climatic conditions of the EC province.

Apart from high biomass, forage quality is of importance in developing the management strategies for a dual-purpose oat. However, the effect of periodic herbage removal through clipping on forage quality is still unclear and requires further investigation. According to Blezinger (Reference Blezinger1999), good quality forage should have a crude protein (CP) of above 8%; crude fiber, measured as acid detergent fiber (ADF) content and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content, should be below 45 and 65%, respectively. Alipatra et al. (Reference Alipatra, Kundu, Bandopadhyay, Berax and Banerjee2012) reported the highest CP in oat that was double clipped at 60 and 105 DAS compared to a single clipping at 80 DAS. Contrary to these findings, Kumar et al. (Reference Kumar, Singh, Gupta and Ravinder2017) reported higher CP in single-cut oat at 50% flowering than in double-cut oat at 60 DAS and 50% flowering. Research by Nirmal et al. (Reference Nirmal, Dudhade, Solanke, Gadakh, Bhakare, Hasure and Gore2016) and Tang et al. (Reference Tang, Yang, Chen, Ameen and Xie2018) suggest that N fertilizer enhances CP and decreases NDF and ADF content in forages.

Nonetheless, N fertilizer effects on supporting herbage regrowth following clipping are not well documented. Studies seem to suggest that the regrowth of clipped plants is supported by the non-structural carbohydrates (NSC) contained in plant reserves such as the roots and stolon (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Su, Li, Lang and Huang2018). However, the root’s response to herbage removal varies from one grass species to another (Mapfumo et al., Reference Mapfumo, Naeth, Baron, Dick and Chanasyk2002). This study was therefore done to investigate how oat responds to varying clipping frequencies and N topdressing and establish the feasibility of using oat for both livestock forage and soil cover. The specific objective was to evaluate the effects of clipping frequency and N fertilizer topdressing on oat root biomass, above-ground biomass, and forage quality.

Materials and Methods

The study employed a greenhouse pot experiment and a field trial. The greenhouse pot experiment studied the effects of clipping frequency and N fertilizer topdressing on oat root biomass, CP, and crude fiber (ADF and NDF). The field trial was carried out to investigate above-ground biomass build-up of oat as affected by the clipping frequency and N fertilizer topdressing.

Greenhouse Pot Experiment

Experimental site and design

The soil used in the greenhouse pot experiment was collected from the University of Fort Hare (UFH) Research Farm (32°46’15.8’’S and 26°50’52.3’’E) from a soil depth of 0–20 cm. The soil was air-dried for 72 hours, after which it was sieved through a 2 mm plate. To ensure homogeneity, the sieved soil was thoroughly mixed before any chemical analysis and experiment commencement. The soils are deep and of alluvial origin, classified as Haplic Cambisol (International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS) Working Group, 2006) with 64.2% sand, 16.0% silt, and 19.8% clay (Mandiringana et al., Reference Mandiringana, Mnkeni, Mkile, Van Averbeke and Verplancke2005). The soils were analyzed for pH in water using the pH meter (Crison Instruments, Alella, Spain) following procedures outlined in AgriLASA (2004). SOC was analyzed using the modified Walkley Black method following procedures outlined in the Agri-Laboratory Association of Southern Africa (AgriLASA, 2004) and total N was determined following the wet ashing procedure as outlined by Mnkeni and Gichangi (Reference Mnkeni and Gichangi2008). The soils had a pH of 5.2, SOC of 0.63%, and total N was 0.041%.

The pot experiment was done in a semi-controlled greenhouse, at the UFH Research Farm. Plastic pots containing 8 kg soil with a diameter by height of 15 cm × 30 cm were used. Clipping frequency had four levels, namely clipped only at termination (C1), clipped at 28 days after emergence (DAE) and termination (C2), clipped at 28, 42 DAE, and termination (C3), and clipped at 28, 42, 56 DAE, and termination (C4). On the other hand, N topdressing had two levels, namely with (N1) (25 kg N ha−1) and without (N0) (0 kg N ha−1). The experiment was laid in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with eight treatments per block, each replicated three times to give a total of 24 pots. All treatments designated to receive N (N1) were topdressed at 28 DAE; however, in treatments that had more than one clipping, N topdressing was split-applied in equal amounts after each clipping.

Agronomic practices

Three oat seeds of an early maturing cultivar producing tall stems, Pallinup (McLean, Reference McLean1995), were planted in each pot. Basal fertilizer 2:3:4 (30) was applied uniformly to all pots at a rate of 300 kg ha−1 at planting. The basal fertilizer supplied 20 kg N ha−1, 30 kg P ha−1, and 40 kg K ha−1. These rates translated to 80 mg N, 120 mg P, and 160 mg K pot−1, using the conversion factor of 1 ha equals 2 million kg of soil as stated by Mehlich (Reference Mehlich1972). Nitrogen topdressing was only applied after the first clipping, at 28 DAE. Treatments receiving N topdressing were supplied with LAN (28% N) to achieve a total N rate of 45 kg ha−1 (180 mg N pot−1) recommended by DAFF (2010). The pots were irrigated to field capacity every 48 hours. The experiment was terminated at 90 DAE and had reached 50% flowering.

Data collection

Forage biomass for quality testing was collected from clippings done at 28, 42, 56 DAE, and the termination stage. A stubble of 10 cm high above the ground was left at each clipping. Root samples for dry weight determination were collected only at the termination stage after saturating the pots with water for 24 hours, carefully washing out the soil under low pressure running water. Both the vegetative and root biomass were oven-dried at 65 °C until constant mass before further lab analysis and calculation of dry weights, respectively. Quality tests done on the forage samples include CP, NDF, and ADF. CP was determined after wet ashing the samples and converting the total N to CP using the equation: CP (g kg−1) = total N (g kg−1) × 6.25 as outlined by Mnkeni and Gichangi (Reference Mnkeni and Gichangi2008). NDF was determined after digestion of samples in a detergent solution, and the predominant residues analyzed were lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose. ADF was determined after digesting of samples in sulfuric acid solution, and the predominant residues were lignin and cellulose. The procedure for NDF and ADF was performed using ANKOM200 fiber analyser with 65 rotations per minute agitation (ANKOM Technology).

Field Experiment

Experimental site and design

The field study was carried out at the UFH Research Farm with similar location and soil description as described for the greenhouse pot experiment. The farm lies at an average altitude of 508 m above the sea level and has a warm temperate climate with an average annual rainfall of about 575 mm and an annual mean temperature of 18°C. The field experiment had similar treatments as described for the greenhouse pot experiment. The experiments was laid out in a RCBD with eight treatments that were replicated three times. The net plot size measured 5 m × 5.25 m. The experiment was repeated over the 2017 and 2018 winter seasons.

Agronomic practices

The field was ploughed, disked, and rotovated before planting in the winter of both 2017 and 2018. Planting was done on the 11th of May and the 5th of April in 2017 and 2018, respectively. The oat seed was hand-drilled at a rate of 100 kg ha−1 into furrows 0.3 m apart, as recommended by DAFF (2010). At planting, basal fertilizer 2:3:4 (30) + Zn+ was applied uniformly to all plots as was adopted for the greenhouse pot trial. All plots received similar amounts of rainfall and supplementary overhead irrigation (Table 1). No chemical weed or pest control was done in the experiments. Weeds were manually removed by hand hoeing in all the plots. After C1 treatment reached 50% flowering, the experiments were terminated. The experiments were terminated on the 9th of August 2017 and on the 4th of July 2018, respectively.

Table 1. Rainfall and irrigation water (mm) received during the 2017 and 2018 oat growing period at the University of Fort Hare farm

Data collection

Data for vegetative biomass accumulation were taken at 28, 42, 56 DAE, and the termination stage of the experiment. Two quadrats measuring 1 m × 1 m were randomly thrown into the plot, and all vegetative biomass that fell within the quadrat was clipped to leave a stubble that was 10 cm above the ground. Vegetative dry matter was determined as described for the pot experiment. Cumulative biomass was determined for each treatment by adding the biomass at each clipping and the termination stage.

Data analysis

All the collected data from both pot and field experiments were subjected to a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using JMP version 14.1 statistical package. The exception was the data on N topdressing effects on CP, ADF, and NDF collected before termination (C3 and C4) which was analyzed as a one-way ANOVA because of the N topdressing added after the first clipping (28 DAE). Cumulative biomass was calculated by summing up the yields from all the clippings. The seasonal data from the field experiment were first tested for homogeneity of variance using the F test, and the results showed that the variances were not homogeneous at p < 0.05. Therefore, the data for biomass accumulation for each season were analyzed separately. Mean separation was done using least significance difference (LSD) values from Tukey’s honest significance difference (HSD) test.

Results

Greenhouse experiment

Root biomass

The root biomass data from the pot experiment showed no significant (p > 0.05) interaction of the clipping frequency and N topdressing factors. Of the two factors, only clipping frequency significantly affected (p < 0.001) the root biomass while N topdressing did not (p > 0.05). The root biomass was greatest in C1 pots while C4 had the least and followed the order C1 > C3 ≥ C2 ≥ C4 (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Effect of clipping frequency on oat root biomass from a greenhouse experiment at the University of Fort Hare. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, LSD (0.05) 0.58. The standard error is 0.19. (C1 = clipped only at termination, C2 = clipped at 28 DAE [days after emergence] and termination, C3 = clipped at 28, 42 DAE, and termination, C4 = clipped at 28, 42, 56 DAE, and termination).

Forage quality during the growing period

In the first clipping (28 DAE), when treatment effects were not in place, the average CP, ADF, and NDF content was 3.16, 6.89, and 9.23 %, respectively. Data analysis on quality measurements done on later clippings before termination showed significant N topdressing effects on CP content (p < 0.05). The CP content both in C3 and C4 biomass was increased by N topdressing. However, N topdressing had no significant (p > 0.05) effects on NDF content but significantly lowered (p < 0.01) ADF in C3 (Table 2).

Table 2. Clipping frequency × N fertilization effects on CP, ADF, and NDF content (%) of oat forage measured during the growing season (before termination) from a greenhouse experiment at the University of Fort Hare

Means in columns indicated by the same letter are not significantly different at p = 0.05. N1 = with topdressing, N0 = without topdressing, C3 = clipped at 28, 42 DAE, and termination, C4 = clipped at 28, 42, 56 DAE, and termination, DAE = days after emergence, SD = standard deviation.

Forage quality at termination

The forage quality data at termination showed significant clipping frequency and N topdressing interaction effects on NDF (p < 0.05) but not with CP and ADF (p > 0.05). CP was only significantly increased by N topdressing (p < 0.05) and the highest CP content was in C3 + N1 (13.0%) and the least was in C2 + N0 (11.2%) (Table 3). The clipping frequency effect was observed with the ADF (p < 0.001). The highest ADF content was in C4 and the lowest was in C1. Treatments that did not receive N topdressing had an 8.5% higher mean ADF content compared to the treatments that received N topdressing with a mean ADF content of 28.8% (Table 3). The NDF data showed that while the N topdressing significantly reduced NDF in C4 compared to the non-application, it did not result in significant changes in C1, C2, and C3. The greatest NDF value was with the C4 + N0 while the least was with C1 + N1 (Table 3).

Table 3. Clipping frequency × N fertilization effects on CP, ADF, and NDF content (%) of oat forage measured at termination from a greenhouse experiment at the University of Fort Hare

Means followed by different lowercase letters in the same main effect are statistically different at p < 0.05. N1 = with topdressing, N0 = without topdressing, C1 = clipped only at termination, C2 = clipped at 28 DAE and termination, C3 = clipped at 28, 42 DAE, and termination, C4 = Clipped at 28, 42, 56 DAE, and termination, DAE = days after emergence, SD = standard deviation.

Field experiment

Biomass yield measured during the growing period

The ANOVA showed a significant improvement in biomass yield with N topdressing in C4 but not in C3. The results obtained are summarized in Table 4. Though C2 was not part of the ANOVA, as there were no N topdressing effects during the treatment clipping, the biomass yields were 0.63 t ha−1 and 0.60 t ha−1 for 2017 and 2018, respectively (results not presented).

Table 4. Clipping frequency × N fertilization effects on the biomass yield of oat harvested during the 2017 and 2018 growing periods from a field experiment at the University of Fort Hare farm

Means followed by different lowercase letters in the same column are statistically different at p < 0.05. N1 = with topdressing, N0 = without topdressing, C3 = clipped at 28, 42 DAE, and termination, C4 = clipped at 28, 42, 56 DAE, and termination, DAE = days after emergence, SD = standard deviation.

Biomass yield at termination

The interaction of clipping frequency and N topdressing was not significant (p > 0.05) on the biomass yield harvested at the termination stage in both years, 2017 and 2018. However, there were significant differences in the biomass yield of oat due to the main effects of clipping frequency (p < 0.001) and N topdressing (p < 0.001) in both seasons. Increasing the clipping frequency significantly decreased the biomass yield that was obtained at the termination stage (Table 5). Generally, in both seasons, oat which had received N topdressing had higher biomass yield under all clipping frequencies. The highest oat yield at the termination stage was in C1 + N1. This was followed by C2 + N1 and C4 + N0 which had the least biomass yield in both seasons (Table 5).

Table 5. Clipping frequency × N fertilization effects on the biomass yield of oat measured at termination in the 2017 and 2018 winter seasons from a field experiment at the University of Fort Hare farm

Means followed by different lowercase letters in the same main effect are statistically different at p < 0.05. N1 = with topdressing, N0 = without topdressing, C1 = clipped only at termination, C2 = clipped at 28 DAE and termination, C3 = clipped at 28, 42 DAE, and termination, C4 = clipped at 28, 42, 56 DAE, and termination, DAE = days after emergence, SD = standard deviation.

Cumulative biomass

An interaction (p < 0.001) between clipping frequency and N topdressing on the cumulative biomass yield in both winter seasons was observed. Although all N topdressed treatments had significantly higher biomass yield than non-topdressed, N topdressing effect was more pronounced in C4 as compared to other clipping frequencies in both seasons. In addition, the main effects of clipping frequency and N topdressing had significant (p < 0.001) effects on the cumulative oat biomass harvested, the trend was as observed with the biomass data at termination. In the 2017 season, the highest cumulative oat biomass was obtained in C1 + N1 and was comparable to C4 + N1 and C2 + N1. In the 2018 season, the highest cumulative oat biomass was in C1 + N1 and was comparable with C4 + N1 (Table 6).

Table 6. Clipping frequency × N fertilization effects on the cumulative biomass yield of oat harvested measured from a field experiment at the University of Fort Hare farm

Means followed by different lowercase letters in the same column are statistically different at p < 0.05. N1 = with topdressing, N0 = without topdressing, C1 = clipped only at termination, C2 = clipped at 28 DAE and termination, C3 = clipped at 28, 42 DAE, and termination, C4 = clipped at 28, 42, 56 DAE, and termination, DAE = days after emergence, SD = standard deviation.

Discussion

The study investigated the practicability of multi-clipping oat, so it serves a dual purpose of soil cover and livestock forage. Quick regrowth of the clipped oat is key in determining the amount of biomass production and hence its ability for multi-purpose. In such cases, plant roots play an important role in water and nutrient uptake to support regrowth (Ryan et al., Reference Ryan, Delhaize, Watt and Richardson2016). In this study, measured root biomass decreased with increased clipping frequency indicating a gradual depletion of plant carbohydrate reserve present in the roots as suggested by Janhi et al. (Reference Janhi, Matshaya, Chiduza and Muzangwa2020). According to Liu et al. (Reference Liu, Su, Li, Lang and Huang2018), roots form part of the reserve containing NSC, which are responsible for the regrowth of aerial biomass. Furthermore, Bloom (Reference Bloom1997) also stated that increasing clipping frequency disrupts the required C: N ratio that should be maintained, thereby inhibiting N uptake until the appropriate C: N ratio is restored. Therefore, the carbohydrates present in the plant reserve, such as in the roots, are channeled toward above-ground biomass regrowth, rather than toward root expansion.

The observed reduction in biomass with increased clipping frequencies was consistent with findings from a similar experiment with forage sorghum as a test crop (Janhi et al., Reference Janhi, Matshaya, Chiduza and Muzangwa2020). The reduction in biomass is linked to the increased period of recovery with increased clipping frequencies. According to Ferraro and Oesterheld (Reference Ferraro and Oesterheld2002), the recovery period allows for the growth of vegetative structures such as leaves, as well as increasing plant height. In furtherance, the removal of aerial biomass puts a strain on the development and efficiency of the root system to absorb and take up nutrients and water to support active growth (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Su, Li, Lang and Huang2018). However, the results from the current study point to the importance of N topdressing in ensuring quick recovery after clippings. Nitrogen is involved in the development of vegetative structures, and this can explain the higher yields obtained under N topdressed treatments compared to the non-topdressed.

Besides increasing the biomass, N topdressing had far-reaching effects on the forage quality. This is largely due to the N being an integral part of protein synthesis, giving a plausible explanation for higher CP content in N topdressed oat compared to the non-topdressed. On the other hand, the decrease in CP content with increasing clipping frequency observed during the growing period can be attributed to a decrease in N uptake by the roots which occurs under limited carbon conditions. Similar findings were reported by Francia et al. (Reference Francia, Pecchioni, Nicosia, Paoletta, Taibi, Franco, Odoardi, Stanca and Delogu2006) who stated that higher CP values were observed in oat that was clipped once as compared to when it was clipped twice. However, these results differ from the findings of Alipatra et al. (Reference Alipatra, Kundu, Bandopadhyay, Berax and Banerjee2012) who reported significantly higher CP content in treatments that were clipped twice as compared to treatments that were clipped only once.

The resulting insignificant effects of supplementary N on crude fiber content during the growing period were also reported by Eltelib et al. (Reference Eltelib, Hamad and Ali2006). The sharp rise in NDF by C4 + N0 suggests that increasing clipping frequency under limited N soils raises NDF content in oat. However, contrary to these findings, Kumar and Chaplot (Reference Kumar and Chaplot2015) reported increased crude fiber with an increase in N application, while Ayub et al. (Reference Ayub, Nadeem, Tahir, Ibrahim and Aslam2009) reported that N did not affect forage crude fiber. The accepted ranges of crude fiber are ADF > 45% and NDF 65% (Blezinger, Reference Blezinger1999). In this study, all the ADF and NDF values observed in both cover crops during the growing season and at termination fit within these ranges.

The biomass yields at termination obtained under all clipping frequencies were above the minimum threshold value (2 t ha−1) for cover cropping benefits such as reduced water runoff, erosion, water infiltration, and retention (Choudhary et al., Reference Choudhary, Rana, Meena, Bana, Jakhar, Ghasal and Verma2018; Findeling et al., Reference Findeling, Roy and Scopel2003; Ranaivoson et al., Reference Ranaivoson, Naudin, Ripoche, Affholder, Rabeharisoa and Corbeels2017; Scopel et al., Reference Scopel, Findeling, Guerra and Corbeel2005). The difference between the cumulative biomass and the biomass yield at termination across the two seasons provided an indication of possible biomass levels that could be used for livestock feed purposes. The results suggest that treatment C4 + N1 can be considered for the dual purpose as it produced the highest biomass (2.4 t ha−1) for forage purposes and also had a high biomass yield at the termination stage (6 t ha−1). The greenhouse experiments showed that the forage quality of C4 + N1 fell within the recommended quality range for livestock forage. However, resource-constrained farmers can adopt C4 + N0, which gave 1.7 t ha−1 biomass yield for forage purposes during the growing period and 5.8 t ha−1 at the termination stage. Forage quality of C4 + N0 falls within the required range; therefore, a further 3.8 t ha−1 can be removed from the dry matter harvested at the termination stage and be fed to livestock.

Conclusions

The study showed that oat can be used for the dual purpose of soil cover and livestock forage purpose. The best treatment combination to achieve this win-win situation is when the oat is clipped thrice during the growing season, with N topdressing after each successive clipping (C4 + N1). This treatment combination supplies the minimum required biomass yield, 2 t ha−1, for soil cover and a further 6.4 t ha−1 biomass yield can be directed to livestock forage. It can further be suggested that resource-poor farmers adopt C4 + N0 treatment combination and supplement it with locally available livestock manure.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa and the Govan Mbeki Research and Development Center (GMRDC) for funding this research.

References

Agri Laboratory Association of Southern Africa (AgriLASA). (2004). Handbook of Standard Soil Testing Methods for Advisory Purposes. Volume 22, Pretoria, South Africa: Soil Science Society of South Africa, pp. 1–109.Google Scholar
Alipatra, A., Kundu, C.K., Bandopadhyay, P., Berax, P.S. and Banerjee, H. (2012). Growth, yield and quality of fodder oat (Avena sativa L.) as affected by split application of fertilizer and cutting management. Crop Research 43: 234237.Google Scholar
Ayub, M., Nadeem, M.A., Tahir, M., Ibrahim, M. and Aslam, M.N. (2009). Effect of nitrogen application and harvesting intervals on forage yield and quality of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.). Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences 7: 185187.Google Scholar
Blezinger, S. (1999). Developing sound forage analyses a program. Available at http://www.cattletoday.com/archive/1999/September/Cattle_Today20.shtml (accessed 20–21 June 2016).Google Scholar
Bloom, A.J. (1997). Nitrogen as a limiting factor: crop acquisition of ammonium and nitrate, in ecology in agriculture. In Louise E. Jackson (ed.), Ecology in Agriculture. San Diego, USA: Academic Press, pp. 145172.Google Scholar
Choudhary, M., Rana, K.S., Meena, M.C., Bana, R.S., Jakhar, P., Ghasal, P.C. and Verma, R.K. (2018). Changes in physico-chemical and biological properties of soil under conservation agriculture based pearl millet – mustard cropping system in rain fed semi-arid region. Journal Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 65: 911927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eltelib, H.A., Hamad, M.A. and Ali, E.E. (2006). The effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on growth, yield and quality of forage maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Agronomy 5: 515518.Google Scholar
Ferraro, D.O. and Oesterheld, M. (2002). Effect of defoliation on grass growth. A quantitative review. Oikos 98: 125133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findeling, A., Roy, S. and Scopel, E. (2003). Modeling the effects of a partial residue mulch on runoff using a physically based approach. Journal of Hydrology 275: 4966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francia, E., Pecchioni, N., Nicosia, O.L.D., Paoletta, G., Taibi, L., Franco, V., Odoardi, M., Stanca, A.M. and Delogu, G. (2006). Dual-purpose barley and oat in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research 99: 158166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hontoria, C., García-González, I., Quemada, M., Roldánd, A. and Alguacil, M.M. (2019). The cover crop determines the AMF community composition in soil and in roots of maize after a ten-year continuous crop rotation. Science of the Total Environment 660: 913922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IUSS Working Group WRB. (2006). World Reference Base for Soil Resources, 2nd Edn. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103; FAO: Rome, Italy. ISBN 92-5-105511-4.Google Scholar
Janhi, K., Matshaya, Z., Chiduza, C. and Muzangwa, L. (2020). Clipping forage sorghum twice and nitrogen topdressing offer an option for dual-purpose use for cover cropping and fodder in mixed crop/livestock farming. Agronomy 10, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, B.S., Singh, R.V., Gupta, A.K. and Ravinder, J. (2017). Effect of nitrogen levels and cutting management on green forage yield of fodder oat (Avena sativa L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6: 635637.Google Scholar
Kumar, D. and Chaplot, P.C. (2015). Effect of fertility levels on quality of multi-cut forage sorghum genotypes. Forage Research 40: 25253.Google Scholar
Liu, W., Su, J., Li, S., Lang, X. and Huang, X. (2018). Non-structural carbohydrates regulated by season and species in the subtropical monsoon broadleaved evergreen forest of Yunnan Province. China. Scientific Reports 8: 1083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLaren, C., Swanepoel, P., Bennett, J., Wright, J. and Dehnen-Schmutz, K. (2019). Cover crop biomass production is more important than diversity for weed suppression. Crop Science 59: 733748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, R. (1995). Register of Australian winter cereal cultivars. Avena sativa (oats) cv. Pallinup. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35: 426426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandiringana, O.T., Mnkeni, P.N.S., Mkile, Z., Van Averbeke, W. and Verplancke, H. (2005). Mineralogy and fertility status of selected soils of the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 36: 24312446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manyevere, A., Muchaonyerwa, P., Laker, M.C. and Mnkeni, P.N.S. (2014). Farmers’ perspectives with regard to crop production: an analysis of Nkonkobe municipality, South Africa. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics 115: 4153.Google Scholar
Mapfumo, E., Naeth, M.A., Baron, V.S., Dick, A.C. and Chanasyk, D.S. (2002). Grazing impacts on litter and roots: perennial versus annual grasses. Journal of Range Management 5: 1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehlich, A. (1972). Uniformity of expressing soil test results. A case for calculating results on a volume basis. Communications of Soil Science and Plant Analysis 3: 417424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mnkeni, P.N.S. and Gichangi, E.M. (2008). A Practical Teaching Manual for Plant Analysis. South Africa: University of Fort Hare, Faculty of Science and Agriculture, Department of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Muzangwa, L., Mnkeni, P.N.S. and Chiduza, C. (2017). Assessment of conservation agriculture practices by smallholder farmers in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. Agronomy Journal 7: 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy7030046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nirmal, S.S., Dudhade, D.D., Solanke, A.V., Gadakh, S.R., Bhakare, B.D., Hasure, R.R. and Gore, S.B. (2016). Effect of nitrogen levels on growth and yield of forage sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (l.) moench] varieties. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology 5: 29993004.Google Scholar
Ranaivoson, L., Naudin, K., Ripoche, A., Affholder, F., Rabeharisoa, L. and Corbeels, M. (2017). Agroecological functions of crop residues under conservation agriculture. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 37: 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusere, F., Crespo, O., Dicks, L., Mkuhlani, S., Francis, J. and Zhou, L. (2019). Enabling acceptance and use of ecological intensification options through engaging smallholder farmers in semi-arid rural Limpopo and Eastern Cape, South Africa. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 44: 696725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, R.P., Delhaize, E., Watt, M. and Richardson, E.A. (2016). Plant roots: understanding structure and function in an ocean of complexity. Annals of Botany 118: 555559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scopel, E., Findeling, A., Guerra, E.C. and Corbeel, M. (2005). Impact of direct sowing mulch-based cropping systems on soil carbon, soil erosion and maize yield. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 25: 425432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, C., Yang, X., Chen, X., Ameen, A. and Xie, G. (2018). Sorghum biomass and quality and soil nitrogen balance response to nitrogen rate on semiarid marginal land. Field Crops Research 215: 1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tittonell, P., Gérard, B. and Erenstein, O. (2015). Tradeoffs around crop residue biomass in smallholder croplivestock systems – what’s next? Agricultural Systems 134: 119128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turmel, M., Speratti, A., Baudron, F., Verhulst, N. and Govaerts, B. (2015). Crop residue management and soil health: a systems analysis. Agriculture Systems 134: 616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Rainfall and irrigation water (mm) received during the 2017 and 2018 oat growing period at the University of Fort Hare farm

