Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:10:10.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ON-FARM ASSESSMENT OF CONSTRAINTS TO CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM) PRODUCTION IN MARGINAL AREAS OF NORTHERN AUSTRALIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2007

J. P. M. WHISH
Affiliation:
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Agricultural Production Systems Research Unit, PO Box 102, Toowoomba Qld 4350, Australia and Michael Castor and Associates, 58 Marshall St Goondiwindi Qld 4390, Australia
P. CASTOR
Affiliation:
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Agricultural Production Systems Research Unit, PO Box 102, Toowoomba Qld 4350, Australia and Michael Castor and Associates, 58 Marshall St Goondiwindi Qld 4390, Australia
P. S. CARBERRY
Affiliation:
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Agricultural Production Systems Research Unit, PO Box 102, Toowoomba Qld 4350, Australia and Michael Castor and Associates, 58 Marshall St Goondiwindi Qld 4390, Australia
A. S. PEAKE
Affiliation:
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Agricultural Production Systems Research Unit, PO Box 102, Toowoomba Qld 4350, Australia and Michael Castor and Associates, 58 Marshall St Goondiwindi Qld 4390, Australia

Abstract

Chickpea production in marginal (<600 mm annual rainfall) areas of the northern cropping region in eastern Australia is considered to be constrained by low rainfall, soils with low plant available water capacity (PAWC), subsoil salinity, low plant stature and poor fruit set. This study examines these constraints to assess the magnitude of their impact and if agronomic practices can improve potential production. Over three years a total of 42 commercial chickpea crops were monitored following a participatory action research approach focusing on perceived production constraints. Subsoil salinity significantly reduced PAWC for chickpea compared to wheat. However, PAWC for chickpeas from the majority of sites monitored was comparable to other areas. The supply of water between flowering and maturity was significantly related to yield. The agronomic practice of levelling following deep planting improved the lowest pod height by 10 cm and plant stresses experienced during flowering caused a 50 % loss of potential fruit. Constraints impacting on the supply and storage of soil water could be minimized by selecting paddocks with low chloride levels in the upper layers and sowing crops when the available soil water is greater than 100 mm. Reducing fruit loss at flowering has the potential to improve yields significantly. The mechanisms behind this loss were not identified but are worthy of further research.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)