Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:37:48.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enhanced-efficiency nitrogen fertilizer boosts cauliflower productivity and farmers’ income: Multi-location and multi-year field trials across Nepal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2022

Naba Raj Pandit Open the ORCID record for Naba Raj Pandit [Opens in a new window] ,
Yam Kanta Gaihre ,
Shriniwas Gautam ,
Shashish Maharjan ,
Shree Prasad Vista  and
Dyutiman Choudhary
Naba Raj Pandit*
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), P.O. Box 5186, Lalitpur, Nepal
Yam Kanta Gaihre
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), P.O. Box 5186, Lalitpur, Nepal International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC), Lalitpur, Nepal
Shriniwas Gautam
Affiliation:
Pulte Institute for Global Development, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA
Shashish Maharjan
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), P.O. Box 5186, Lalitpur, Nepal
Shree Prasad Vista
Affiliation:
National Soil Science Research Center (NSSRC), Nepal Agricultural Research Council (NARC), Lalitpur, Nepal
Dyutiman Choudhary
Affiliation:
International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), P.O. Box 5186, Lalitpur, Nepal
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Enhanced-efficiency nitrogen (N) fertilizers (EENFs) such as slow-release polymer-coated urea (PCU) and deep placement of urea briquettes (UBs) improve nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) by reducing N losses and increasing nitrogen uptake by plants. Multilocation field trials (81) with cauliflower were conducted across two agroecological regions covering seven districts during two crop-growing seasons between 2018 and 2020 to assess the potential of three EENFs, i.e., PCU, sulphur-coated urea (SCU) and UB for increasing curd yields, agronomic NUE (AEN) and economic benefits over conventional urea (CU). Results were compared with farmers’ current nutrient management practice (FP): applying CU at 58.5 kg N ha−1 (ranging from 33 to 88 kg N ha−1). The N rates in three EENF treatments were 33% lower (100 kg N ha−1), considering their higher N use efficiency, than for CU (150 kg N ha−1). We hypothesize that EENFs produce similar or even higher yields compared with CU. For both years, all three EENFs resulted in significantly (p < 0.05) higher curd yields than CU (36.7 ± 1.1 t ha−1). PCU, SCU and UB increased yields by 21, 21 and 24% over those for CU. The yield increment was much higher (PCU, 44%; SCU, 43%; UB, 46%) than for FP. Similarly, PCU, SCU and UB increased the partial factor productivity of N (PFPN) by 91, 90 and 94% and the AEN by 133, 129 and 138%, respectively, compared with CU. The gross margins of all three EENFs were similar: an average 25% more than with CU and 51% more than with FP. These results suggest that EENFs could help increase productivity and farmer income while considerably reducing N input, compared to use of CU. The government of Nepal should promote these EENFs by removing barriers to access for the associated fertilizers and foster their use through extension.

Keywords

Polymer-coated ureaSulphur-coated ureaUrea briquetteNitrogen use efficiencyVegetable productivityNepal
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 58 , 2022 , e14
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agyin-Birikorang, S., Winings, J.H., Yin, X., Singh, U. and Sanabria, J. (2018). Field evaluation of agronomic effectiveness of multi-nutrient fertilizer briquettes for upland crop production. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 110, 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baral, B.R., Pande, K.R., Gaihre, Y.K., Baral, K.R., Sah, S.K., Thapa, Y.B. and Singh, U. (2020). Increasing nitrogen use efficiency in rice through fertilizer application method under rainfed drought conditions in Nepal. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 118, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belbase, P. and Bc, L. (2020). Effects of different fertilizers on yield and vitamin C content of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis) – A review. Asian Journal of Agricultural and Horticultural Research 6, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouyoucos, G.J. (1936). Directions for making mechanical analyses of soils by the hydrometer method. Soil Science 42, 225–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, B.D., Hornbacher, A.J. and Naylor, D.V. (1988). Sulfur-coated urea as a slow-release nitrogen source for onions. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 113, 864–869.Google Scholar
Carson, L.C. and Ozores-Hampton, M. (2012). Methods for determining nitrogen release from controlled-release fertilizers used for vegetable production. Horttechnology 22, 20–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, L.C. and Ozores-Hampton, M. (2013). Factors affecting nutrient availability, placement, rate, and application timing of controlled-release fertilizers for Florida vegetable production using seepage irrigation. Horttechnology 23, 553–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, D., Suter, H., Islam, A., Edis, R., Freney, J.R. and Walker, C.N. (2008). Prospects of improving efficiency of fertiliser nitrogen in Australian agriculture: a review of enhanced efficiency fertilisers. Soil Research 46, 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z., Wang, Q., Ma, J., Zou, P. and Jiang, L. (2020). Impact of controlled-release urea on rice yield, nitrogen use efficiency and soil fertility in a single rice cropping system. Scientific Reports 10, 1–10.Google Scholar
Csizinszky, A.A. (1994). Yield response of bell pepper and tomato to controlled-release fertilizers on sand. Journal of Plant Nutrition 17, 1535–1549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrick, B.E., Etienne, I. and Mathusalem, K. (2017). Comparative study of urea in prilled and briquette forms on rice production in Marshlands of Rwanda. Journal of Fertilizers & Pesticides 8, 178.Google Scholar
Devkota, K.P., Devkota, M., Khadka, L., Khadka, A., Paudel, G., Acharya, S. and McDonald, A.J. (2018). Nutrient responses of wheat and rapeseed under different crop establishment and fertilization methods in contrasting agro-ecological conditions in Nepal. Soil and Tillage Research 181, 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhakal, K., Baral, B.R., Pokhrel, K.R., Pandit, N.R., Thapa, S.B., Gaihre, Y.K. and Vista, S.P. (2020) Deep placement of briquette urea increases agronomic and economic efficiency of maize in sandy loam soil. AGRIVITA, Journal of Agricultural Science 42. https://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v42i3.2766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drost, D., Koenig, R. and Tindall, T. (2002). Nitrogen use efficiency and onion yield increased with a polymer-coated nitrogen source. HortScience 37, 338–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fermont, A. and Benson, T. (2011). Estimating yield of food crops grown by smallholder farmers. International Food Policy Research Institute 1, 68.Google Scholar
Gaihre, Y.K., Singh, U., Islam, S.M.M., Huda, A., Islam, M R, Satter, M.A., Sanabria, J., Islam, Md R and Shah, A.L. (2015). Impacts of urea deep placement on nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from rice fields in Bangladesh. Geoderma 259, 370–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guertal, E.A. (2009). Slow-release nitrogen fertilizers in vegetable production: a review. Horttechnology 19, 16–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, J., Hu, Z., Sun, W. and Huang, Y. (2010). Nitrous oxide emissions from Chinese cropland fertilized with a range of slow-release nitrogen compounds. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 135, 216–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J.D. (2021). Nutrient use efficiency—A metric to inform 4R nutrient stewardship. Crops & Soils 54, 42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, S., Cui, S., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Mi, G. and Gao, Q. (2020). Synergistic regulation of nitrogen and sulfur on redox balance of maize leaves and amino acids balance of grains. Frontiers in Plant Science 11, 1777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McArdle, R.N. and McClurg, C.A. (1986). Effects of sulfur-coated urea fertilizer regimes on production of processing tomatoes on a sandy loam. Fertilizer Research 8, 259–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MoALD. (2019). Statistical information on Nepalese Agriculture 2017/18. Kathmandu, Nepal.Google Scholar
Morgan, K.T., Cushman, K.E. and Sato, S. (2009). Release mechanisms for slow-and controlled-release fertilizers and strategies for their use in vegetable production. Horttechnology 19, 10–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naz, M.Y. and Sulaiman, S.A. (2016). Slow release coating remedy for nitrogen loss from conventional urea: a review. Journal of Controlled Release 225, 109–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neupane, B., Aryal, K., Chhetri, L.B. and Regmi, S. (2020). Effects of integrated nutrient management in early season cauliflower production and its residual effects on soil properties. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources 3, 353–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojha, P. (2016). A study of vegetable and fruit export from Eastern region of Nepal. South Asia Watch on Trade, Economics and Environment (SAWTEE). Kathmandu Var. Printers.Google Scholar
Olsen, S.R. and Sommers, L.E. (1982). Phosphorus. p. 403–430. AL Page et al.(ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. Phosphorus. p. 403–430. AL Page al.(ed.) Methods soil Anal. Part 2. 2nd ed. Agronomy Mongraphs. 9. ASA SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Pandit, N.R., Mulder, J., Hale, S.E., Zimmerman, A.R., Pandit, B.H. and Cornelissen, G. (2018). Multi-year double cropping biochar field trials in Nepal: Finding the optimal biochar dose through agronomic trials and cost-benefit analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 637–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.107 Google ScholarPubMed
