Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T18:53:56.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFICIENT TILLAGE AND NUTRIENT PRACTICES FOR SUSTAINABLE PEARL MILLET PRODUCTIVITY IN DIFFERENT SOIL AND AGRO-CLIMATIC CONDITIONS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2011

G. R. MARUTHI SANKAR ,
P. K. MISHRA ,
K. L. SHARMA ,
S. P. SINGH ,
A. K. NEMA ,
D. K. KATHMALE ,
S. K. UPADHYE ,
M. S. SIDHPURIA ,
M. OSMAN  and
G. RAVINDRA CHARY
...Show all authors
G. R. MARUTHI SANKAR
Affiliation:
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture (AICRPDA), Hyderabad–500059, Andhra Pradesh, India
P. K. MISHRA
Affiliation:
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture (AICRPDA), Hyderabad–500059, Andhra Pradesh, India
K. L. SHARMA*
Affiliation:
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture (AICRPDA), Hyderabad–500059, Andhra Pradesh, India
S. P. SINGH
Affiliation:
AICRPDA, RBS College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India
A. K. NEMA
Affiliation:
AICRPDA, RBS College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India
D. K. KATHMALE
Affiliation:
AICRPDA, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Solapur, Maharashtra, India
S. K. UPADHYE
Affiliation:
AICRPDA, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Solapur, Maharashtra, India
M. S. SIDHPURIA
Affiliation:
AICRPDA, Choudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India
M. OSMAN
Affiliation:
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture (AICRPDA), Hyderabad–500059, Andhra Pradesh, India
G. RAVINDRA CHARY
Affiliation:
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture (AICRPDA), Hyderabad–500059, Andhra Pradesh, India
J. KUSUMA GRACE
Affiliation:
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture (AICRPDA), Hyderabad–500059, Andhra Pradesh, India
B. VENKATESWARLU
Affiliation:
All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture (AICRPDA), Hyderabad–500059, Andhra Pradesh, India
A. K. SINGH
Affiliation:
Natural Resource Management, ICAR, New Delhi, India
*
‡Corresponding author. Address for correspondence. Division of Resource Management, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Santhoshnagar, P.O. Saidabad, Hyderabad-500 059, India. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Long-term field experiments were conducted at Agra, Solapur and Hisar from 2000 to 2008 to identify efficient tillage and nutrient management practices and to develop predictive models that would describe the relationship between crop yields and monthly rainfall for rainfed pearl millet grown on arid and semi-arid Inceptisol, Vertisol and Aridisol soils. Nine treatments comprising a factorial combination of three tillage practices, viz., conventional tillage (CT), low tillage + interculture (LT1) and low tillage + herbicide (LT2) and three fertilizer treatments viz., 100% N from an organic source (F1), 50% organic N + 50% inorganic N (F2) and 100% inorganic N (F3) were tested in a split-plot design at the three locations. Studies revealed that tillage and fertilizer treatments, and their interactions, significantly influenced pearl millet grain yields at the three locations. Prediction models describing the relation between grain yield and monthly rainfall indicated that rainfall occurring in June, July and August at Agra; June and July at Solapur; and June and August at Hisar significantly influenced pearl millet grain yield attained by different treatments. The R2 values of the model ranged from 0.64 to 0.81 at Agra; 0.63 to 0.92 at Solapur, and 0.75 to 0.89 at Hisar. When averaged over all the treatment combinations, mean pearl millet grain yields varied from 1590 to 1744 kg ha−1 at Agra; 1424 to 1786 kg ha−1 at Solapur; and 1675 to 1766 kg ha−1 at Hisar while their corresponding sustainability yield indice (SYI) varied from 35.4 to 42.2%, 19.9 to 45.6% and 64.1 to 68.3%, respectively. At Agra (Inceptisol), CTF3 resulted in significantly higher mean net returns (Rs 11 439 ha−1), benefit-cost ratio (2.33), rainwater use efficiency (RWUE) (3.52 kg ha−1 mm−1) and the second best SYI (39.9%). At Solapur (Vertisol), the LT1F3 resulted in significantly higher net returns (Rs 12 818 ha−1), benefit-cost ratio (3.52), RWUE (3.89 kg ha−1 mm−1) and the fourth best SYI (42.6%). At Hisar (Aridisol), the LT1F3 treatment gave higher net returns (Rs 3866 ha−1), benefit-cost ratio (1.26), RWUE (5.05 kg ha−1 mm−1) and the fourth best SYI (67.8%). These treatment combinations can be recommended for their respective locations to achieve maximum RWUE, productivity and profitability.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , January 2012 , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Behera, B., Maruthi Sankar, G. R., Mohanty, S. K., Pal, A. K., Ravindra Chary, G., Subba Reddy, G. and Ramakrishna, Y. S. (2007). Sustainable fertilizer practices for upland rice from permanent manurial trials under sub-humid Alfisols. Indian Journal of Agronomy 52: 33–38.Google Scholar
Blake, G. R. and Hartge, K. H. (1986). Bulk density. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. 2nd ed. Physical and Minerological Methods, 364–367 (Ed. Klute, A.). Agronomy Monograph 9 ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Blevins, R. L. and Frye, W. W. (1993). Conservation tillage: An ecological approach to soil management. Advances in Agronomy 51: 33–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C. A., Selles, F., Lafond, G. P. and Zentner, R. P. (2001). Adopting zero tillage management: impact on soil C and N under long-term crop rotations in a thin Black Chernozem. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 81: 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassel, D. K. and Nielsen, D. R. (1986). Field capacity and available water capacity. In Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods (2nd edn.) 901–926 (Ed. Klute, A.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. (1998). Applied Regression Analysis John Wiley, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follet, R. F. (1990). Effects of tillage practices on soil fertility in Great Plain's (USA) In Proceedings of 1st International Symposium on National Resources Management for Sustainable Agriculture, Feb 6–10 1990. Indian Society of Agronomy. New Delhi. 1:177–203.Google Scholar
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Hanway, J. J. and Heidel, H. (1952). Soil analyses methods as used in Iowa State College Soil Testing Laboratory. Iowa Agriculture 57: 1–31.Google Scholar
Hatfield, J. L. (1990). Agroclimatology of semiarid lands. Advances in Soil Science 13: 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempthorne, O. (1954). The Design and Analysis of Experiments, 370–389. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Lal, R. (1989). Conservation tillage for sustainable agriculture: tropics versus temperate environments. Advances in Agronomy 42:86–197.Google Scholar
Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lal, R. (2007). Constraints to adopting no-till farming in developing countries. Soil and Tillage Research 94: 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockeretz, W. (1988). Open questions in sustainable agriculture. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 3: 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruthi Sankar, G. R., Vittal, K. P. R., Ravindra Chary, G., Ramakrishna, Y. S. and Girija, A. (2006). Sustainability of tillage practices for rainfed crops under different soil and climatic situations in India. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 21: 60–73.Google Scholar
Maruthi Sankar, G. R., Sharma, K. L., Dhanapal, G. N., Shankar, M. A., Mishra, P. K., Venkateswarlu, B. and Kusuma Grace, J. (2010a). Influence of soil and fertilizer nutrients on sustainability of rainfed finger millet yield and soil fertility in semi-arid Alfisols. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 1462–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maruthi Sankar, G. R., Mishra, P. K., Srinivasa Rao, Ch., Padama Latha, Y., Sahadev Reddy, B., Babu, M. V. S., Ravindrnath Reddy, B., Veerabhadra Rao, K., Bhargavi, K., Ravindra Chary, G., Osman, M., Shalander, Kumar, Vasundhara, S., Devasena, G. S. and Girija, A. (2010b). Assessment of sustainability of groundnut yield using rainfall, soil moisture and soil fertility variables under arid Alfisols. Indian Journal of Dryland Agriculture Research and Development 25: 39–46.Google Scholar
Nambiar, K. K. M. (2002). Soil fertility and crop productivity under long- term fertilizer use in India. Directorate Information and Publications of Agriculture, Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Nema, A. K., Maruthi Sankar, G. R. and Chauhan, S. P. S. (2008). Selection of superior tillage and fertilizer practices based on rainfall and soil moisture effects on pearl millet yield under semi-arid Inceptisol. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 134: 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S. and Dean, L. A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorous in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circ. 939. USDA, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Rhoades, J. D. (1982). Soluble salts. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Agronomy Monograph 9, (Eds Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., and Keeney, D. R.). Madison. USA: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Richey, C. B., Griffith, D. R. and Parsons, S. D. (1977). Yields and cultural energy requirements for corn and soybeans with various tillage-planting systems. Advances in Agronomy 29:141–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockstrom, J., Barron, J. and Fox, P. (2003). Water productivity in rainfed agriculture: Challenges and opportunities for smallholder farmers in drought-prone tropical agroecosystems. In Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement, 145–162 (Eds Kijne, W., Barker, R. and Molden, D.). Wallingford: CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roldan, A., Caravaca, F., Hernande, M. T., Garcia, C., Sanchez-Brito, C., Velasque, M. and Tiscareno, M. (2003). No-tillage, crop residue additions, and legume cover cropping effects on soil quality characteristics under maize in Patzcuaro watershed (Mexico). Soil and Tillage Research 72: 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, K. L., Mandal, U. K., Srinivas, K., Vittal, K. P. R., Mandal, B., Kusuma Grace, J. and Ramesh, V. (2005). Long term soil management effects on crop yields and soil quality in dryland Alfisols. Soil and Tillage Research 83: 246–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, K. L., Neelaveni, K., Katyal, J. C., Srinivasa Raju, A, Srinivas, K., Kusuma Grace, J. and Madhavi, M. (2008a). Effect of conjunctive use of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) yield, soil fertility and overall soil quality in rainfed Alfisol. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 39: 1791–1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, K. L., Kusuma Grace, J., Mandal, Uttam Kumar, Pravin Gajbhiye, N., Srinivas, K., Korwar, G. R., Ramesh, V., Ramachandran, Kausalya and Yadav, S. K. (2008b). Evaluation of long-term soil management practices using key indicators and soil quality indices in a semi-arid tropical Alfisol. Australian Journal of Soil Research 46: 368–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Sanjay, Maruthi Sankar, G. R., Thakurand, C. H. and Sharma, R. A. (2009). Modeling of soybean yield for sustainability based on rainfall and soil and plant relationships under semi-arid Vertisols in central India. Agropedology 19: 121–134.Google Scholar
Shaver, T. M., Peterson, G. A., Ahuja, L. R., Westfall, D. G., Sherrod, L. A., and Dunn, G. (2002). Surface soil physical properties after twelve years of dryland no till management. Soil Science Society of America Journal 66: 1296–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subbaiah, B. V., and Asija, G. C. (1956). A rapid procedure for determination of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science 25: 259–260.Google Scholar
Unger, P. W. (1990). Conservation tillage systems. Advances in Soil Science 13: 28–57.Google Scholar
Venkarteswarlu, B., Sharma, K. L. and Prasad, J. V. N. S. (2010). Conservation agriculture- constraints, issues and opportunities in rainfed areas, 119–128. Conservation Agriculture – Innovations for Improving Efficiency, Equity and Environment. National Academy of Agricultural Sciences (NAAS), NASC Complex, DPS Marg, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, India.Google Scholar
Vittal, K. P. R., Vijayalakshmi, K. and Rao, U. M. B. (1983). Effect of deep tillage on dryland crop production in red soils in India. Soil and Tillage Research 3:377–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vittal, K. P. R., Maruthi Sankar, G. R., Singh, H. P. and Samra, J. S. (2002). Sustainability of Practices of Dryland Agriculture – Methodology and Assessment, All India Coordinated Research Project for Dryland Agriculture, Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Hyderabad - 500 059.Google Scholar
Vittal, K. P. R., Maruthi Sankar, G. R., Singh, H. P., Balaguravaiah, D., Padamalatha, Y. and Yellamanda Reddy, T. (2003). Modeling sustainability of crop yield on rainfed groundnut based on rainfall and land degradation. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 18: 7–13.Google Scholar
Walkley, and Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the effect of the digestive method for determining soil organic matter and the proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wani, S. P., Sreedevi, T. K., Rockstrom, J. and Ramakrishna, Y. S. (2009). Rainfed agriculture –past trends and future prospects. In Rainfed Agriculture. Unlocking the Potential, (Eds Wani, S. P., Rockstrom, Johan and Oweis, Theib). Wallingford: CAB International.CrossRefGoogle Scholar