Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:32:06.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nitrogen and trinexapac-ethyl effects on wheat grain yield, lodging and seed physiological quality in southern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2022

Lucas Pinto de Faria Open the ORCID record for Lucas Pinto de Faria [Opens in a new window] ,
Sérgio Ricardo Silva Open the ORCID record for Sérgio Ricardo Silva [Opens in a new window]  and
Rômulo Pisa Lollato Open the ORCID record for Rômulo Pisa Lollato [Opens in a new window]
Lucas Pinto de Faria
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, State University of Northern Paraná, BR 369, Km 54, Bandeirantes, PR86360-000, Brazil
Sérgio Ricardo Silva*
Affiliation:
National Wheat Research Centre (Embrapa Trigo), Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, PO Box 3081, Passo Fundo, RS99050-970, Brazil
Rômulo Pisa Lollato
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton Bld., 1712 Claflin Rd., Manhattan, KS66506, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Nitrogen (N) fertilization affects wheat yield and grain protein concentration; however, its mismanagement can increase plant lodging. While the use of plant growth regulators such as trinexapac-ethyl (TE) can mitigate plant lodging, their effects on seed physiological quality are not well known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of N fertilization and TE on wheat yield, lodging and seed quality of spring wheat varieties. It was carried out in the 2018 growing season in the environments of Londrina and Ponta Grossa, Brazil. A randomized complete block design was used with a 2 × 3 × 3 factorial arrangement to evaluate two wheat genotypes (WT 15008 and WT 15025), three top-dressing N rates (0, 40 and 120 kg ha−1), and three TE rates (0, 50 and 100 g ha−1). Agronomic characteristics related to wheat productivity (hectolitre weight, thousand-grain weight, density of fertile spikes, plant height, lodging and grain yield) and seed physiological quality (seed germination and vigour; length and dry matter of normal seedlings) were evaluated. Increasing N rates up to 120 kg ha−1 increased plant lodging up to 26.4 percentage points for WT 15025 in Londrina. TE impaired some traits of seed physiological quality. Spraying 100 g ha−1 TE on the plants reduced seedling length by 9.4% in the seeds of WT 15008 harvested in Ponta Grossa compared to the TE control (0 g ha−1). The dry matter of the seedlings from the seeds harvested in Londrina declined by 7.2% due to the application of 100 g ha−1 TE, compared to the control. However, a lower rate of TE (50 g ha−1) might be enough to minimize plant lodging without impairing the physiological quality of the seeds, depending on the rate of N fertilization. This study is the first step in providing empirical evidence for the detrimental effects of TE in combination with N on wheat seed quality, suggesting that seed producers should exercise caution in managing TE and N fertilization.

Keywords

Triticum aestivum L.plant growth regulatorsynthetic plant hormoneseed germinationseed vigour
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 58 , 2022 , e21
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelovici, R., Galili, G., Fernie, A.R. and Fait, A. (2010). Seed desiccation: a bridge between maturation and germination. Trends in Plant Science 15, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barányiová, I. and Klem, K. (2016). Effect of application of growth regulators on the physiological and yield parameters of winter wheat under water deficit. Plant, Soil and Environment 62, 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barros, A.S.R., Dias, M.C.L.L., Cicero, S.M. and Krzyzanowski, F.C. (1999). Cold tests, accelerated ageing test. In Krzyzanowski, F.C., Vieira, R.D. and França Neto, J.B. (eds), Seed vigor: concepts and tests. Londrina: ABRATES, pp. 5.11–5.12.Google Scholar
Beche, E., Benin, G., Bornhofen, E., Dalló, S.C., Sassi, L.H.S. and Oliveira, R. (2014). Nitrogen use efficiency of pioneer and modern wheat cultivars. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 49, 948–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, P.M., Sterling, M., Baker, C.J., Spink, J. and Sparkes, D.L. (2003). A calibrated model of wheat lodging compared with field measurements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 119, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, P.M., Sterling, M., Spink, J.H., Baker, C.J., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Mooney, S.J., Tams, A.R. and Ennos, A.R. (2004). Understanding and reducing lodging in cereals. Advances in Agronomy 84, 217–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borrás, L., Slafer, G.A. and Otegui, M.E. (2004). Seed dry weight response to source–sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal. Field Crops Research 86, 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRASIL (2009). Rules for seed analysis. Brasília: Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento–Secretaria de Defesa Agropecuária.Google Scholar
Comissão Brasileira de Pesquisa de Trigo e Triticale [CBPTT]. (2017). Technical information for wheat and triticale – 2017 crop season, Silva, S.R., Bassoi, M.C. and Foloni, J.S.S. (eds). Londrina: Embrapa Soja.Google Scholar
CONAB (2020). Historical series of crops – Wheat. Brasília: Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento.Google Scholar
CONAB (2021). Historical series of costs – Wheat. Brasília: Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento.Google Scholar
Corassa, G.M., Hansel, F.D., Lollato, R., Pires, J.L.F., Schwalbert, R., Amado, T.J.C., Guarienti, E.M., Gaviraghi, R., Bisognin, M.B., Reimche, G.B., Santi, A.L. and Ciampitti, I.A. (2018). Nitrogen management strategies to improve yield and dough properties in hard red spring wheat. Agronomy Journal 110, 2417–2429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossani, C.M. and Sadras, V.O. (2018). Water–nitrogen colimitation in grain crops. Advances in Agronomy 150, 231–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruppe, G., DeWolf, E., Jaenisch, B.R., Onofre, K.A., Valent, B., Fritz, A.K. and Lollato, R.P. (2021). Experimental and producer-reported data quantify the value of foliar fungicide to winter wheat and its dependency on genotype and environment in the U.S. central Great Plains. Field Crops Research 273, 108300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruz, C.D. (2013). Genes – a software package for analysis in experimental statistics and quantitative genetics. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy 35, 271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, E.G., O’Sullivan, C.A., Roper, M.M., Biggs, J.S. and Peoples, M.B. (2018). Influence of co-application of nitrogen with phosphorus, potassium and sulphur on the apparent efficiency of nitrogen fertiliser use, grain yield and protein content of wheat: Review. Field Crops Research 226, 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária [Embrapa] (2009). Development of cowpea cultivars adapted to the North, Northeast, and Midwest regions. Teresina: Embrapa Meio Norte. 12 p.Google Scholar
Espindula, M.C., Rocha, V.S., Souza, L.T., Souza, M.A. and Grossi, J.A.S. (2010). Effect of growth regulators on wheat stem elongation. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy 32, 109–116.Google Scholar
Espindula, M.C., Rocha, V.S., Grossi, J.A.S., Souza, M.A., Souza, L.T. and Favarato, L.F. (2009). Use of growth retardants in wheat. Planta Daninha 27, 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagerness, M.J. and Penner, D. (1998). Spray application parameters that influence the growth inhibiting effects of trinexapac-ethyl. Crop Science 38, 1028–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fagotti, D.S.L., Miyauchi, M.Y.H., Oliveira, A.G., Santinoni, I.A., Eberhardt, D.N., Nimtz, A., Ribeiro, R.A., Paula, A.M., Queiroz, C.A.S., Andrade, G., Zangaro, W. and Nogueira, M.A. (2012). Gradients in N-cycling attributes along forestry and agricultural land-use systems are indicative of soil capacity for N supply. Soil Use and Management 28, 292–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, L.A.R, Silva, S.R., Lollato, R.P., Ferreira, E.B. and Kölln, O.T. (2021). Wheat nitrogen utilization efficiency and yield as affected by nitrogen management and environmental conditions. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 33, 944–957.Google Scholar
Foloni, J.S.S., Bassoi, M.C. and Silva, S.R. (2016). Phytotechnical recommendations for Embrapa wheat cultivars in Paraná. Londrina: Embrapa Soja. (Circular técnica 117)Google Scholar
Guerreiro, R.M. and Oliveira, N.C. (2012). Grain yield of oat under different doses of trinexapac-ethy. Publicatio UEPG. Ciências Exatas e da Terra, Ciências Agrárias e Engenharia 7, 27–36.Google Scholar
Gustafson, D.J., Gibson, D.J. and Nickrent, D.L. (2004). Competitive relationships of Andropogon gerardii (Big Bluestem) from remnant and restored native populations and select cultivated varieties. Functional Ecology 18, 451–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, M.A., Ahmed, J.U., Hossain, T., Mian, M.A.K. and Haque, M.M. (2013). Evaluation of the physiological quality of wheat seed as influenced by high parent plant growth temperature. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology 16, 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, N.L., Elthon, T.E., Horst, G.L. and Gaussoin, R.E. (2002). Influence of trinexapac-ethyl on respiration of isolated wheat mitochondria. Crop Science 42, 423–427.Google Scholar
IUSS Working Group WRB (2015). World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014 – International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps (Update 2015). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. (World Soil Resources Reports, 106).Google Scholar
Jaenisch, B.R., Silva, A.O., DeWolf, E., Ruiz-Diaz, D.A. and Lollato, R.P. (2019). Plant population and fungicide economically reduced winter wheat yield gap in Kansas. Agronomy Journal 111, 650–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaspary, T.E., Lamego, F.P., Bela, C., Kulczynski, S.M. and Pitto, D. (2015). Growth regulator on yield and seed quality of oat. Planta Daninha 33, 739–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knott, C.A., Van Sanford, D.A., Ritchey, E.L. and Swiggart, E. (2016). Wheat yield response and plant structure following increased nitrogen rates and plant growth regulator applications in Kentucky. Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management 2, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Köppen, W. (1931). Outline of climate science. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lollato, R.P., Figueiredo, B.M., Dhillon, J.S., Arnall, D.B. and Raun, W.R. (2019). Wheat grain yield and grain-nitrogen relationships as affected by N, P, and K fertilization: a synthesis of long-term experiments. Field Crops Research 236, 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lollato, R.P., Jaenisch, B.R. and Silva, S.R. (2021). Genotype-specific nitrogen uptake dynamics and fertilizer management explain contrasting wheat protein concentration. Crop Science 61, 2048–2066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lozano, C.M. and Leaden, M.I. (2001). Novelties on the use of growth regulators in wheat. Buenos Aires: INTA–Jornadas de actualizacion Professional.Google Scholar
Maia, A.R., Lopes, J.C. and Teixeira, C.O. (2007). Effect of the accelerated aging in the evaluation of the physiological quality in wheat seeds. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 31, 678–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Andújar, C., Martin, R.C. and Nonogaki, H. (2012). Seed trait and genes important for translational biology – highlights from recent discoveries. Plant & Cell Physiology 53, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matysiak, K. (2006). Influence of trinexapac-ethyl on growth and development of winter wheat. Journal of Plant Protection Research 46, 133–143.Google Scholar
Mehta, Y.R. (2014). Wheat Diseases and Their Management. Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munaro, L.B., Hefley, T.J., DeWolf, E., Haley, S., Fritz, A.K., Zhang, G., Haag, L.A., Schlegel, A.J., Edwards, J.T., Marburger, D., Alderman, P., Jones-Diammond, S.M., Johnson, J., Lingenfelser, J.E., Unêda-Trevisoli, S.H. and Lollato, R.P. (2020). Exploring long-term variety performance trials to improve environment-specific genotype × management recommendations: a case-study for winter wheat. Field Crops Research 255, 107848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naegle, E.R., Burton, J.W., Carter, T.E. and Rufty, T.W. (2005). Influence of seed nitrogen content on seedling growth and recovery from nitrogen stress. Plant and Soil 271, 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakagawa, J. (1999). Vigor tests based on seedling performance. In Krzyzanowski, F.C., Vieira, R.D. and França Neto, J.B. (eds), Seed vigor: concepts and tests. Londrina: ABRATES, pp. 9–15.Google Scholar
Nitsche, P.R., Caramori, P.H., Ricce, W.S. and Pinto, L.F.D. (2019). Climatic Atlas of the State of Paraná. Londrina: Instituto Agronômico do Paraná.Google Scholar
Patrignani, A., Lollato, R.P., Ochsner, T.E., Godsey, C.B. and Edwards, J.T. (2014). Yield gap and production gap of rainfed winter wheat in the southern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 106, 1329–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peake, A.S., Bell, K.L., Carberry, P.S., Poole, N., and Raine, S.R. (2016). Vegetative nitrogen stress decreases lodging risk and increases yield of irrigated spring wheat in the subtropics. Crop and Pasture Science 67, 907–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peake, A.S., Bell, K.L., Fischer, R.A., Gardner, M., Das, B.T., Poole, N. and Mumford, M. (2020). Cultivar × management interaction to reduce lodging and improve grain yield of irrigated spring wheat: optimising plant growth regulator use, N application timing, row spacing and sowing date. Frontiers in Plant Science 11, 401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penckowski, L.H., Zagonel, J. and Fernandes, E.C. (2009). Nitrogen and growth reducer in high yield wheat. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy 31, 473–479.Google Scholar
Penckowski, L.H., Zagonel, J. and Fernandes, E.C. (2010). Industrial quality of wheat as a function of trinexapac-ethyl and nitrogen doses. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 34, 1492–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piñera-Chavez, F.J., Berry, P.M., Foulkes, M.J., Jesson, M.A. and Reynolds, M.P. (2016). Avoiding lodging in irrigated spring wheat. I. Stem and root structural requirements. Field Crops Research 196, 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto, J.G.C.P., Munaro, L.B., Jaenisch, B.R., Nagaoka, A.K. and Lollato, R.P. (2019). Wheat variety response to seed cleaning and treatment after fusarium head blight infection. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment 2, 190034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pumphrey, F.V. and Rubenthaler, G.L. (1983). Lodging effects on yield and quality of soft white wheat. Cereal Chemistry 60, 268–270.Google Scholar
Qin, R., Noulas, C., Wysocki, D., Liang, X., Wang, G. and Lukas, S. (2020). Application of plant growth regulators on soft white winter wheat under different nitrogen fertilizer scenarios in irrigated fields. Agriculture 10, 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, O., Didonet, A.D., Teixeira, M.C.C. and Roman, E.S. (2003). Growth reducers. Passo Fundo: Embrapa Trigo. (Circular Técnica 14)Google Scholar
Rolim, G.S., Sentelhas, P.C. and Barbieri, V. (1998). Spreadsheets in EXCELTM environment for water balance calculation: normal, sequential, culture, and real and potential yields. Revista Brasileira de Agrometeorologia 6, 133–137.Google Scholar
Santos, H.G., Jacomine, P.K.T., Anjos, L.H.C., Oliveira, V.A., Lumbreras, J.F., Coelho, M.R., Almeida, J.A., Cunha, T.J.F. and Oliveira, J.B. (2013). Brazilian system of soil classification. Brasília: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica.Google Scholar
Sibaldelli, R.N.R. and Farias, J.R.B. (2019). Agrometeorological bulletin of the Embrapa Soja, Londrina, PR - 2018. Londrina: Embrapa Soja. (Documentos 411)Google Scholar
Silva, C.L., Benin, G., Bornhofen, E., Todeschini, M.H., Dallo, S.C. and Sassi, L.H.S. (2014). Characterization of Brazilian wheat cultivars in terms of nitrogen use efficiency. Bragantia 73, 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slafer, G.A., Savin, R. and Sadras, V.O. (2014). Coarse and fine regulation of wheat yield components in response to genotype and environment. Field Crops Research 157, 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soil Survey Staff (2010). Keys to Soil Taxonomy. Washington: United States Department of Agriculture–Natural Resources Conservation Service.Google Scholar
Subedi, M., Karimi, R., Wang, Z., Graf, R.J., Mohr, R.M., O’Donovan, J.T., Brandt, S. and Beres, B.L. (2021). Winter cereal responses to dose and application timing of trinexapac-ethyl. Crop Science 61, 2722–2732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taiz, L. and Zeiger, E. (2010). Plant Physiology. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates Inc.Google Scholar
Thornthwaite, C.W. and Mather, J.R. (1955). The Water Balance. Centerton: Drexel Institute of Technology-Laboratory of Climatology.Google Scholar
USDA (2018). Brazil, Grain and Feed Update: Wheat Production Hampered by Dry Conditions and Sporadic Frosts, But Corn Output Set to Soar. Washington: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service–Global Agricultural Information Network.Google Scholar
Vieira, R.F. (2017). Nitrogen cycle in agricultural systems. Brasília: Embrapa.Google Scholar
Wei, J., Carroll, R.J., Harden, K.K. and Wu, G. (2012). Comparisons of treatment means when factors do not interact in two-factorial studies. Amino Acids 42, 2031–2035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, D., Xu, H., Xie, L., He, M., Hou, H., Wu, C., Li, Y. and Zhang, C. (2018). Effects of nitrogen level during seed production on wheat seed vigor and seedling establishment at the transcriptome level. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, 3417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiethölter, S. (2011). Soil fertility and wheat crop in Brazil. In Pires, J.L.F., Vargas, L. and Cunha, G.R. (eds), Wheat in Brazil: bases for competitive and sustainable production. Passo Fundo: Embrapa Trigo, pp. 135–185.Google Scholar
Yokoyama, A.H., Balbinot Junior, A.A., Ribeiro, R.H., Franchini, J.C., Debiasi, H. and Zucareli, C. (2019). Nitrate and ammonium content in the soil as a function of off-season crops and nitrogen fertilization in the soybean. Colloquium Agrariae 15, 77–87.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J.C., Chang, T.T. and Konzak, C.F.A. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagonel, J. and Fernandes, E.C. (2007). Rates and application times of growth reducer affecting wheat cultivars at two nitrogen rates. Planta Daninha 25, 331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagonel, J., Venancio, W.S. and Kunz, R.P. (2002). Effect of growth regulator on wheat crop under different nitrogen rates and plant densities. Planta Daninha 3, 471–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Faria et al. supplementary material

Table S1-S2

Download Faria et al. supplementary material(File)
File 23.4 KB