Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:43:32.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Banana and Bean Intercropping: Factors Affecting Bean Yield and Land Use Efficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

C. S. Wortmann
Affiliation:
CIAT Regional Bean Programme in Eastern Africa, PO Box 6247, Kampala, Uganda
T. Sengooba
Affiliation:
CIAT Regional Bean Programme in Eastern Africa, PO Box 6247, Kampala, Uganda
S. Kyamanywa
Affiliation:
CIAT Regional Bean Programme in Eastern Africa, PO Box 6247, Kampala, Uganda

Summary

Beans and bananas were grown in sole crop and intercrop systems for three seasons in 1989 and 1990 to determine the effects of cropping system on diseases, insects and land-use efficiency and the roles of certain bean plant physiological traits on bean yield in the two systems.

Bean yield in the intercrop system was 52% of bean sole crop yield. Shading reduced yield, but stem starch levels, chlorophyll content and the chlorophyll a:b ratio were not related to seed yield in either system. Leaf area index was linearly related to yield in the intercrop system, suggesting that a higher plant density may result in higher yields. Nutrient concentration levels in the foliar tissues indicated that low potassium and high manganese availability constrained intercrop bean yield. Leaf manganese levels were higher in beans grown under bananas, reaching levels normally considered toxic for beans. Competition for other nutrients did not appear to affect bean yield. Apparently, interspecies competition for soil moisture did not much reduce bean yields as moisture levels did not differ with cropping system. Disease and insect pest levels were similar for the two bean production systems.

Banana yields were associated with potassium levels in the soil. Bananas appeared to be more competitive than beans in the intercrop system. The land equivalent ratio of the banana and bean intercropping system over the three seasons was 1.60.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M. W., Wiersma, J. V. & Salazar, J. (1978). Differences in starch accumulation among dry bean cultivars. Crop Science 18: 155157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. M., Chow, W. S. & Goodchild, D. J. (1988). Thylakoid membrane organization in sun/shade acclimation. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15: 1126.Google Scholar
Baker, A. S. & Smith, R. R. (1973). Preparation of solutions for atomic absorption analysis of Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu in plant tissue. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 22: 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudreau, M. A. (1990). Effects of maize intercrop on angular leaf spot of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Kenya. Annual Report of the Bean Cooperative Improvement 33: 4345.Google Scholar
Bremner, J. M. (1965). Total nitrogen. In Methods in Soil Analysis. II. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. (Eds) Black, C. A., Evans, D. D., White, J. L., Ensminger, L. E., Clark, F. E. & Dinauer, R. C.. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Chapman, H. D. & Pratt, P. F. (1961). Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Water. Riverside, California, USA: University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Ciat, (1987). Standard system for the evaluation of bean germplasm. Compiled by A. van Schoonhoven and M. A. Pastor-Corrales.Google Scholar
Horiguchi, T. (1988). Mechanism of manganese toxicity and tolerance of plants VII. Effect of light intensity on manganese induced chlorosis. Journal of Plant Nutrition 11: 235246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howeller, R. H. (1980). Nutritional disorders. In Bean Production Problems: Disease, Insect, Soil and Climate Constraints of Phaseolus vulgaris L., 341357. (Eds Schwartz, H. F. and Galvez, G. E.). CIAT.Google Scholar
Izquierdo, J. A., Hosfield, G. L., Uebersax, M. A. & Adams, W. M. (1985). The utility of the starch iodine and soluble solids tests for evaluating carbohydrate partitioning in dry beans. Agro-Ciencia 1(2): 145152.Google Scholar
Kyamanywa, S. & Ampofu, J. K. O. (1988). Effect of cowpea/maize mixed cropping on the incident light at the cowpea canopy and flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) population density. Crop Protection 7: 186189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, R. & Willey, R. W. (1980). The concept of a ‘land equivalent ratio’ and advantages in yield from intercropping. Experimental Agriculture 16: 217218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Msuku, W. A. B. & Edje, O. T. (1982). Effect of mixed cropping of maize and bean on bean diseases. Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative 25: 1618.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. & Riley, J. P. (1962). A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Analytical Chemistry Acta 27: 3136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearcy, R. W. (1988). Photosynthetic utilization of lightflecks in understorey plants. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 15: 223238.Google Scholar
Sengooba, T. (1990). Comparison of disease development in beans in pure stand and maize intercrop. Annual Report of the Bean Improvement Cooperative 33: 5758.Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. W. (1966). Bananas. Second edition. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ssali, H. (1977). Root activity of bananas during wet and dry seasons as measured by 32P uptake. East African Agriculture and Forestry Journal 42: 304308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, D. W. & Hunt, N. (1984). Growth, yield and leaf nutrient composition of 30 banana varieties in subtropical New South Wales. Technical Bulletin 31. New South Wales: Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. & Rao, M. R. (1980). A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Experimental Agriculture 16: 117126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar