Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T07:00:12.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INTRODUCING AUTUMN SUGARCANE AS A RELAY INTERCROP IN SKIPPED ROW PLANTED RICE–POTATO CROPPING SYSTEM FOR ENHANCED PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFITABILITY IN THE INDIAN SUB-TROPICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2010

S. N. SINGH ,
R. L. YADAV ,
D. V. YADAV ,
P. R. SINGH  and
I. SINGH
S. N. SINGH*
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow-226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India
R. L. YADAV
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow-226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India
D. V. YADAV
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow-226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India
P. R. SINGH
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow-226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India
I. SINGH
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow-226 002, Uttar Pradesh, India
*
†Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Field experiments were conducted for the three consecutive cropping seasons of 2003–05, 2004–06 and 2005–07 at the Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research, Lucknow, India, to explore the feasibility of planting sugarcane in autumn as a relay intercrop in standing rice. The cropping systems evaluated were: i) rice-potato-spring sugarcane; ii) rice + autumn sugarcane (planted as a relay intercrop in every sixth row devoid (skipped) of transplanted rice + potato after rice; iii) rice-autumn sugarcane (planted without preparatory tillage) + potato; and iv) rice-autumn sugarcane (planted with preparatory tillage) + potato. In each case, sugarcane was planted in rows 90 cm apart. Rice was transplanted in rows at 20-cm row spacing when followed by potato or sugarcane, but at 18-cm row spacing when intended for sugarcane planting as a relay intercrop in late September. The germination (60.4%) of cane buds, tillers (323 000 ha−1) and number (149 000 ha−1), length (225 cm), girth (2.44 cm) and weight (747 g) of millable canes were markedly better when autumn sugarcane was planted with rice as a relay intercrop in comparison to other cropping systems. Similarly, this cropping system produced the maximum cane (111.4 t ha−1) and sugar (13.2 t ha−1) along with sugarcane equivalent yield (216.4 t ha−1). In turn, relay intercropping system with maximum cane production efficiency of 420 kg ha−1day−1 fetched the highest economic returns (Rs. 258 ha−1day−1) and benefit:cost ratio (1.5). Compared with the rice-potato-spring sugarcane cropping system, the relay intercrop of autumn sugarcane in standing rice produced 35.4% more cane and 38.3% more sugar with 24.1% higher returns besides 79.1% energy saving. This practice will not only benefit cane growers and sugar mill owners in tropical and sub-tropical India, but also in other parts of the world where rice and sugarcane are extensively cultivated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , October 2010 , pp. 519 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bachchhav, S. M. (2005). Fertigation technology for increasing sugarcane production. Indian Journal of Fertilizers 1: 85–89.Google Scholar
Chand, M., Lal, R., Khippal, A., Kumar, V. and Singh, R. (2007). Effect of reducing pre-planting tillage operations on sugarcane production and soil properties. Indian Journal of Sugarcane Technology 22: 18–20.Google Scholar
Clark, L. J., Whalley, W. R. and Baraclough, P. B. (2003). How do roots penetrate strong soil? Plant and Soil 255: 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. and Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs, 2nd edn., New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Cole, R. C. (1939). Soil macro-structure as affected by cultural treatments. Hilgardia 12: 427–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, T. K. (2002). Skip-row planting for higher photosynthetic efficiency. ICAR NEWS 8: 14.Google Scholar
Dhiman, S. D., Hari Om, and Kumar, H. (2001). Advantage and limitation of zero tillage in wheat. Indian Farming 51: 8–10.Google Scholar
Gupta, R. K. (2002). The Rice-Wheat Consortium for Indo-Gangetic Plains. Highlights 2001–2002, CIMMYT, Mexico.Google Scholar
Hamblin, A. P., Tennant, D. and Cochrane, H. (1982). Tillage and the growth of wheat crop in a loamy sand. Australian Journal of Soil Research 33: 887–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1973). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.Google Scholar
Jain, N. K. and Agrawal, J. P. (1970). Effect of clod size in the seed bed on the development and yield of sugarcane. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 34: 795–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, V., Singh, S., Yadav, A., Malik, R. K. and Hobbs, P. R. (2002). Studies on the effect of zero tillage in wheat on physico-chemical properties of soils in comparison to conventional tillage. Proceedings International Workshop on Herbicides Resistance Management and Zero Tillage in Rice-Wheat Cropping System, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, India, March 4–6, 2002.Google Scholar
Mishra, R. D. and Ahmad, M. (1990). Manual on Irrigation Agronomy. Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, India.Google Scholar
Rana, N. S., Kumar, Sanjai, Saini, S. K. and Panwar, G. S. (2006). Production potential and profitability of autumn sugarcane-based intercropping systems as influenced by intercrops and row spacing. Indian Journal of Agronomy 51: 31–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, G. L. and Meade, G. P. (1955). Cane Sugar Handbook. A manual for cane sugar manufacturers and their chemists. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Tomar, S. S. and Tiwari, A. S. (1990). Production potential and economics of different crop sequences. Indian Journal of Agronomy 35: 30–35.Google Scholar
Verma, R. S., Motiwale, M. P., Chauhan, R. S. and Tiwari, R. K. (1981). Studies on intercropping of spices and tobacco with autumn sugarcane. Indian Sugar 31: 451–456.Google Scholar
Verma, S. P. and Modgal, S. C. (1983). Production potential and economics of fertilizer application as a resource constraints in maize-wheat crop sequences. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 9: 89–92.Google Scholar
Whiteley, G. M. and Dexter, A. R. (1982). Root development and growth of oilseed, wheat and pea crops on tilled and non-tilled soil. Soil & Tillage Research 2: 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, R. L., Yadav, D. V. and Sharma, A. K. (2008). Agro-economic analysis of sugarcane-based cropping systems in India. Indian Journal of Fertilizers 4: 71–86, 89–92.Google Scholar