Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:24:31.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and Productivity of Tapioca (Manihot utilissima)—I. Leaf Characteristics and Yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

C. N. Williams  and
S. M. Ghazali
C. N. Williams
Affiliation:
University of Malaya
S. M. Ghazali
Affiliation:
University of Malaya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The shoots of high, medium and low yielding clones of tapioca were examined to see whether yield was associated with morphological characteristics of the foliage and/or with leaf area development. The lowest yielding variety had the highest leaf area per stem, and vice versa, differences in leaf area being mainly due to differences in leaf size. Leaves of the highest yielding variety possessed attenuated lobes, which tended to have a more vertical mid-day orientation, whereas the lowest yielding variety possessed large broad-lobed leaves with more horizontal orientation. The intermediate variety had acutely attenuated lobes and showed a much more vertical day-time orientation. The relationship between the leaf properties and canopy efficiency is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , July 1969 , pp. 183 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, I. C., Greer, H. A. L. & Tanner, W. J. (1965). In Genes to Genus. Illinois: Intern. Min. and Chem. Corpn. Publication.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. S. (1966). J. appl. Ecol. 3, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Seak Khen (1966). Min of Agric. & Coop. (Malaysia) Dept. Conf. Information Paper, No. 45.Google Scholar
Chan, Seak Khen (1967). Min. of Agric. & Coop. (Malaysia) Dept. Conf. Information Paper, No. 24.Google Scholar
Gardener, C. J., Tanner, J. W., Stoskopf, N. C. & Reiberos, E. (1964). Am. Soc. Agron. Abstr. (Cited by Tanner & Jones loc. cit.)Google Scholar
Rutger, J. N. & Crowder, L. V. (1967). Crop Sci. 7, 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, R. (1962). Trop. Agric. Trin. 39, 147.Google Scholar
Tanaka, A. & Kawano, K. (1966). Pl. and Soil 24, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanner, J. W. & Jones, S. E. (1965). In Genes to Genus. Illinois: Intern Min. and Chem. Comm Publication.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Shigesaburo (1959). Jap. J. Breeding 9, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsunoda, Shigesaburo (1965). In Mineral Nutrition of the Rice Plant. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.Google Scholar
Verhagen, A. M. W., Wilson, J. H. & Britten, E. J. (1963). Ann. Bot. 27, 726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J. & Wrtts, K. J. (1959). Ann. Bot. 23, 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. N. & Soong, Ngin Kwi, (1967). Ann. Bot. 31, 731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar