Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T21:09:15.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resource use efficiency in a cotton-wheat double-cropping system in the Yellow River Valley of China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2020

Guoping Wang ,
Yabing Li ,
Yingchun Han ,
Zhanbiao Wang ,
Beifang Yang ,
Xiaofei Li  and
Lu Feng Open the ORCID record for Lu Feng [Opens in a new window]
Guoping Wang
Affiliation:
Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan450000, P. R. China College of Agronomy, Key Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation of Hebei Province, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, Hebei071000, P. R. China
Yabing Li
Affiliation:
Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan450000, P. R. China
Yingchun Han
Affiliation:
Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan450000, P. R. China
Zhanbiao Wang
Affiliation:
Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan450000, P. R. China
Beifang Yang
Affiliation:
Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan450000, P. R. China
Xiaofei Li
Affiliation:
Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan450000, P. R. China
Lu Feng*
Affiliation:
Zhengzhou Research Base, State Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan450000, P. R. China
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The cotton-wheat double-cropping system is widely used in the Yellow River Valley of China, but whether and how different planting patterns within cotton-wheat double-cropping systems impact heat and light use efficiency have not been well documented. A field experiment investigated the effects of the cropping system on crop productivity and the capture and use efficiency of heat and light in two fields differing in soil fertility. Three planting patterns, namely cotton intercropped with wheat (CIW), cotton directly seeded after wheat (CDW), and cotton transplanted after wheat (CTW), as well as one cotton monoculture (CM) system were used. Cotton-wheat double cropping significantly increased crop productivity and land equivalent ratios relative to the CM system in both fields. As a result of increased growing degree days (GDD), intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (IPAR), and photothermal product (PTP), the capture of light and heat in the double-cropping systems was compared with that in the CM system in both fields. With improved resource capture, the double-cropping systems exhibited a higher light and heat use efficiency according to thermal product efficiency, solar energy use efficiency (Eu), radiation use efficiency (RUE), and PTP use efficiency (PTPU). The cotton lint yield and biomass were not significantly correlated with RUE across cropping patterns, indicating that RUE does not limit cotton production. Among the double-cropping treatments, CDW had the lowest GDD, IPAR, and PTP values but the highest heat and light resource use efficiency and highest overall resource use efficiency. This good performance was even more obvious in the high-fertility field. Therefore, we encourage the expanded use of CDW in the Yellow River Valley, especially in fields with high fertility, given the high productivity and resource use efficiency of this system. Moreover, the use of agronomic practices involving a reasonably close planting density, optimized irrigation and nutrient supply, and the application of new short-season varieties of cotton or wheat can potentially enhance CDW crop yields and productivity.

Keywords

CottonResource use efficiencyMonocultureWheat-cotton croppingSoil fertility
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , June 2020 , pp. 422 - 439
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, L.H., Sinclair, T.R. and Lemon, E.R. (1976). Radiation and microclimate relationships in multiple cropping systems. Multiple Cropping 171–200.Google Scholar
Awal, M.A., Koshi, H. and Ikeda, T. (2006). Radiation interception and use by maize/peanut intercrop canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 139, 74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, J.J., Mahan, J.R. and Hatfield, J.L. (1988). Crop-specific thermal kinetic windows in relation to wheat and cotton biomass production. Agronomy Journal 80(4), 553–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caviglia, O.P. and Andrade, F.H. (2010). Sustainable intensification of agriculture in the Argentinean Pampas: capture and use efficiency of environmental resources. The Americas Journal of Plant Science and Biotechnology 3, 1–8 (Global Sci. Books).Google Scholar
Caviglia, O.P., Sadras, V.O. and Andrade, F.H. (2004). Intensification of agriculture in the south-eastern Pampas I. Capture and efficiency in the use of water and radiation in double-cropped wheat-soybean. Field Crops Research 87, 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles-Edwards, D.A. and Lawn, R.J. (1984). Light interception by grain legume row crops. Plant Cell Environment 7, 247–251.Google Scholar
CRI (Cotton Research Institute Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences) (2013). Cultivation of Cotton in China. Shanghai, China:Shanghai Science and Technology Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
De Vries, S.C., Van de Ven, G.W., Van Ittersum, M.K. and Giller, K.E. (2010). Resource use efficiency and environmental performance of nine major biofuel crops, processed by first-generation conversion techniques. Biomass and Bioenergy 34(5), 588–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vries, S.C., Van de, V.E.N., Gerrie, W.J., Van Ittersum, M.K. and Giller, K.E. (2011). The production-ecological sustainability of cassava, sugarcane and sweet sorghum cultivation for bioethanol in Mozambique. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 4(1), 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, H.Z., Kong, X.Q., Li, W.J., Tang, W. and Zhang, D.M. (2010b). Effects of plant density and nitrogen and potassium fertilization on cotton yield and uptake of major nutrients in two fields with varying fertility. Field Crops Research 119, 106–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, X.B., Chen, B.L., Shen, T.Y., Zhang, Y.X. and Zhou, Z.G. (2015). Effect of cropping system on radiation use efficiency in double-cropped wheat–cotton. Field Crops Research 170, 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, M.S., Shen, J.B., Yuan, L.X., Jiang, R.F., Chen, X.P., Davies, J. W. and Zhang, F.S. (2011). Improving crop productivity and resource use efficiency to ensure food security and environmental quality in China. Journal of Experimental Botany 63(1), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feng, L., Wang, G.P., Han, Y.C., Li, Y.B., Zhu, Y., Zhou, Z.G. and Cao, W.X. (2017). Effects of planting pattern on growth and yield and economic benefits of cotton in a wheat-cotton double cropping system versus monoculture cotton. Field Crops Research 213, 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukai, S. and Trenbath, B.R. (1993). Processes determining intercrop productivity and yields of component crops. Field Crops Research 34, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George-Jaeggli, B., Jordan, D.R., Van Oosterom, E.J., Broad, I.J. and Hammer, G.L. (2013). Sorghum dwarfing genes can affect radiation capture and radiation use efficiency. Field Crops Research 149, 283–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonias, E.D., Oosterhuis, D.M. and Bibi, A.C. (2006). Radiation use efficiency of cotton in two contrasting environments. AAES Res. Ser.—Summ. Arkansas Cotton Research 552, 27–30.Google Scholar
Hook, J.E. and Gascho, G.J. (1988). Multiple cropping for efficient use of water and nitrogen. In Hargrove, W.L. (ed.), Cropping Strategies for Efficient Use of Water and Nitrogen. Madison, WI:ASA–CSSA–SSSA, pp. 7–20.Google Scholar
Jiang, H.S., Tang, Z.X. and Ge, Z.H. (1987). A preliminary study on the utilization of solar energy of the high yielding wheat in Huabei region. Journal of Nanjing Agriculture University 2, 17–24.Google Scholar
Keating, B.A. and Carberry, P.S. (1993), Resource capture and use in intercropping: solar radiation. Field Crops Research 34(3–4), 273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keerthi, P., Pannu, R.K., Singh, R. and Dhaka, A.K. (2016), Thermal requirements, heat use efficiency and plant responses of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) for different levels of nitrogen under different environments. Journal of Agrometeorology 18(2), 201.Google Scholar
Kintchéa, K., Guibertc, H., Sogbedji, J.M., Levêque, J., Bonfoh, B. and Tittonell, P. (2015). Long-term mineral fertiliser use and maize residue incorporation do not compensate for carbon and nutrient losses from a Ferralsol under continuous maize–cotton cropping. Field Crops Research 184, 192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., Chen, M., Zhang, Y., Fu, C., Xing, B., Li, W., Qian, J., Li, S., Wang, H., Fan, X., Yan, Y., Wang, Y. and Yang, X. (2015). Apple fruit diameter and length estimation by using the thermal and sunshine hours approach and its application to the digital orchard management information system. Plos One 10(4), e0120124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liakatas, A., Roussopoulos, D. and Whittington, W. J. (1998). Controlled-temperature effects on cotton yield and fiber properties. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 130(04), 463–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Y.H. (1990). Field Experimental Design and Analysis. Beijing, China:Agriculture Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Mao, L.L., Zhang, L.Z., Zhang, S.P., Jochem, B.E., Wopke, V.W., Wang, J.J., Sun, H.Q., Su, Z.C. and Huub, S. (2015). Resource use efficiency, ecological intensification and sustainability of intercropping systems. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 14(8), 1542–1550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mao, L.L., Zhang, L.Z., Zhao, X.H., Liu, S.D., Van der, W.W., Zhang, S.P., Spiertz, H. and Li, Z.H. (2014). Crop growth, light utilization and yield of relay intercropped cotton as affected by plant density and a plant growth regulator. Field Crops Research 155, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, J. and Low, A. (1972). Growing degree days as a measure of temperature effects on cotton. Cotton Growing Review 49(1), 39–49.Google Scholar
Midmore, D.J. (1993). Agronomic modification of resource use and intercrop productivity. Field Crops Research, 34(3–4), 357–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, S.P. and Bange, M.P. (2003). Nitrogen and light responses of cotton photosynthesis and implications for crop growth. Crop Science 43, 904–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, J.L. and Unsworth, M. (1990). Principles of Environmental Physics, 2nd Edn. London:Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Peng, S., Krieg, D. R. and Hicks, S.K. (1989). Cotton lint yield response to accumulated heat units and soil water supply. Field Crops Research 19(4), 253–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, V.R., Baker, D.N. and Hodges, H.F. (1991). Temperature effects on cotton canopy growth, photosynthesis, and respiration. Agronomy Journal 83(4), 699–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, K.R., Davidonis, G.H., Johnson, A.S. and Vinyard, B.T. (1999). Temperature regime and carbon dioxide enrichment alter cotton boll development and fiber properties. Agronomy Journal 91(5), 851–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, K.R., Reddy, V.R. and Hodges, H.F. (1992). Temperature effects on early season cotton growth and development. Agronomy Journal 84(2), 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roussopoulos, D., Liakatas, A. and Whittington, W.J. (1998). Controlled-temperature effects on cotton growth and development. The Journal of Agricultural Science 130(4), 451–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabu, T. (2013). Determination of resource use efficiency of rice farmers in Kaambe district of Guma local government area of Benue State, Nigeria. World Journal of Agricultural Research 1(6), 143–148.Google Scholar
Singh, R.J., Ahlawat, I.P.S. and Gangaiah, B. (2009). Remove from marked Records Direct and residual effects of nitrogen management in Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system. Indian Journal of Agronomy 54(4), 401–408.Google Scholar
Szumigalski, A.R. and Van Acker, R.C. (2006). Nitrogen yield and land use efficiency in annual sole crops and intercrops. Agronomy Journal 98(4), 1030–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tittonell, P., Vanlauwe, B., De Ridder, N. and Giller, K.E. (2007). Heterogeneity of crop productivity and resource use efficiency within smallholder Kenyan farms: Soil fertility gradients or management intensity gradients. Agricultural Systems 94(2), 376–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenbath, B.R. (1986). Resource use by intercrops. In Francis, C.A. (ed.), Multiple Cropping Systems. Macmillan, New York, pp. 57–81.Google Scholar
Tsubo, M., Walker, S. and Mukhala, E. (2001). Comparisons of radiation use efficiency of ono-/inter-cropping systems with different row orientations. Field Crops Research 71, 17–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der, W.A. (1996). Growth analysis and photo assimilate partitioning. In Zam-ski, E. and Schaffer, A.A. (eds), Photo Assimilate Distribution in Plants and Crops. Source–sink Relationships. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, NY, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Van Ittersum, M.K. and Rabbinge, R. (1997). Concepts in production ecology for analysis and quantification of agricultural input–output combinations. Field Crops Research 52, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Opstal, N.V., Caviglia, O.P. and Melchiori, R.J.M. (2011). Water and solar radiation productivity of double-crops in a humid temperature area. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5, 1760–1766.Google Scholar
Waddle, B.A. (1984). Crop Growing Practices. In Kohel, R.J. and Lewis, C.F. (eds), Cotton. Madison: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, pp. 233–263.Google Scholar
Willey, R.W. (1985). Evaluation and presentation of intercropping advantages. Experimental Agriculture 21(02), 119–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R.W. (1990). Resource use in intercropping systems. Agricultural Water Management 17, 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wopereis, M.C.S., Tamélokpo, A., Ezui, K., Gnakpénou, D., Fofana, B. and Breman, H. (2006). Mineral fertilizer management of maize on farmer fields differing in organic inputs in the West African savanna. Field Crops Research 96(2), 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, W.X., Niu, X.X. and Bian, X.J. (2007). The calculations and analyses on thermal production potential of cotton in Xinjiang. Cotton Science 19(6), 455–460.Google Scholar
Yeates, S.J., Constable, G.A. and McCumstie, T. (2010). Irrigated cotton in the tropical dry season. II: Biomass accumulation, partitioning and RUE. Field Crops Research 116, 290–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., van der Werf, W., Zhang, S., Li, B. and Spiertz, J.H.J. (2008). Light interception and utilization in relay intercrops of wheat and cotton. Field Crops Research 107, 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., van der Werf, W., Zhang, S., Li, B. and Spiertz, J.H.J. (2007). Growth, yield and quality of wheat and cotton in relay strip intercropping systems. Field Crops Research 103, 178–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Z.J., Zhang, H.X., Yang, J.C., Song, Y.S., Zhao, B.H., Ji, H.J. and Zhu, Q.S. (2011). Changes of safe dates for full heading in Japonica Rice over Past 50 Years in Jiangsu Province. Acta Agronomica Sinica 37(1), 146–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, W.Q., Meng, Y.L., Li, W.F., Chen, B.L., Xu, N.Y., Wang, Y.H. and Zhou, Z.G. (2012). A model for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fiber length and strength formation considering temperature-radiation and N nutrient effects. Ecological Modelling 243, 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhi, X.Y., Han, Y.C., Mao, S.C., Wang, G.P., Feng, L., Yang, B.F., Fan, Z.Y., Du, W.L., Lu, J.H. and Li, Y.B. (2014). Light spatial distribution in the canopy and crop development in cotton. Plos One 9(11), e113409.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zingore, S., Murwira, H.K., Delve, R.J. and Giller, K.E. (2007), Influence of nutrient management strategies on variability of soil fertility, crop yields and nutrient balances on smallholder farms in Zimbabwe. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 119(1), 112–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar