Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-15T09:33:08.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Environment and Cultural Conditions on Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Coffee Leaves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

J. B. D. Robinson
J. B. D. Robinson
Affiliation:
East African Agriculture and Forestry Research Organization, Muguga, Kenya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Analyses of total N and P in coffee leaves from different geographic areas have been compared. The levels of these nutrients are correlated with each other and the quadratic regression equation for leaf N on leaf P has been derived. The value of N/P ratio in the coffee leaf for diagnosing nutritional status is assessed. No correlations were observed between Mg and either N or P. Irrigation of coffee in Kenya on latosolic soils raises leaf P but not N levels, in the absence of organic mulch and fertilizers. Effects of organic mulch, N and P fertilizers on leaf levels of N or P are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , October 1969 , pp. 301 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, R. M. & Robinson, J. B. D. (1963). Res. Rept. Coff. Res. Stn., Lyamungu, Tanganyika, 1962, 49.Google Scholar
Baker, R. M. (1966). Res. Rept. Coff. Res. Stn., Lyamungu, Tanzania, 1964, 48.Google Scholar
Culot, J. P., Van Wambeke, A. & Croegaert, J. (1958). Bull. I.N.E.A.C. Ser. Sci., 73, 1.Google Scholar
D'Hoore, J. L. (1964). Explanatory Monograph of the Soil Map of Africa. Lagos: C.T.C.A., 104.Google Scholar
Frankart, R. & Croegaert, J. (1959). Bull. I.N.E.A.C. Ser. Sci., 80, 1.Google Scholar
Jones, P. A., Robinson, J. B. D. & Wallis, J. A. N. (1960). Emp. J. expl Agric. 28, 335.Google Scholar
Low, W. L., Nery, J. P., Gallo, J. R. & Medcalf, J. C. (1956). I.B.E.C. Res. Inst. Bull. 9Google Scholar
Low, W. L., McClung, A. C., De Vita, R. & Gallo, J. R. (1961). I.B.E.C. Res. Inst. Bull. 26.Google Scholar
Mehlich, A. (1966a). Res. Rept. Coff. Res. Stn., Kenya, 1964/65, 46.Google Scholar
Mehlich, A. (1966b). Res. Rept. Coff. Res. Stn., Kenya, 1965/66, 32.Google Scholar
Muller, L. E. (1966). Coffee Nutrition. In Temperate to Tropical Fruit Nutrition. (Ed. Childers, N. F.) Rutgers: The State University.Google Scholar
Pereira, H. C. & Jones, P. A. (1950). E. Afr. agric. J. 15, 174.Google Scholar
Piper, C. S. (1950). Soil and Plant Analysis. University of Adelaide, 368.Google Scholar
Prevot, P. & Ollagnier, M. (1961). Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems. (Ed. Reuther, W.) Pub, American Institute of Biological Sciences, Washington, D.C., 257.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. B. D. (1956). Analyst 81, 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. B. D. (1961). E. Afr. agric. for. J. 37, 1.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. B. D. (1964). Ed. A Handbook on Arabica Coffee Growing in Tanganyika. Tanganyika Coffee Board, 181.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. B. D. (1968). Proc. Seminar on Intensification of Coffee Production in Kenya, Nairobi, December 1968. Appendix I.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. B. D. (1969). Expl Agric. 5, 311.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. B. D. & Baker, R. M. (1963). Res. Rpt. Coff. Res. Stn., Lyamungu, Tanganyika, 1962, 39.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. B. D. & Gacoka, P. (1962). Res. Rept. Coff. Res. Stn., Kenya, 1961/62, 47.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. B. D. & Hosegood, P. H. (1965). Expl Agric. 1, 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. B. D. & Freeman, G. H. (1967). E. Afr. agric. for. J. 33, 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, J. A. N. (1962). Res. Rept. Coff. Res. Stn., Kenya, 5.Google Scholar
Warden, J. C. (1961). Res. Rept. Coff. Res. Stn., Lyamungu, Tanganyika.Google Scholar
Warden, J. C. (1963). E. Aft. agric. for. J. 28, 195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar