Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:16:21.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foliar Diagnosis on Cotton in Macedonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

G. A. Argyriadis  and
N. A. Polyzopoulos
G. A. Argyriadis
Affiliation:
Research Station for Soils and Fertilizers of Thessaloniki, Greece
N. A. Polyzopoulos
Affiliation:
Research Station for Soils and Fertilizers of Thessaloniki, Greece
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The results of eight fertilizer experiments with cotton, conducted in several areas of Macedonia, were evaluated by leaf analysis to establish possible relations between leaf N, P and K and yield, as well as to estimate the adequacy ranges of those elements under local conditions. Such a relation between leaf N and yield does exist, and leaf N within the range 4·4–4·9% of DM is adequate. On the other hand, leaf P and K within the ranges of 0·20–0·29 and 1·5–2·6%, respectively, also seem to be adequate. These findings are in agreement with general experience in this region, where cotton seldom benefits from application of fertilizers other than nitrogenous.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 1977 , pp. 395 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chapman, D. H. (1966). In Diagnostic Criteria for Plants and Soils (Ed. Chapman, H. D.). Calif. Univ.Google Scholar
Chapman, D. H. & Pratt, P. F. (1961). Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Waters. Calif. Univ.Google Scholar
Fullmer, F. S. & Stromberg, L. K. (1962). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems, IV (Ed. Bould, C. et al. ) Michigan: Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1960). Soil Chemical Analysis. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lachover, D. & Arnon, I. (1965). Fertilité 23, 3 (Soils and Fertilizers 28, 403; Abstr. 2802).Google Scholar
Magnitski, K. P. (1959). In Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems, VIII (Ed. Reuther, W.). Washington: Am. Inst. Biol. Sci.Google Scholar
Malavolta, E. & Gomes, F. P. (1959). Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problem VIII (Ed. Reuther, W.). Washington: Am. Inst. Biol. Sci..Google Scholar
Mello, F. A. F. De (1960). An. Edafol. Agrobiol. 19, 285 (Soils and Fertilizers 24, 317; Abstr. 2243).Google Scholar
Mello, F. A. F. De, Brasil, M. O. C. Do. & Haag, H. P. (1959). Ann. Esc. Agric. Queiroz 16, 123 (Soils and Fertilizers 24, 317; Abstr. 2242).Google Scholar
Mello, F. A. F. De, Coury, T. & Brasil, M. O. C. Do (1960). Fertilité 9, 3 (Soils and Fertilizers 23, 442; Abstr. 2817).Google Scholar
Tassoulas, J. A. (1971). Trans. 1st. Nat. Congr. Soil Sci. Athens: Greek Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar