Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:47:17.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BIOMASS AND CAFFEOYL PHENOLS PRODUCTION OF ECHINACEA PURPUREA GROWN IN TAIWAN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2008

C. L. CHEN ,
S. C. ZHANG  and
J. M. SUNG
C. L. CHEN
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
S. C. ZHANG
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC
J. M. SUNG*
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science & Nutrition, Hungkuang University, Shalu, Taichung County, Taiwan, 43302ROC
*
†Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Echinacea purpurea has been introduced in to Taiwan and grown successfully. However, information regarding the effects of the growing climate on its active constituents (e.g. caffeoyl derivatives) and biomass production is very limited. In this study the biomass of field-grown E. purpurea plants harvested during three different crop seasons was compared. The content of caffeoyl phenols and the production of aerial plant parts were also assayed. The results indicated that both morphological and agronomic traits were affected by crop season, with spring-grown plants producing more stems and flowers but fewer leaves than autumn-grown plants. Autumn-grown plants produced more caffeoyl phenols, particularly cichoric acid and caftaric acid, in leaf and flower tissues than spring grown plants. Thus, transplanting E. purpurea seedlings in the autumn and harvesting the aerial parts at the beginning of winter first, and then harvesting the rhizome-regenerated plants again in the following summer are technically feasible. This farming system would give commercial cultivation of E. purpurea in Taiwan a great competitive advantage over other growing regions, provided that an environmentally suitable population is selected and established in Taiwan.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , October 2008 , pp. 497 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barrett, B. (2003). Medicinal properties of Echinacea: a critical review. Phytomedicine 10:66–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Binns, S. E., Livesey, J. F., Arnason, J. T. and Baum, B. R. (2002). Phytochemical variation in Echinacea from roots and flowerheads of wild and cultivated populations. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 50:3673–3687.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briskin, D. P. (2000). Medicinal plants and phytomedicines. Linking plant biochemistry and physiology to human health. Plant Physiology 124:507–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goel, V., Lovin, R, Chang, C., Slama, J. V., Barton, R., Gahler, R., Bauer, R., Goonewardene, L. and Basu, T. K. (2005). A proprietary extract from the Echinacea plant (Echinacea purpurea) enhances systemic immune response during a common cold. Phytotherapy Research 19:689–694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, C. and Kitts, D. D. (2000). Studies on the antioxidant of Echinacea root extract. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 48:1466–1472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kreft, S. (2005). Cichoric acid content and biomass production of Echinacea purpurea. Plants cultivated in Slovenia. Pharmaceutical Biology 43:662–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letchamo, W. L., Polydeonny, L. V., Gladisheva, N. O., Arnason, T. J., Liversey, A. J. and Awang, D. V. C. (2002). Factors affecting Echinacea quality. In: Trends in New Crops and New Uses, 514–521. (Eds Janick, J., and Whipkey, A.), ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Li, T. S. C. (1998). Echinacea: cultivation and medicinal value. HortTechnology 8:122–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, T. C. (2003). The analysis of caffeic acid derivatives and antioxidant capacity in Echinacea spp. MS thesis, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.Google Scholar
Lindenmuth, G. F. and Lindenmuth, E. B. (2000). The efficacy of Echinacea compound herbal tea preparation on the severity and duration of upper respiratory and flu symptoms: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 6:327–334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahady, G. B., Qato, D. M., Gyllenhaal, C., Chadwick, G. B. and Fong, H. H. S. (2001). Echinacea: recommendations for its use in prophylaxis and treatment of respiratory tract infections. Nutrition in Clinical Care 4:199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merali, S., Binns, S., Paulin-Levasseur, M., Ficker, C., Smith, M., Baum, B., Brovelli, E. and Arnason, J. T. (2003). Antifungal and anti-inflammatory activity of the genus Echinacea. Pharmaceutical Biology 41:412–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millauskas, G., Venskutonis, P. R. and Van Beek, T. A. (2004). Screening of radical scavenging activity of some medicinal and aromatic plant extracts. Food Chemistry 85:231–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. C. (2005). Echinacea: a miracle herb against aging and cancer? Evidence in vivo in mice. Evidence Based Complementary Alternative Medicine 2:309–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mistríková, I. and Vaverková, Š. (2007). Morphology and anatomy of Echinacea purpurea, E. angustifolia, E. pallida and Parthenium integrifoliurm. Biologial Bratislava 62:2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murch, S. J., Peiris, S. E. and Shi, W. L. (2006). Genetic diversity in seed populations of Echinacea purpurea controls the capacity for regeneration, route of morphogenesis and phytochemical composition. Plant Cell Reports 25:522–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perival, S. S. (2000). Use of Echinacea in medicine. Biochemical Pharmacology. 60:155–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randolph, R. K., Gellenbeck, K., Stonebrook, K., Brovelli, E., Qian, Y., Bankaitis-Davis, D. and Cheronis, J. (2003). Regulation of human immune gene expression as influenced by a commercial blended Echinacea product: preliminary studies. Experimental Biology and Medicine 228:1051–1056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Runhle, E. S., Heins, R. D., Cameron, A. C. and Carlson, W. H. (2001). Photocontrol of flowering and stem extension of the intermediate-day plant Echinacea purpurea. Physiologia Plantarum 112:433–441.Google Scholar
Seidler-Lozykowska, K. and Dabrowska, J. (2003). Yield and polyphenolic acids content in purple coneflower (Echinacea purpurea Moench.) at different growth stages. Journal of Herbs, Spices and Medicinal Plants 10:7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speroni, E., Govoni, P., Guizzardi, S., Renulli, C. and Guerra, M. C. (2000). Anti-inflammatory and cicatrizing activity of Echinacea pallida Nutt. Root extract. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 79:265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, D. L. and Wills, R. B. H. (2000). Alkylamide and cichoric acid levels in Echinacea purpurea tissues during plant growth. Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants 7:91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taga, M. S., Miller, E. E. and Pratt, D. E. (1984). Chia seeds as a source of natural lipid antioxidants. Journal of American Oil Chemistry Society 61:928–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thygesen, L., Thulinn, J., Mortensen, A., Skibsted, L. H. and Molgaard, P. (2007). Antioxidant activity of cichoric acid and alkamides from Echinacea purpurea, alone and in combination. Food Chemistry 101:74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vimalanthan, S., Kang, L., Amiguet, V. T., Liversey, J., Arnason, T. and Hudson, J. (2005). Echinacea purpurea aerial parts contain multiple antiviral compounds. Pharmaceutical Biology 43:740–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wartidiningsih, N. and Geneve, R. L. (1994). Seeds source and quality influence germination in purple coneflower [Echinacea purpurea (L.) Moench.]. HortScience 29:1443–1444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, R. B. H. and Stuart, D. L. (1999). Alkylamide and cichoric acid levels in Echinacea purpurea grown in Australia. Food Chemistry 67:385–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar