Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:52:32.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DRY MATTER PRODUCTION AND NUTRIENT CONTENT OF MAMEY SAPOTE GROWN ON AN ACID ULTISOL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2018

RICARDO GOENAGA
RICARDO GOENAGA*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Tropical Agriculture Research Station, 2200 P.A. Campos Ave., Suite 201, Mayaguez 00680-5470, Puerto Rico
*
‡Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Little is known about the adaptability of mamey sapote (Pouteria sapota) to acidic soils high in aluminum (Al). A 2 year field study was conducted to determine the effects of various levels of soil Al on dry matter production, stem diameter and nutrient concentration in tissues of four cultivars of mamey sapote. Soil Al treatments were statistically different for all variables measured in the study. Cultivars and the year × cultivar interaction were not significant; therefore, results were averaged over cultivars and years. Increasing soil Al concentration from 3.5 to 7.8 cmol kg−1 resulted in an increase in total dry weight, but higher soil Al concentrations resulted in dry weight and stem diameter reductions. Increments in soil Al resulted in a significant reduction in the concentration of leaf, stem and root calcium. The Al concentration in leaf and stem tissues was not significantly affected with increments in soil Al, but there was a significant decline in the concentration of Al in root tissue suggesting that mamey sapote may exclude Al from roots.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , June 2019 , pp. 386 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balerdi, C. F. and Shaw, P. E. (1998). Sapodilla, sapota and related fruit. In Tropical and Subtropical Fruits, 78–136 (Eds Shaw, P. E., Chan, H. T. and Nagy, S.). Auburndale, FL: AgScience.Google Scholar
Committee on Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment in the Humid Tropics, Board on Agriculture and National Research Council (1993). Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment in the Humid Tropics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Eckhard, G., Horst, W. J. and Neumann, E. (2012). Adaptation of plants to adverse chemical soil conditions. In Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 409–472 (Ed Marschner, P.). Waltham, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2011). Committee on commodity problems. Intergovernmental group on bananas and tropical fruits. Current situation and short-term outlook. Assessed on: 1 April 2017. http://www.fao.org/docrep/meeting/028/ma937e.pdf.Google Scholar
Foss Tecator (2002). The Determination of Nitrogen According to Kjeldahl Using Block Digestion and Steam Distillation. Höganäs, Sweden: Application Note.Google Scholar
Goenaga, R. (2013). Dry matter production and nutrient content of longan grown on an acid ultisol. Experimental Agriculture 49:225–233.Google Scholar
Goenaga, R. and Jenkins, D. A. (2012). Yield and fruit quality traits of mamey sapote cultivars grown at two locations in Puerto Rico. HortTechnology 22:263–267.10.21273/HORTTECH.22.2.263Google Scholar
Goenaga, R. J. (2011). Dry matter production and leaf elemental concentrations of rambutan grown on an acid ultisol. Journal Plant Nutrition 34:753–761.10.1080/01904167.2011.540690Google Scholar
Goenaga, R., and Smith, J. R. (2002). Drymatter production and leaf elemental concentrations of common bean grown on an acid ultisol. Journal of Plant Nutrition 25:103–112.Google Scholar
Hoekenga, O. A., Maron, L. G., Piñeros, M. A., Cancado, G. M., Shaff, J., Kobayaski, Y., Ryan, P. R., Dong, B., Delhaize, E., Sasaki, T., Matsumoto, H., Yamamoto, Y., Koyama, H. and Kochian, L. V. (2006). AtALMT1, which encodes a malate transporter, is identified as one of several genes critical for aluminum tolerance in Arabidopsis. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences 103:97389743.Google Scholar
Horst, J. W., Wang, Y. and Eticha, D. (2010). The role of the root apoplast in aluminium-induced inhibition of root elongation and in aluminium resistance of plants: A review. Annals of Botany 106:185–197.10.1093/aob/mcq053Google Scholar
Kamprath, E. J. (1984). Crop responses to lime on soils in the tropics. In Soil Acidity and Liming, 349–368 (Ed Adams, F.). Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Kochian, L. V., Pence, N. S., Letham, D. L. D., Pineros, M. A., Magalhaes, J. V., Hoekenga, O. W. and Garvin, D. F. (2002). Mechanisms of metal resistance in plants: Aluminum and heavy metals. Plant and Soil 247:109–119.Google Scholar
Kochian, L. V., Pineros, M. A. and Hoekenga, O. A. (2005). The physiology, genetics and molecular biology of plant aluminum resistance and toxicity. Plant and Soil 274:175–195.Google Scholar
Langer, H., Cea, M., Curaqueo, G. and Borie, F. (2009). Influence of aluminum on the growth and organic acid exudation in alfalfa cultivars grown in nutrient solution. Journal of Plant Nutrition 32:618–628.Google Scholar
Magalhaes, J. V., Liu, J., Gimaraes, C. T., Lana, U. G., Alves, V. M., Wang, Y. H., Schaffert, R. E., Hoekenga, O. A., Piñeros, M. A., Shaff, J. E., Klein, P. E., Carneiro, N. P., Coelho, C. M., Trick, H. N. and Kochian, L. V. (2007). A gene in the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family confers aluminum tolerance in sorghum. Nature Genetics 39:1156–1161.Google Scholar
Mossler, M. A. and Crane, J. H. (2009). Florida crop/pest management profile: Mamey sapote and sapodilla. Univ. of Florida, Florida Coop. Ext. Serv., Inst. Food Agr. Sci. Circulation 1414.Google Scholar
Pérez, D. and Goenaga, R. (2015). Influence of aluminum on growth, mineral nutrition and organic acid exudation of rambutan (Nephelium lappaceum). Experimental Agriculture 51:582–593.10.1017/S0014479714000489Google Scholar
Perkin-Elmer (1994). Analytical Methods for Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Norwalk, Connecticut, USA: The Perkin-Elmer Corporation.Google Scholar
Rosas, A., Rengel, Z. and Mora, M. D. L. (2007). Manganese supply and pH influence growth, carboxylate exudation and peroxidase activity of ryegrass and white clover. Journal of Plant Nutrition 30:253–270.10.1080/01904160601118034Google Scholar
Samac, D. A. and Tesfaye, M. (2003). Plant improvement for tolerance to aluminum in acid soils – a review. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 75:189–207.10.1023/A:1025843829545Google Scholar
Téllez, P. P., Saucedo, V. C., Arévalo, G. M. L. and Valle, G. S. (2009). Ripening of mamey fruits (Pouteria sapota Jacq.) treated with 1-methylcyclopropene and refrigerated storage. CyTA Journal of Food 7:45–51.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (2011). National nutrient database for standard reference. Assessed on: 1 April 2017. http://www.ars.usda.gov/Services/docs.htm?docid=8964.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2014). SW-846 test method 6010D: Inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-AES). Assessed on: 4 April 2017. https://www.epa.gov/hw-sw846/sw-846-test-method-6010d-inductively-coupled-plasma-optical-emission-spectrometry-icp-aes.Google Scholar
Zheng, S. J. (2010). Crop production on acidic soils: Overcoming aluminum toxicity and phosphorus deficiency. Annals of Botany 106:183–184.Google Scholar