Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:01:25.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EVALUATING COTTON INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT (IPM) FARMER FIELD SCHOOL OUTCOMES USING THE SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS APPROACH IN INDIA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2007

FRANCESCA MANCINI ,
ARIENA H.C. VAN BRUGGEN  and
JANICE L.S. JIGGINS
FRANCESCA MANCINI
Affiliation:
Biological Farming Systems GroupWageningen University, Marijkeweg 22, 6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands
ARIENA H.C. VAN BRUGGEN
Affiliation:
Biological Farming Systems GroupWageningen University, Marijkeweg 22, 6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands
JANICE L.S. JIGGINS
Affiliation:
Communication and Innovation Group, Wageningen University, Marijkeweg 22, 6709 PG Wageningen, The Netherlands and Communication and Innovation Group, Wageningen University, De Dellen 4, 6673 MD, Andelst, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Farmer field schools (FFSs) were conducted in southern India to reduce pesticide input and enhance sustainability of cotton production systems. This study was carried out to determine the additional benefits of FFSs in the social and economic arena, using the sustainable livelihoods (SL) concept to frame the evaluation. Farmers who had participated in the integrated pest management (IPM) FFSs perceived a range of impacts much beyond the adoption of IPM practices. The reduced cost of cultivation allowed for financial recovery from debt and the building of physical assets. IPMFFS households and production systems were perceived by the participants to have become more economically resilient than Non-IPMFFS control groups when faced with adversity. In the participants' view, IPMFFSs also led to enhanced individual and community social well-being, a benefit valued in particular by the women participants. The study tested a new application of the SL conceptual framework as a tool for evaluation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , January 2007 , pp. 97 - 112
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)