Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T09:16:51.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variability in physiological responses of Venezuelan cacao to drought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2020

Wilmer Tezara Open the ORCID record for Wilmer Tezara [Opens in a new window] ,
Gabriela Pereyra Open the ORCID record for Gabriela Pereyra [Opens in a new window] ,
Eleinis Ávila-Lovera Open the ORCID record for Eleinis Ávila-Lovera [Opens in a new window]  and
Ana Herrera Open the ORCID record for Ana Herrera [Opens in a new window]
Wilmer Tezara*
Affiliation:
Centro de Botánica Tropical, Instituto de Biología Experimental, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Apartado 47114, Caracas1041-A, Venezuela
Gabriela Pereyra
Affiliation:
Centro de Botánica Tropical, Instituto de Biología Experimental, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Apartado 47114, Caracas1041-A, Venezuela Council on the Environment of New York City (GrowNYC), 100 Gold Street, New York, NY10038, USA
Eleinis Ávila-Lovera
Affiliation:
Centro de Botánica Tropical, Instituto de Biología Experimental, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Apartado 47114, Caracas1041-A, Venezuela Schmid College of Science and Technology, Chapman University, Orange, CA92866, USA
Ana Herrera
Affiliation:
Centro de Botánica Tropical, Instituto de Biología Experimental, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Apartado 47114, Caracas1041-A, Venezuela
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In order to assess the response of cocoa trees to drought, changes in water status, gas exchange, leaf carbon isotopic ratio (δ13C), photochemical activity, and leaf N and chlorophyll content during the rainy and dry season were measured in 31 Venezuelan cocoa clones (17 Trinitarios, 6 Criollos, and 8 Modern Criollos) grown in a common garden. Drought caused a 40% decrease in water potential (ψ) in all but the Modern Criollos, and a reduction in net photosynthetic rate (A) and stomatal conductance (gs) without an increase in instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE) in 93% of clones, and an increase in δ13C (long-term WUE) in 74% of clones; these responses suggest differences in tolerance to drought among clones. A positive correlation between A and both gs and leaf N content was found for all genotypes. Leaf N content, chlorophyll content, and photochemical activity were reduced during drought, suggesting that metabolism was also inhibited. The best performance during drought was shown by Modern Criollos with the highest WUE, while five Trinitario clones seemed to be less sensitive to drought, since neither chlorophyll, N, total soluble protein concentration, nor gs changed with drought, indicating that those Trinitario clones, with lower A, have a conservative water use. Modern Criollos showed no reductions in either ψ or gs; A remained unchanged, as did WUE, which was the highest, suggesting that these clones would be more successful in environments with low water availability. Our results indicate large variation in physiological response to drought over a range of parameters, suggesting possible differences in tolerance among clones.

Keywords

CocoaGas exchangeCarbon isotopic ratioDroughtSpecific leaf areaWater use efficiency
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , June 2020 , pp. 407 - 421
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acheampong, K., Hadley, P. and Daymond, A.J. (2013). Photosynthetic activity and early growth of four cacao genotypes as influenced by different shade regimes under west African dry and wet season conditions. Experimental Agriculture 49, 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acosta-Rangel, A., Ávila-Lovera, E., De Guzman, M.E., Torres, L., Haro, R., Arpaia, M.L., Focht, E. and Santiago, L.S. (2018). Evaluation of leaf carbon isotopes and functional traits in avocado reveals water-use efficient cultivars. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 263, 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almeida, A.-A.F. and Valle, R.R. (2007). Ecophysiology of the cacao tree. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 19, 425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araque, O., Jaimez, R.E., Tezara, W., Coronel, I., Urich, R. and Espinoza, W. (2012). Comparative photosynthesis, water relations, growth and survival rates in juvenile Criollo cacao cultivars (Theobroma cacao) during dry and wet seasons. Experimental Agriculture 48, 513–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ávila-Lovera, E., Coronel, I., Jaimez, R., Urich, R., Pereyra, G., Araque, O., Chacón, I. and Tezara, W. (2016). Ecophysiological traits of adult trees of Criollo cocoa cultivars (Theobroma cacao L.) from a germplasm bank in Venezuela. Experimental Agriculture 52, 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayegboyin, K.O. and Akinrinde, E.A. (2016). Effect of water deficit imposed during the early developmental phase on photosynthesis of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.). Agricultural Sciences 7, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bae, H., Kim, S-H., Kim, M.S., Sicher, R.C., Lary, D, Strem, M.D., Natarajan, S. and Bailey, B.A. (2008). The drought response of Theobroma cacao (cacao) and the regulation of genes involved in polyamine biosynthesis by drought and other stresses. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 46, 174–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balasimha, D., Daniel, E.V. and Prakash, B. (1991). Influence of environmental factor on photosynthesis in cocoa trees. Agriculture and Forest Meteorology 55, 15–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baligar, V., Bunce, J., Machado, R. and Elson, M. (2008). Photosynthetic photon flux density carbon, dioxide concentration and vapor pressure deficit effects on photosynthesis in cacao seedlings. Photosynthetica 46, 216–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertolde, F.Z., Almeida, A.-A.F., Pirovani, C.P., Gomes, F.P., Ahnert, D., Baligar, V.C. and Valle, R.R. (2012). Physiological and biochemical responses of Theobroma cacao L. genotypes to flooding. Photosynthetica 50, 447–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, M.M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72, 248–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruinsma, J. (1963). The quantitative analysis of chlorophylls a and b in plant extracts. Photochemistry and Photobiology 2, 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M.K.V. and Lockwood, G. (2011). The water relations and irrigation requirements of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.): a review. Experimental Agriculture 47, 653–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daymond, A.J., Hadley, P., Machado, R.C.R. and Ng, E. (2002a). Canopy characteristics of contrasting clones of cacao (Theobroma cacao). Experimental Agriculture 38, 359–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daymond, A., Hadley, P., Machado, R.C.R. and Ng, E. (2002b). Genetic variability in partitioning to the yield component of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.). HortScience 37, 799–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daymond, A., Tricker, P.J. and Hadley, P. (2011). Genotypic variation in photosynthesis in cacao is correlated with stomatal conductance and leaf nitrogen. Biologia Plantarum 55, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Almeida, J., Herrera, A. and Tezara, W. (2018). Phenotypic plasticity to photon flux density of physiological, anatomical and growth traits in a modern Criollo cocoa clone. Physiologia Plantarum 166(3), 821–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Almeida, J., Tezara, W. and Herrera, A. (2016). Physiological responses to drought and experimental water deficit and waterlogging of four clones of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) selected for cultivation in Venezuela. Agricultural Water Management 171, 80–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, P.C., Araujo, W.L., Moraes, G.A.B.K., Barros, R.S. and Damatta, F.M. (2007). Morphological and physiological responses of two coffee progenies to soil water availability. Journal of Plant Physiology 164, 1639–1647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
dos Santos, E.A., Almeida, A-A.Fd., Ahnert, D., Branco, M.C.d.S., Valle, R.R. and Baligar, V.C. (2016). Diallel analysis and growth parameters as selection tools for drought tolerance in young Theobroma cacao plants. PlosOne 11, 1–22. e0160647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebdon, J.S., Petrovic, A.M. and Dawson, T.E. (1998). Relationship between carbon isotope discrimination, water use efficiency, and evapotranspiration in Kentucky bluegrass. Crop Science 38, 57–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J.R. and von Caemmerer, S. (1996). Carbon dioxide diffusion inside leaves. Plant Physiology 110, 339–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farquhar, G.D., Ehlenringer, J.R. and Hubick, K.T. (1989). Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 40, 503–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farquhar, G.D. and Richards, R.A. (1984). Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 11, 539–552Google Scholar
García, J. and Moreno, L.P. (2016). Respuestas fisiológicas de Theobroma cacao L. en etapa de vivero a la disponibilidad de agua en el suelo. Acta Agronómica 65, 44–50.Google Scholar
