Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:15:48.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DYNAMICS OF ACCUMULATION AND PARTITIONING OF DRY MATTER AND FRUCTO-OLIGOSACCHARIDES IN PLANT FRACTIONS OF FORAGE CEREALS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2015

A. IANNUCCI ,
M. PIZZILLO ,
G. ANNICCHIARICO ,
M. FRAGASSO  and
V. FEDELE
A. IANNUCCI*
Affiliation:
Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura – Cereal Research Centre (CRA-CER), S.S. 673 Km 25, 71122 Foggia, Italy
M. PIZZILLO
Affiliation:
Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura – Research Unit for the Extensive Animal Husbandry (CRA-ZOE), Via Appia, Bella Scalo, 85054 Muro Lucano (PZ), Italy
G. ANNICCHIARICO
Affiliation:
Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura – Research Unit for the Extensive Animal Husbandry (CRA-ZOE), Via Appia, Bella Scalo, 85054 Muro Lucano (PZ), Italy
M. FRAGASSO
Affiliation:
Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura – Research Unit for the Extensive Animal Husbandry (CRA-ZOE), Via Appia, Bella Scalo, 85054 Muro Lucano (PZ), Italy
V. FEDELE
Affiliation:
Consiglio per la Ricerca e la Sperimentazione in Agricoltura – Research Unit for the Extensive Animal Husbandry (CRA-ZOE), Via Appia, Bella Scalo, 85054 Muro Lucano (PZ), Italy
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]; http://www.cerealresearchcentre.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

During growth, several cereals store significant amounts of fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), which have important prebiotic properties. Cereal forage crops are also essential components of many Mediterranean agricultural systems, although little information is available on their dynamics of accumulation and partitioning of dry matter and FOS during growth. Oat (Avena sativa L., cv. ‘Flavia’ and cv. ‘Genziana’), emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccum Schrank, cv. ‘Giovanni Paolo’), barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. ‘Diomede’) and triticale (xTriticosecale Wittmack, cv. ‘Rigel’) were investigated for their synthesis of FOS, with a view to development of management approaches for harvesting high-quality forage, and to determine whether these species can be used as natural sources of FOS for commercial use. The study was conducted at Foggia (Italy) and Bella (Potenza, Italy) over two growing seasons (2008–2009; 2009–2010). Dry-matter accumulation and FOS contents were determined for plant fractions from heading to kernel-hard stages. There were large variations across these species for dry-matter partitioning and dry-matter yield (greatest for triticale: 1.24 kg m−2), and for FOS levels of total plants and plant fractions. Emmer wheat and triticale showed greater FOS production (52.0, 41.1 g m−2, respectively). Barley, emmer wheat and triticale showed higher FOS levels in total plants (4.11%, 5.93%, 4.33% dry matter, respectively). Barley, emmer wheat and triticale appear to be the most interesting species for production of forage biomass rich in FOS and as natural FOS sources for industrial use.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , April 2016 , pp. 188 - 202
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

AACC International, St. Paul, MN, U.S.A. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/AACCIntMethod-32-32.01.Google Scholar
Adom, K. K., Sorrells, M. E. and Liu, R. H. (2003). Phytochemical profiles and antioxidant activity of wheat varieties. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 51:7825–7834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aksland, G., Fohner, G., Gomes, M. C. and Jacobsen, T. (2010). Practical tips for growing, harvesting, and feeding high quality small grain cereal silage. Proceedings of California Alfalfa & Forage Symposium and Corn/Cereal Silage Mini-Symposium, 30 November - 1–2 December 2010, Visalia, CA, 1–6. Davis, CA: UC Cooperative Extension, Plant Sciences Department, University of California.Google Scholar
AOAC Official Methods of Analysis. (2005). (Horwitz, W., Ed.) 18th edn. Gaithersberg, USA: AOAC International.Google Scholar
Bassu, S., Asseng, S. and Richards, R. (2011). Yield benefits of triticale traits for wheat under current and future climates. Field Crops Research 124:14–24.Google Scholar
Calviere, I. and Duru, M. (1999). The effect of N and P fertilizer application and botanical composition on the leaf/stem ratio patterns in spring in Pyrenean meadows. Grass and Forage Science 54:255–266.Google Scholar
Cazzato, E., Laudadio, V. and Tufarelli, V. (2012). Effects of harvest period, nitrogen fertilization and mycorrhizal fungus inoculation on triticale (xTriticosecale Wittmack) forage yield and quality. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 27:278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cazzato, E., Tufarelli, V., Laudadio, V., Stellacci, A. M., Selvaggi, M., Leoni, B. and Troccoli, C. (2013). Forage yield and quality of emmer (Triticum dicoccum Schübler) and spelt (Triticum spelta L.) as affected by harvest period and nitrogen fertilization. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science, 63:571–578.Google Scholar
D’Egidio, M. G., Cecchini, C., Corradini, C., Canali, G., Cervigni, T. and De Vita, P. (1999). Fructo-oligosaccharides from cereal crops as ingredient for innovative foods. Proceedings of 8th Seminar on Inulin, 1999, 128-136 (Ed A. Fuchs). Lille, France: European Fructan Association.Google Scholar
Dreccer, M. F., van Herwaarden, A. F. and Chapman, S. C. (2009). Grain number and grain weight in wheat lines contrasting for stem water soluble carbohydrate concentration. Field Crops Research 112:43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellen, J. (1993). Growth, yield and composition of four winter cereals. I. Biomass, grain yield and yield formation. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 41:153–165.Google Scholar
Francia, E., Pecchioni, N., Li Destri Nicosia, O., Paoletta, G., Taibi, L., Franco, V., Odoardi, M., Stanca, A. M. and Delogu, G. (2006). Dual-purpose barley and oat in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research 99:158–166.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. A., Cairns, A. J. and Turner, L. B. (2007). Fructan in temperate forage grasses; agronomy, physiology and molecular biology. In: Recent Advances in Fructooligosaccharides Research, 15–46 (Eds Shiomi, N., Benkeblia, N. and Onodera, S.). Kerala, India: Research Signpost.Google Scholar
Gleason, S. M. and Ares, A. (2004). Photosynthesis, carbohydrate storage and survival of a native and an introduced tree species in relation to light and defoliation. Tree Physiology 24:1087–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, G. A. F. and Wallace, R. K. (1993). The origin, distribution, and evolutionary significance of fructans. In: Science and Technology of Fructans, 119–139 (Eds Suzuki, M. and Chatterton, N. J.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, R. (1982). Plant Growth Curves. The Functional Approach to Plant Growth Analysis. London: E. Arnold Publishers. ISBN 0-7131-2844-5.Google Scholar
Jenkins, C. L. D., Lewis, D., Bushell, R., Belobrajdic, D. P. and Bird, A. R. (2011). Chain length of cereal fructans isolated from wheat stem and barley grain modulates in-vitro fermentation. Journal of Cereal Science 53:188–191.Google Scholar
Juskiw, P. E., Helm, J. H. and Salmon, D. F. (2000). Postheading biomass distribution for monocrops and mixtures of small grain cereals. Crop Science 40:148–158.Google Scholar
Khorasani, G. R., Okine, E., Kennelly, J. J. and Helm, J. H. (1993). Effect of substituting whole crop cereal grain silage for alfalfa silage on performance of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 76:3536–3546.Google Scholar
Lattanzi, F. A., Ostler, U., Wild, M., Morvan-Bertrand, A., Decau, M. L., Lehmeier, C. A., Meuriot, F., Prud’homme, M. P., Schäufele, R. and Schnyder, H. (2012). Fluxes in central carbohydrate metabolism of source leaves in a fructan-storing C3 grass: rapid turnover and futile cycling of sucrose in continuous light under contrasted nitrogen nutrition status. Journal of Experimental Botany 63:2363–2375.Google Scholar
Leiva, E., Hall, M. B. and Van Horn, H. H. (2000). Performance of dairy cattle fed citrus pulp or corn products as sources of neutral detergent-soluble carbohydrates. Journal of Dairy Science 83:2866–2875.Google Scholar
Lloveras, J. and Iglesias, I. (2001). Morphological development and forage quality changes in crimson clover (Trifolium incarnatum L.). Grass and Forage Science 56:395–404.Google Scholar
Paradiso, A., Cecchini, C., Greco, E., D’Egidio, M. G. and De Gara, L. (2008). Variation in fructooligosaccharide contents during plant development and in different cultivars of durum wheat. Plant Biosystems 142:656–660.Google Scholar
Peng, Y., Niklas, K. J. and Sun, S. (2011). The relationship between relative growth rate and whole-plant C:N:P stoichiometry in plant seedlings grown under nutrient-enriched conditions. Journal of Plant Ecology 4:147–156.Google Scholar
Poorter, H. and Lewis, C. (1986). Testing differences in relative growth rate: a method avoiding curve fitting and pairing. Physiologia Plantarum 67:223–226.Google Scholar
Roberfroid, M. B. (2007). Inulin-type fructans: functional food ingredients. Journal of Nutrition 137:2493S–2502S.Google Scholar
Rosser, C. L., Górka, P., Beattie, A. D., Block, H. C., McKinnon, J. J., Lardner, H. A. and Penner, G.B. (2013). Effect of maturity at harvest on yield, chemical composition, and in situ degradability for annual cereals used for swathgrazing. Journal of Animal Science 91:3815–3826. doi:10.2527/jas.2012-5677.Google Scholar
Ruuska, S. A., Rebetzke, G. J., Van Herwaarden, A. F., Richards, R. A., Fettell, N. A., Tabe, L. and Jenkins, C. L. D. (2006). Genotypic variation in water-soluble carbohydrate accumulation in wheat. Functional Plant Biology 33:799–809.Google Scholar
Schnyder, H. (1993). The role of carbohydrate storage and redistribution in the source sink relations of wheat and barley during grain filling - a review. New Phytologist 123:233–245.Google Scholar
Shiomi, N., Benkeblia, N., Onodera, S., Yoshihira, T., Kosaka, S. and Osaki, M. (2006). Fructan accumulation in wheat stems during kernel filling under varying nitrogen fertilization. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 86:1027–1035.Google Scholar
Spiegel, J. E., Rose, R., Karabell, P., Frankos, V. H. and Schmitt, D. F. (1994). Safety and benefits of fructooligosaccharides as food ingredients. Food Technology 48:85–89.Google Scholar
Takahashi, T., Chevalier, P. M. and Rupp, R. I. (2001). Storage and remobilization of soluble carbohydrates after heading in different plant parts of a winter wheat cultivars. Plant Production Science 4:160–165.Google Scholar
Tesar, M. B. (1984). Physiological basis of Crop Growth and Development, 341. Madison, USA: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Van den Ende, W., Peshev, D. and De Gara, L. (2011). Disease prevention by natural antioxidants and prebiotics acting as ROS scavengers in the gastrointestinal tract. Trends in Food Science and Technology 22:689–697.Google Scholar
Vereyken, I. J., Chupin, V., Demel, R. A., Smeekens, S. C. and De Kruijff, B. (2001). Fructans insert between the headgroups of phospholipids. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1510:307–320.Google ScholarPubMed
Wardlaw, I. F. and Willenbrink, J. (2000). Mobilization of fructan reserves and changes in enzymes activities in wheat stems correlate with water stress during kernel filling. New Phytologist 148:413–422.Google Scholar
Weiner, J. (2004). Allocation, plasticity and allometry in plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 6:207–215.Google Scholar
Xiong, F., Yu, X., Zhou, L., Zhang, J., Jin, Y., Li, D. and Wang, Z. (2014). Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on distribution of starch granules in different regions of wheat endosperm. The Crop Journal 2:46–54.Google Scholar
Yang, J., Zhang, J., Wang, Z., Zhu, Q. and Liu, L. (2004). Activities of fructan- and sucrose-metabolizing enzymes in wheat stems subjected to water stress during grain filling. Planta 220:331–334.Google Scholar