Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:22:38.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Intercropping Maize with Pigeon Peas on Grain Yield and Nutrient Uptake

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

R. C. Dalal
R. C. Dalal
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Intercropping maize with pigeon peas, in a mixed stand or in alternate rows, significantly reduced the grain yield of maize but not of pigeon peas. Maize grown alone produced the maximum grain yield ha.−1 week−1, whereas maize and pigeon peas grown in alternate rows produced maximum proteins ha.−1 week−1 and absorbed the maximum amounts of potassium, calcium and magnesium. Pigeon peas grown in a pure stand produced minimum grain yield and proteins ha.−1 week−1, and absorbed minimum amounts of nutrients. The problem of intercropping maize with pigeon peas under optimum nitrogen fertilization is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , July 1974 , pp. 219 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Akinola, A. A. & Adeboyejo, A. F. (1971). J. Agric. Sci. 77, 219.Google Scholar
Bremner, J. M. (1965) Methods of Soil Analysis (Ed. Black, C. A.) 2, 1195. Madison: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Duncan, D. B. (1955). Biometrics II, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enyi, B. A. C. (1973). Expl Agric. 9, 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1958) Soil Chemical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kurtz, T., Melsted, S. W. & Bray, R. H. (1952). Agron. J. 44, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linder, R. C. (1944). Pl. Physiol. 19, 75.Google Scholar
Metson, A. J. (1956) Method of Chemical Analysis for Soil Samples. N.Z. D.S.I.R. Soil Bureau Bull. 12.Google Scholar
Scheibe, A. (1953). In The Manuring of Pulses (Ed. Schafer, P.). Germany: Verlags. fur Ackerbau mbH.Google Scholar
Troug, E. (1930). J. Am. Soc. Agron. 22, 874.Google Scholar
Wit, C. T. de, Tow, P. G. & Ennik, G. C. (1966). Agric. Res. Rep., Wageningen 687, 1.Google Scholar