Panta, H.K. (2018). Supply chain of subsidized chemical fertilizers in Nepal. Journal of the Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science 35, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perveen, S., Ahmad, S., Skalicky, M., Hussain, I., Habibur-Rahman, M., Ghaffar, A., Shafqat Bashir, M., Batool, M., Hassan, M.M. and Brestic, M. (2021). Assessing the potential of polymer coated urea and sulphur fertilization on growth, physiology, yield, oil contents and nitrogen use efficiency of sunflower crop under arid environment. Agronomy 11, 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pooniya, V., Shivay, Y.S., Pal, M. and Bansal, R. (2018). Relative performance of boron, sulphur and zinc coatings onto prilled urea for increasing productivity and nitrogen use efficiency in maize. Experimental Agriculture 54, 577–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ransom, C.J. (2014). Nitrogen use efficiency of polymer-coated urea. MS thesis. Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
Ray, M. and Mishra, N. (2017). Effect of weather parameters on the growth and yield of Cauliflower. Environment Conservation Journal 18, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez, V.M., Soengas, P., Alonso-Villaverde, V., Sotelo, T., Cartea, M.E. and Velasco, P. (2015). Effect of temperature stress on the early vegetative development of Brassica oleracea L. BMC Plant Biology 15, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossini, F., Provenzano, M.E., Sestili, F. and Ruggeri, R. (2018). Synergistic effect of sulfur and nitrogen in the organic and mineral fertilization of durum wheat: grain yield and quality traits in the Mediterranean environment. Agronomy 8, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrestha, R.B., Huang, W.-C., Gautam, S. and Johnson, T.G. (2016). Efficiency of small scale vegetable farms: policy implications for the rural poverty reduction in Nepal. Agricultural Economics 62, 181–195.Google Scholar
Shrestha, R.K. and Maskey, S.L. (2005). Associative nitrogen fixation in lowland rice. Nepal Agriculture Research Journal 6, 112–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikora, J., Niemiec, M., Szeląg-Sikora, A., Gródek-Szostak, Z., Kuboń, M. and Komorowska, M. (2020). The impact of a controlled-release fertilizer on greenhouse gas emissions and the efficiency of the production of Chinese cabbage. Energies 13, 2063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonne, E.H. and Hutchinson, C.M. (2005). Controlled-release fertilizers for vegetable production in the era of best management practices: teaching new tricks to an old dog. Horttechnology 15, 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, C.S. (2017). Enhanced nitrogen fertiliser technologies support the ‘4R’concept to optimise crop production and minimise environmental losses. Soil Research 55, 463–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Team, R.C. (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Trenkel, M.E. (1997). Controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers in agriculture. Paris: International Fertilizer Industry Association.Google Scholar
Trenkel, M.E. (2010). Slow-and controlled-release and stabilized fertilizers: an option for enhancing nutrient use efficiency in agriculture. Paris: IFA, International Fertilizer Industry Association.Google Scholar
Van Eerd, L.L., Turnbull, J.J.D., Bakker, C.J., Vyn, R.J., McKeown, A.W. and Westerveld, S.M. (2017). Comparing soluble to controlled-release nitrogen fertilizers: storage cabbage yield, profit margins, and N use efficiency. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 98, 815–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanlauwe, B., Bationo, A., Chianu, J., Giller, K.E., Merckx, R., Mokwunye, U., Ohiokpehai, O., Pypers, P., Tabo, R. and Shepherd, K.D. (2010). Integrated soil fertility management: operational definition and consequences for implementation and dissemination. Outlook on Agriculture 39, 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkley, A. and Black, I.A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Lv, J., Coulter, J.A., Xie, J., Yu, J., Li, J., Zhang, J., Tang, C., Niu, T. and Gan, Y. (2020). Slow-release fertilizer improves the growth, quality, and nutrient utilization of wintering Chinese Chives (Allium tuberosum Rottler ex Spreng.). Agronomy 10, 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., Davidson, E.A., Mauzerall, D.L., Searchinger, T.D., Dumas, P. and Shen, Y. (2015). Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Pandit et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S5 and Table S1

Download Pandit et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.2 MB