Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T01:12:58.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and flowering of young cocoa plants is promoted by organic and nitrate-based fertiliser amendments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2020

Smilja Lambert ,
Hussin bin Purung ,
Syawaluddin  and
Peter McMahon Open the ORCID record for Peter McMahon [Opens in a new window]
Smilja Lambert
Affiliation:
Mars Wrigley Confectionary, Ballarat, Victoria 3355, Australia
Hussin bin Purung
Affiliation:
Mars Inc. Indonesia, Jalan Kima 10, Daya, Makassar 90241, Indonesia
Syawaluddin
Affiliation:
Mars Inc. Indonesia, Jalan Kima 10, Daya, Makassar 90241, Indonesia
Peter McMahon*
Affiliation:
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Cocoa (Theobroma cacao) farmers in Sulawesi, Indonesia typically use subsidised, ammonium-based rice fertilisers that in combination with poor agricultural practices have resulted in soil acidification, loss of organic matter, aluminium toxicity and lower soil fertility. As a result, these soils are only marginally appropriate for replanting cocoa to boost production. A field experiment was performed to test alternative soil amendments for successful replanting of cocoa on these deficient soils. In a trial with a randomised block design, 6-month old seedlings, top-grafted with the local MCC02 clone, were planted under light Gliricidia sepium shade and after 3 months treated quarterly with two options of mineral fertilisers: either a customised fertiliser, consisting of Nitrabor (a combination of calcium nitrate and boron), dolomite, rock phosphate and KCl or a NPK/urea mix used by farmers, each supplied with or without ‘micronutrient’ rock salt, organic fertiliser and beneficial microorganisms or their culture medium, a mixture of chitin and amino acids (a total of 20 treatments). Over a 4-year period, the marginal mean rates of stem diameter increment and flowering score were higher in customised fertiliser than NPK/urea treatments. The average growth rate was highest in the first year and was increased by supplying organic fertiliser. A significant correlation (r = 0.22, p < 0.05) occurred between growth and available P, but concentrations of available P were higher in the NPK/urea plots, which also had lower mean growth rates. Combined supply of organic fertiliser and microbes increased available P, as well as growth rates, in both the customised and NPK/urea treatments. In contrast, NPK/urea-treated plots without these amendments demonstrated very low growth rates. The customised formulation was more effective with or without added organic fertiliser or inoculated microbes. Micronutrient supply stimulated flowering. Growth rates in trees supplied with NPK/urea were also promoted by micronutrients. Leaf flush production occurred in regular cycles and was unaffected by the nutrient amendments. After 3 years, the customised and organic fertiliser application increased soil pH and exchangeable Ca and Mg concentrations, although they remained below recommended levels for cocoa production. These treatments had little impact on soil C content (about 1.3%) which was also deficient. Exchangeable Al and total Zn concentrations were higher in soils amended with NPK/urea. The results of the trial provide evidence that utilisation of organic fertiliser in combination with customised nitrate-based formulations improves cocoa establishment, growth and soil properties and should be recommended as a replacement for the NPK/urea fertilisers traditionally used by farmers.

Keywords

Theobroma cacaoAlternative soil amendmentsCocoaOrganicMicrobial promoters
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 56 , Issue 6 , December 2020 , pp. 794 - 814
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acheampong, K., Hadley, P., Daymond, A.J. and Adu-Yeboah, P. (2015). The influence of shade and organic fertilizer treatments on the physiology and establishment of Theobroma cacao clones. American Journal of Experimental Agriculture 6, 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acquaye, D.K., Smith, R.W. and Lockard, R.G. (1965). Potassium deficiency in unshaded Amazon cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) in Ghana. Journal of Horticultural Science 40, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adejobi, K.B., Agele, S.O. and Ewulo, B.S. (2017). Soil properties and cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) nutrient uptake as affected by organic and inorganic based fertilizers in Southwestern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Soil Science 27, 282–296.Google Scholar
Adejobi, K.B., Akanbi, O.S., Ugioro, O., Adeosun, S.A., Mohammed, I., Nduka, B.A. and Adeniyi, D.O. (2014). Comparative effects of NPK fertilizer, cowpea pod husk and some tree crops wastes on soil, leaf chemical properties and growth performance of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.). African Journal of Plant Science 8, 103–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adejuwan, J.O. and Ekanade, O. (1988). A comparison of soil properties under different land use types in a part of the Nigerian cocoa belt. Catena 15, 319–331.Google Scholar
Agoume, V. and Birang, A.M. (2009). Impact of Land-use Systems on some Physical and Chemical Soil Properties of an Oxisol in the Humid Forest Zone of Southern Cameroon. Tropicultura 27, 15–20.Google Scholar
Ahenkorah, Y. and Akrofi, G.S. (1968). Amazon cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) shade and manurial experiment (K2–01) at the Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana. 1. First five years. Agronomy Journal 60, 591–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahenkorah, Y., Akrofi, G.S. and Adri, A.K. (1974). The end of the 1st cocoa shade and manurial experiment at the Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana. Journal of Horticultural Science 49, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akiyama, T. and Nishio, A. (1996). Indonesia’s cocoa boom: hands off policy encourages smallholder dynamism. In Policy research working paper, Vol. 1580. Washington: The World Bank, 44 pp.Google Scholar
Alfaro-Flores, A., Morales-Belpaire, I. and Schneider, M. (2015). Microbial biomass and cellulase activity in soils under five different cocoa production systems in Alto Beni, Bolivia. Agroforestry Systems 89, 789–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, A.-A. and Valle, R. (2010). Cacao: Ecophysiology of growth and production. In DaMetta F. (ed), Ecophysiology of tropical tree crops. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., pp. 37–70.Google Scholar
Arsyad, D.S., Nasir, S., Arundhana, A.I., Phan-Thien, K.-Y., Toribio, J.-A., McMahon, P., Guest, D.I. and Walton, M. (2019). A one health exploration of the reasons for low cocoa productivity in West Sulawesi. One Health 8, 100–107.Google ScholarPubMed
Asomaning, E.J.A., Kwakwa, R.S. and Hutcheon, W.V. (1971). Physiological studies on an Amazon shade and fertilizer trial at the Cocoa Research Institute, Ghana. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science 4, 47–64.Google Scholar
Burger, M. and Jackson, L.E. (2003). Microbial immobilization of ammonium and nitrate in relation to ammonification and nitrification rates in organic and conventional cropping systems. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 35 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charter, C.F. (1956).The nutrient status of Gold Coast forest soils with special reference to the manuring of cocoa. In Report. Cocoa conference, London, 1955, pp. 40–48.Google Scholar
Cicek, E., Yilmaz, F. and Yilmaz, M. (2010). Effect of N and NPK fertilizers on early field performance of narrow-leaved ash, Fraxinus angustifolia. Journal of Environmental Biology 31, 109–114.Google Scholar
Cunningham, R.K. and Lamb, J. (1959). A cocoa shade and manurial experiment at the West African Cocoa Research Institute, Ghana. I. First year. Journal of Horticultural Science 34, 14–22.Google Scholar
Hardy, F. (1958). Cacao soils. Proceedings of the Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida 18, 75–87.Google Scholar
Hartemink, A.E. (2005). Nutrient stocks, nutrient cycling, and soil changes in cocoa ecosystems: A review. In Sparks D.L.(ed), Advances in agronomy, Vol. 86, pp. 227–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, L.W. and McPaul, J.W. (1959). The soil requirements of cocoa. Agricultural Journal [Fiji] 29, 62–64.Google Scholar
Hinsinger, P. (2001). Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant and Soil 237 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huett, D.O. (1997). Fertiliser use efficiency by containerised nursery plants. 2. Nutrient leaching. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 48, 259–265.Google Scholar
ICCO (2015). International Cocoa Organisation Annual Reports 2014–2015.Google Scholar
Jacoby, R., Peukert, M., Succurro, A., Koprivova, A. and Kopriva, S. (2017). The role of soil microorganisms in plant mineral nutrition-current knowledge and future directions. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 1617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jadin, P. and Snoeck, J. (1985). The soil diagnosis method to calculate the fertilizer requirements of the cocoa tree (Traduction Integrale). Coffee cocoa tea 29, 255–266.Google Scholar
Kaleem Abbasi, M. and Manzoor, M. (2018). Biosolubilization of phosphorus from rock phosphate and other P fertilizers in response to phosphate solubilizing bacteria and poultry manure in a silt loam calcareous soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 181, 345–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf, B. and Rubel, F. (2006). World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 15, 259–263.Google Scholar
Kurvitis, A. and Kirkby, E.A. (1980). The uptake of nutrients by sunflower plants (Helianthus annum) growing in a continuous flowing culture system, supplied with nitrate or ammonium as nitrogen source. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde 143, 140–149.Google Scholar
Lessa, A.S.N. and Anderson, D.W. (1996). Laboratory estimation of nutrient losses by leaching on an Oxisol from Brazil. Tropical Agriculture 73, 100–107.Google Scholar
Mainstone, B.J., Thong, K.C. and Tan, K.S. (1977). Effects of lime and rock phosphate additions upon growth of young cocoa. In Proceedings, Conference on Chemistry and Fertility of Tropical Soils, Nov. 1973, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 60–69.Google Scholar
Manikandan, P., Joshi, O.P., Khan, H.H., Mohapatra, A.R. and Biddappa, C.C. (1987). Nutrient profile in an areca nut-cacao system on a laterite soil. Tropical Agriculture 64, 13–16.Google Scholar
Marschner, H. (1995). The mineral nutrition of higher plants. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McMahon, P., Purung, H., Lambert, S., Mulia, S., Nurlaila, , Susilo, A.W., Sulistyowati, E., Sukamto, S., Israel, M., Saftar, A., Amir, A., Purwantara, A., Iswanto, A., Guest, D. and Keane, P. (2015). Testing local cocoa selections in three provinces in Sulawesi: (i) productivity and resistance to cocoa pod borer and Phytophthora pod rot (black pod). Crop Protection 70, 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, P.J., Susilo, A.W., Parawansa, A.K., Bryceson, S.R., Nurlaila, , Mulia, S., Saftar, A., Purwantara, A., bin Purung, H., Lambert, S., Guest, D. I. and Keane, P. J. (2018). Testing local cacao selections in Sulawesi for resistance to vascular streak dieback. Crop Protection 109:24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriarty, K., Elchinger, M., Hill, G., Katz, J. and Barnett, J. (2014).Cacao Intensification in Sulawesi: A Green Prosperity Model Project. In Task No. WFQ9.1017, Vol. Report NREL/TP-5400–62434. Millennium Challenge Account (Ed MCA). National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) under Interagency Agreement IAG-12–1866 Millennium Challenge Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosaic (n.d.). https://www.cropnutrition.com/resource-library/phosphate-rock. In Crop nutrition, Nutrient Source Specifics (No. 19), International Plant Nutrition Institute.Google Scholar
Mulia, S., McMahon, P., Purwantara, A., Djufry, F., Lambert, S., Keane, P. and Guest, D. (2019). Effect of organic and inorganic amendments on productivity of cocoa on a marginal soil in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Experimental Agriculture 55, 1–20.Google Scholar
Murray, D.B. (1967). Leaf Analysis applied to cocoa. Cocoa Growers’ Bulletin 9, 25–31.Google Scholar
Nair, S.K. and Rao, N.S.S. (1977). Microbiology of the root region of coconut and cacao under mixed cropping. Plant and Soil 46, 511–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, P.N., Webb, M.J., Berthelsen, S., Curry, G., Yinil, D. and Fidelis, C. (2011). Nutritional status of cocoa in Papua New Guinea. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Noordiana, N., Syed Omar, S.R., Shamshuddin, J. and Nik Aziz, N.M. (2007). Effect of organic-based and foliar fertilisers on cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) grown on an oxisol in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Soil Science 11, 29–43.Google Scholar
Ogunlade, M.O., Oluyole, K.A. and Aikpokpodion, P.O. (2009). An evaluation of the level of fertilizer utilization for cocoa production in Nigeria. Journal of Human Ecology 25, 175–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omotoso, T.I. (1971). Organic phosphorus contents of some cocoa growing soils of southern Nigeria. Soil Science 112, 195–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Omotoso, T.I. (1975). Technical and research aspects of soil fertility and fertilizer use in Nigeria with special reference to cocoa. Phosphorus in Agriculture 29, 37–42.Google Scholar
Panlibuton, H. and Lusby, F. (2006). Indonesia Cocoa Bean Value Chain Case Study. In microREPORT#65: USAID.Google Scholar
Ruf, F. and Yoddang (1998). The cocoa marketing sector in Sulawesi: A free market and “almost perfect” competition. Plantations Recherche Developpement, 170–174.Google Scholar
Shamshuddin, J., Azura, A.E., Shazana, M., Fauziah, C.I., Panhwar, Q.A. and Naher, U.A. (2014). Properties and management of acid sulfate soils in Southeast Asia for sustainable cultivation of rice, oil palm, and cocoa. Advances in Agronomy, 124, 91–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidhu, M., Sinuraya, Z. and Surianto (2003). Growth and yield responses of cocoa as affected by phosphate fertilizer application on volcanic soils in North Sumatera Province, Indonesia. Planter 79, 149–167.Google Scholar
Steiner, C., Teixeira, W.G., Lehmann, J., Nehls, T., de Macedo, J.L.V., Blum, W.E.H. and Zech, W. (2007). Long term effects of manure, charcoal and mineral fertilization on crop production and fertility on a highly weathered Central Amazonian upland soil. Plant & Soil 291, 275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiessen, H., Cuevas, E. and Chacon, P. (1994). The role of soil organic matter in sustaining soil fertility. Nature 371, 783–785.Google Scholar
van Vliet, J.A. and Giller, K.E. (2017). Mineral nutrition of cocoa: A review. Advances in Agronomy, 141, 185–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wessel, M. (1971). Fertilizer requirements of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) in South-Western Nigeria. In Communication Vol. 61. Amsterdam: Koninklijk Instituut voor de Tropen, p. 104.Google Scholar
Yusdar, H. and Hanafi, M.M. (2003). Use of phosphate rock for perennial and annual crops cultivation in Malaysia: A review. Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Lambert et al. supplementary material

Lambert et al. supplementary material

Download Lambert et al. supplementary material(File)
File 26.5 KB