Figure 1

Figure 1. Effect of clipping frequency on oat root biomass from a greenhouse experiment at the University of Fort Hare. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, LSD (0.05) 0.58. The standard error is 0.19. (C1 = clipped only at termination, C2 = clipped at 28 DAE [days after emergence] and termination, C3 = clipped at 28, 42 DAE, and termination, C4 = clipped at 28, 42, 56 DAE, and termination).

Figure 2

Table 2. Clipping frequency × N fertilization effects on CP, ADF, and NDF content (%) of oat forage measured during the growing season (before termination) from a greenhouse experiment at the University of Fort Hare

Figure 3

Table 3. Clipping frequency × N fertilization effects on CP, ADF, and NDF content (%) of oat forage measured at termination from a greenhouse experiment at the University of Fort Hare

Figure 4

Table 4. Clipping frequency × N fertilization effects on the biomass yield of oat harvested during the 2017 and 2018 growing periods from a field experiment at the University of Fort Hare farm

Figure 5

Table 5. Clipping frequency × N fertilization effects on the biomass yield of oat measured at termination in the 2017 and 2018 winter seasons from a field experiment at the University of Fort Hare farm

Figure 6

Table 6. Clipping frequency × N fertilization effects on the cumulative biomass yield of oat harvested measured from a field experiment at the University of Fort Hare farm