Galyuon, I.K.A., McDavid, C.R., Lopez, F.B. and Spence, J.A. (1996). The effect of irradiance level on cacao (Theobroma cacao L.): II. Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence. Tropical Agriculture 73, 29–33.Google Scholar
Gornall, J., Betts, R., Burke, E., Clark, R., Camp, J., Willet, K. and Wiltshire, A. (2010). Implications of climate change for agricultural productivity in the early twenty-first century. Philosophical Transactions on the Royal Society 365, 2973–2989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hubick, K.T. and Farquhar, G.D. (1989). Carbon isotope discrimination and the range of carbon gained to water lost in barley cultivars. Plant, Cell and Environment 12, 795–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubick, K.T. and Gibson, A. (1993). Diversity in the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and transpiration efficiency when water is limited. In Ehleringer, J.R., Hall, A.E. and Farquhar, G.D. (eds), Stable Isotopes and Plant Carbon-Water Relations, 311–325, Academic Press, San Diego.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Cocoa Organization ICCO. (2019). Quarterly Bulletin of Cocoa Statistics, year 2017/2018. Available at htpps://ww.icco.org/statistics/other-statistical-data.html.Google Scholar
Joly, R.J. and Hahn, D.T. (1989). Net assimilation of cacao seedlings during periods of plant water deficit. Photosynthesis Research 21, 151–159.Google ScholarPubMed
Lawlor, D.W. and Tezara, W. (2009). Causes of decreased photosynthetic rate and metabolic capacity in water-deficient leaf cells, a critical evaluation of mechanisms and integration of processes. Annals of Botany 103, 561–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, S.C.V., Galmés, J., Cavatte, P.C., Pereira, L.F., Ventrella, M.C. and DaMatta, F.M. (2014). Understanding the low photosynthetic rates of sun and shade coffee leaves: bridging the gap on the relative roles of hydraulic, diffusive and biochemical constraints to photosynthesis. PlosOne 9, 1–10. e95571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medrano, H., Tomás, M., Martorell, S., Flexas, J., Hernández, E., Rosselló, J., Pou, A., Escalona, J.M. and Bota, J. (2015). From leaf to whole-plant water use efficiency (WUE) in complex canopies, limitations of leaf WUE as a selection target. The Crop Journal 3, 220–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohotti, A.J., Dennett, M.D. and Lawlor, D.W. (2000). Electron transport as a limitation to photosynthesis of Tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) 0. Kuntz): a Comparison with Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) with special reference to irradiance. Tropical Agricultural Research 12, 1–10.Google Scholar
Monti, A., Amaducci, M., Pritoni, G. and Venturi, G. (2006). Variation in carbon isotope discrimination during growth and at different organs in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Field Crops Research 98, 157–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motamayor, J.C., Lachenaud, P., da Silva e Mota, J.W., Loor, R., Kuhn, D.N., Brown, J.S. and Schnell, R.J. (2008). Geographic and genetic population differentiation of the Amazonian chocolate tree (Theobroma cacao L). PlosOne 3, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motamayor, J.C., Risterucci, A.M., Lopez, P.A., Ortiz, C.F., Moreno, A. and Lanaud, C. (2002). Cacao domestication I: the origin of the cacao cultivated by the Mayas. Heredity 89, 380–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rada, F., Jaimez, R.E., García-Nuñez, C., Azócar, A. and Ramírez, M.E. (2005). Relaciones hídricas e intercambio de gases en Theobroma cacao var. Guasare bajo períodos de déficit hídrico. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomía 22, 112–120.Google Scholar
Rajabi, A., Griffiths, H., Ober, E.S., Kromdijk, W. and Pidgeon, J.D. (2008). Genetic characteristics of water-use related traits in sugar beet. Euphytica 160, 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tezara, W., Marín, O., Rengifo, E., Martínez, D. and Herrera, A. (2005). Photosynthesis and Photoinhibition in two xerophytic species during drought. Photosynthetica 43, 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tezara, W., Mitchell, V., Driscoll, S.P. and Lawlor, D.W. (2002). Effects of water deficit and its interaction with CO2 supply on the biochemistry and physiology of photosynthesis in sunflower. Journal of Experimental Botany 53, 1781–1791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tezara, W., Urich, R., Jaimez, R., Coronel, I., Araque, O., Azócar, C. and Chacón, I. (2016). Does Criollo cocoa have the same ecophysiological characteristics than Forastero? Botanical Science 94, 563–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar