Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T05:29:31.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMPETITIVE ABILITY OF WINTER CEREAL–COMMON VETCH INTERCROPS AGAINST STERILE OAT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

I. VASILAKOGLOU ,
K. DHIMA ,
A. LITHOURGIDIS  and
I. ELEFTHEROHORINOS
I. VASILAKOGLOU*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Production, Technological and Educational Institute of Larissa, 411 10 Larissa, Greece
K. DHIMA
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Production, Technological and Educational Institute of Thessaloniki, 541 01 Echedoros, Greece
A. LITHOURGIDIS
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Aristotle University Farm of Thessaloniki, 570 01 Thermi, Greece
I. ELEFTHEROHORINOS
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Agronomy, School of Agriculture, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 541 24 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
†Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Intercropping cereals with legumes for forage or food production is extensively used as a cropping practice in many parts of the world. A 2-year field study was conducted using common vetch (Vicia sativa), winter wheat (Triticum aestivum), triticale (× Triticosecale), barley (Hordeum vulgare) and oat (Avena sativa) sole crops as well as common vetch intercrops with each of these cereals in a 35:65 cereal:common vetch ratio based on seed numbers, to determine their ability to compete with sterile oat (Avena sterilis spp. sterilis). At nine weeks after planting, fewer sterile oat plants emerged in common vetch sole crop than in cereal sole crops. Intercropping of cereals with common vetch generally did not affect sterile oat stem number and biomass compared with cereal sole crops. At harvest, cereal sole crops provided greater total dry biomass (DB) than the common vetch sole crop. However, triticale and oat produced more DB than winter wheat and barley. In most cases intercropping reduced total DB compared with cereal sole crops. The results of this study indicated that intercropping of the four winter cereals with common vetch did not provide any significant competitive advantage against sterile oat. However, common vetch sole crop showed the greatest suppressive ability against sterile oat among the sole crops or intercrops studied.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 509 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anil, L., Park, J., Phipps, R. H. and Miller, F. A. (1998). Temperate intercropping of cereals for forage: a review of the potential for growth and utilization with particular reference to the UK. Grass and Forage Science 53:301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banik, P., Midya, A., Sarkar, B. K. and Ghose, S. S. (2006). Wheat and chickpea intercropping systems in an additive series experiment: Advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy 24:325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, R., Goicoechea, E. L. and Hernaiz, P. J. (1995). Forage yields and quality of common vetch and oat sown at varying seeding ratios and seeding rates of common vetch. Field Crops Research 41:135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, P. M., Gardner, J. C., Schatz, B. G., Zwinger, S. W. and Guldan, S. J. (1995). Grain-yield and weed biomass of a wheat-lentil intercrop. Agronomy Journal 87:574–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C., Westcott, M., Neill, K., Wichman, D. and Knox, M. (2004). Row configuration and nitrogen application for barley-pea intercropping in Montana. Agronomy Journal 96:1730–1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damanakis, M. E. (1983). Weed species in wheat fields of Greece – 1982, 1983 survey. Zizaniology 1:85–90.Google Scholar
Dhima, K. V. and Eleftherohorinos, I. G. (2001). Influence of nitrogen on competition between winter cereals and sterile oat. Weed Science 49:77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhima, K. V., Eleftherohorinos, I. G. and Vasilakoglou, I. B. (2000). Interference between Avena sterilis, Phalaris minor and five barley cultivars. Weed Research 40:549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhima, K. V., Lithourgidis, A. S., Vasilakoglou, I. B. and Dordas, C. A. (2007). Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research 100:249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez Ponce, R. (1988). Competition between Avena sterilis spp macrocarpa Mo. and cultivars of wheat. Weed Research 28:303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1978). Genotype, environment and rainfall effects on common vetch varieties in a semiarid region. Experimental Agriculture 14:81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauriault, L. M. and Kirksey, R. E. (2004). Yield and nutritive value of irrigated winter cereal forage grass-legume intercrops in the southern high plain, USA. Agronomy Journal 96:352–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawes, D. A. and Jones, D. I. H. (1971). Yield, nutritive value and ensiling characteristics of whole-crop spring cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 76:479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemerle, D., Verbeek, B. and Diffey, S. (2006). Influences of field pea (Pisum sativum) density on grain yield and competitiveness with annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46:1465–1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesoing, G. W. and Francis, C. A. (1999). Strip intercropping effects on yield components of corn, grain sorghum, and soybean. Agronomy Journal 91:807–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lithourgidis, A. S., Dhima, K. V., Vasilakoglou, I. B. and Yiakoulaki, M. D. (2004). Mixtures of cereals and common vetch for forage production and their competition with weeds. In Proceedings of the 10th Conference Genetics and Plant Breeding Society of Greece. 104–108.Google Scholar
McDonald, G. K., Hollaway, K. L. and McMurray, L. (2007). Increasing plant density improves weed competition in lentil (Lens culinaris). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47:48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohler, C. L. and Liebman, M. (1987). Weed productivity and composition in sole crops and intercrops of barley and field pea. Journal of Applied Ecology 24:685–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarrete, L. and Fernandez-Quintanilla, C. (1993). The influence of crop rotation and soil tillage on seed population dynamics of Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana. Weed Research 36:123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osman, A. E. and Nersoyan, N. (1986). Effect of the proportion of species on the yield and quality of forage mixtures, and on the yield of barley in the following year. Experimental Agriculture 22:345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyejola, B. A. and Mead, R. (1982). Statistical assessment of different ways of calculating land equivalent ratios (LER). Experimental Agriculture 18:125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papastylianou, I. (2004). Effect of rotation system and N fertilizer on barley and common vetch grown in various crop combinations and cycle lengths. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 142:41–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qamar, I. A., Keatinge, J. D. H., Mohammad, N., Ali, A. and Khan, M. A. (1999). Introduction and management of common vetch/barley forage mixtures in the rainfed areas of Pakistan. 3. Residual effects on following cereal crops. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 50:21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, R. C. (1969). Annual legume:cereal mixtures for forage and seed. Agronomy Journal 61:759–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szumigalski, A. and Van Acker, R. (2005). Weed suppression and crop production in annual intercrops. Weed Science 53:813–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. J., Stout, D. G. and Moore, T. (1992). Forage production by four annual cropping sequences emphasizing barley irrigation in southern interior British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 72:181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. and Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14:415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar