Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T15:51:46.833Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparisons Between Strains of Eragrostis Curvula in South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

J. H. Leigh
J. H. Leigh
Affiliation:
Frankenwald Field Research Station, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Twenty strains of Eragrostis curvula, together with E. plana, Chloris gayana and Digitaria smutsii, have been compared on the basis of (a) herbage yields and (b) nitrogen, phosphate and potash composition and yield, from broadcast stands in a randomized block experiment over two seasons. The strains of E. curvula were grouped into types for which the names Curvula, Robusta Blue, Robusta Green, Robusta Intermediate, and Chloromelas were used. Significant differences were demonstrated in herbage yield between certain of these types, but there were no clear differences in nitrogen content. Chloris, Digitaria and the three Robusta types had the highest phosphate and potash content, whereas the Chloromelas type and E. plana were intermediate and the Curvula type was lowest in these constituents. Robusta Green, Robusta Intermediate and Curvula types had the highest nitrogen yield, Robusta Green and Robusta Intermediate types the highest phosphate yield, and Robusta Intermediate and Robusta types the highest yield of potash. The superiority of types other than Curvula (Ermelo and Tanganyika strains), and the need for research on the types, has been demonstrated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , October 1967 , pp. 327 - 335
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Botha, J. P. & Hamburger, H. (1953). Farm in S. Afr. 28, 377.Google Scholar
Brown, W. V. & Emery, W. H. P. (1957). J. S. Afr. Bot. 23, 123.Google Scholar
Brown, W. V. & Emery, W. H. P. (1958). Amer. J. Bot. 45, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crider, J. (1945). U.S.A Dept. Agric. Bul. 730.Google Scholar
Cummings, W. H. (1957). Amer. Soc. Agron. J. 39, 522.Google Scholar
Davidson, R. L. (1962). J. Ecol. 50, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, R. L. (1965). J. Range Mangent, 18, 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, P. E. (1937 a). S. Afr. J. Sci. 34, 244.Google Scholar
Glover, P. E. (1937 b). S. Afr. J. Sci. 33, 443.Google Scholar
Glover, P. E. & van Rensburg, H. J. (1938). S. Afr. J. Sci. 35, 274.Google Scholar
Hall, T. D. & Meredith, D. (1937). S. Afr. J. Sci. 33, 404.Google Scholar
Hall, T. D., Meredith, D. & Murray, S. M. (1937). S. Afr. J. Sci. 34, 275.Google Scholar
Hall, T. D., Meredith, D. & Murray, S. M. (1941). S. Afr. J. Sci. 37, III.Google Scholar
Hall, T. D., Meredith, D. & Altona, R. E. (1950). S. Afr. J. Sci. 18, 8.Google Scholar
Jong, K. & Roux, E. R. (1955). S. Afr. J. Sci. 52, 27.Google Scholar
Leigh, J. H. (1961 a). J. S. Afr. Bot. 27, 141.Google Scholar
Leigh, J. H. (1961 b). J. Ecol. 49, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, J. H. (1961 c). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 16, 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, J. H. (1961 d). Emp. J. expt. Agric. 29, 215.Google Scholar
Leigh, J. H. & Matthews, J. W. (1963). Aust. J. Bot. 11, 62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, D. (1947). Published thesis presented to the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Poultney, R. G. (1952). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis presented to the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
van Rensburg, H. J. (1939) S. Afr. J. Sci. 36, 238.Google Scholar
van Rensburg, H. J. (1942). S. Afr. J. Sci. 38, 186.Google Scholar
Rose, C. J. (1956). Unpublished thesis presented to the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Rose-Innes, E. (1939). Unpublished thesis presented to the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
Roux, E. R. (1954). S. Afr. J. Sci. 50, 173.Google Scholar
Staten, H. W. (1949). Crops and Soils, 2, 18.Google Scholar
Stebbins, G. L. (1950). In Variation and Evolution in Plants. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiven, G. (1957). Unpublished Ph.D. thesis presented to the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
De Winter, B. (1955). In The Grasses and Pastures of South Africa. Central News Agency.Google Scholar