Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T17:37:46.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Participatory plant breeding: Who did it, who does it and where?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2019

Salvatore Ceccarelli Open the ORCID record for Salvatore Ceccarelli [Opens in a new window]  and
Stefania Grando
Salvatore Ceccarelli*
Affiliation:
Consultant, Rete Semi Rurali, Scandicci 50018, Italy
Stefania Grando
Affiliation:
Independent Consultant, Ascoli Piceno 63100, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper provides an overview of institutions, scientists, and practitioners involved over the years in the various ways in which participatory plant breeding (PPB) is implemented, with indication of the crops involved and the countries in which it took place, or is still taking place. This might help creating a better awareness of the scope (both geographical and crop wise) of the different methodologies as well as of their advantages, disadvantages, applicability, and limitations. Through a literature survey, we found 254 publications showing that over a period of 36 years participatory approaches in plant breeding have been used in 69 countries (10 developed and 59 developing) with 47 crops including self-pollinated, cross-pollinated, and vegetatively propagated crops, by several Institutions including CGIAR centers, universities, and NGOs. We argue that there are no obvious scientific or technical reasons limiting the use of PPB, and we interpret the limited institutionalization as a difficulty to accept the paradigm shift that participation implies.

Keywords

ParticipationParticipatory variety selectionparticipatory plant breeding
Type
Review
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 1 - 11
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashby, J.A. and Lilja, N. (2004). Participatory Research: Does It Work? Evidence from Participatory Plant Breeding, New directions for a Diverse Planet, Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, 26 Sep–1 Oct 2004, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Ashby, J.A. and Sperling, L. (1995). Institutionalizing participatory, client-driven research and technology development in agriculture. Development and Change 26, 753–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellon, M.R. (2006). Crop research to benefit poor farmers in marginal areas of the developing world: a review of technical challenges and tools. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 1, No 070, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneuil, C. and Demeulenaere, E. (2007). Une génétique de pair à pair? L’émergence de la sélection participative. In Charvolin, F., Micoud, A. andNyhart, L.K. (eds), Les sciences citoyennes. Vigilance collective et rapport entre profane et scientifique dans les sciences naturalists, LaTour-D’Aigues, France: Edition de l’Aube, pp. 122–147.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, S. (2015). Efficiency of plant breeding. Crop Science 55, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceccarelli, S., Al Yassin, A., Goldringer, I., Mendes Moreira, P. and Chable, V. (2013). Analysis of Major Participatory Plant Breeding Worldwide. Available at https://prodinra.inra.fr/ft?id=A3E52EA1-0BF8-40E7-8A78-2BBBC5FF912B. Accessed 26 November 2018Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, S. and Grando, S. (2019). From participatory to evolutionary plant breeding. In Westengen, O. and Winge, T. (eds), Farmer Participation in Plant Breeding: Current Approaches and Perspectives, Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S., Singh, M., Michael, M., Shikho, A., Al Issa, M., Al Saleh, A., Kaleonjy, G., Al Ghanem, S.M., Al Hasan, A.L., Dalla, H., Basha, S. and Basha, T. (2003). A methodological study on participatory barley breeding. II. Response to selection. Euphytica 133, 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, T.A. (2014). Bringing science and technology studies into agricultural anthropology: Technology development as cultural encounter between farmers and researchers. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment 36, 45–55.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, D. (1993). Farmers deskilled: Hybrid corn and farmers’ work. Technology and Culture 34, 324–343.Google Scholar
Galluzzi, G., Estrada, R., Apaza, V., Gamarra, M., Pérez, A., Gamarra, G., Altamirano, A., Cáceres, G., Gonza, V., Sevilla, R., López Noriega, I. and Jäger, M. (2014). Participatory breeding in the Peruvian highlands: Opportunities and challenges for promoting conservation and sustainable use of underutilized crops. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 30, 408–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R.W., Mpembe, I. and Mwanga, R.O.M. (2011). Benefits of participatory plant breeding (PPB) as exemplified by the first-ever officially released PPB-bred sweet potato cultivar. The Journal of Agricultural Science 149, 625–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gyawali, S., Sthapit, B.R., Bhandari, B., Bajracharya, J., Shrestha, P.K., Upadhyay, M.P. and Jarvis, D.J. (2010). Participatory crop improvement and formal release of Jethobudho rice landrace in Nepal. Euphytica 176, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlan, H.V. and Martini, M.L. (1929). A composite hybrid mixture. Journal of American Society of Agronomy 21, 487–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, K.D., Devkota, K.P., Harris, D., Khanal, N.P., Paudyal, B., Sapkota, A. and Witcombe, J.R. (2012). Participatory research approaches rapidly improve household food security in Nepal and identify policy changes required for institutionalization. Field Crops Research 131, 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, K.D., Subedi, M., Rana, R.B., Kadayat, K.B. and Sthapit, B.R. (1997). Enhancing on-farm varietal diversity through participatory varietal selection: A case study for chaite rice in Nepal. Experimental Agriculture 33, 335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloppenburg, J. (2010). Impeding dispossession, enabling repossession: biological open source and the recovery of seed sovereignty. Journal of Agrarian Change 10, 367–388.Google Scholar
Laurie, S.M. and Magoro, M.D. (2008). Evaluation and release of new sweet potato varieties through farmer participatory selection. African Journal of Agricultural Research 3, 672–676.Google Scholar
Mangione, D., Senni, S., Puccioni, M., Grando, S. and Ceccarelli, S. (2006). The cost of participatory barley breeding. Euphytica 150, 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, K., Lammer, D., Lyon, S., Carter, B. and Jones, S.S. (2005). Breeding for organic and low-input farming systems: An evolutionary-participatory breeding method for inbred cereal grains. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20, 48–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoades, R.E. and Booth, R.H. (1982). Farmer-back-to-farmer: a model for generating acceptable agricultural technology. Agricultural Administration 11, 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoades, R.E., Horton, D.E. and Booth, R.H. (1986). Anthropologist, biological scientist and economist: The three musketeers or three stooges of farming systems research? In Jones, J.R. and Wallace, B.J. (eds), Social Sciences and Farming System Research. Methodological Perspectives on Agricultural Development, Boulder: Westview Press, pp. 21–40.Google Scholar
Shelton, A.C. and Tracy, W.F. (2016). Participatory plant breeding and organic agriculture: A synergistic model for organic variety development in the United States. Elementa Science in the Anthropocene 4, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suneson, C.A. (1956). An evolutionary plant breeding method. Agronomy Journal 48, 188–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M., Dawson, J.C., Goldringer, I. and Bonneuil, C. (2011). Seed exchanges, a key to analyze crop diversity dynamics in farmer-led on-farm conservation. Genet Resources Crop Evolution 58, 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufan, H.A., Grando, S. and Meola, C. (eds) (2018). State of the Knowledge for Gender in Breeding: Case Studies for Practitioners. Lima (Peru): CGIAR Gender and Breeding Initiative. Working Paper. No. 3. Available at www.rtb.cgiar.org/gender-breeding-initiative Accessed 26 November 2018Google Scholar
Walker, T.S. (2006). Participatory varietal selection, participatory plant breeding, and varietal change. Background paper for the World Development Report 2008. Washington, DC: World Bank.© World Bank, License: CC BY 3.0 IGO Available at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/9182. Accessed 26 November 2018Google Scholar
Weltzien, R.E., Smith, M.E., Meitzner, L.S. and Sperling, L. (2003). Technical and institutional issues in participatory plant breeding-from the perspective of formal plant breeding: A global analysis of issues, results, and current experience. In PRGA Program Coordination Office (ed), CGIAR System wide Program on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovation. PPB Monograph no. 1. Cali, CO: Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), 208 pp. ().Google Scholar
Witcombe, J.R. and Yadavendra, J.P. (2014). How much evidence is needed before client-oriented breeding (COB) is institutionalized? Evidence from rice and maize in India. Field Crops Research 167, 143–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zystro, J., Colley, M. and Dawson, J.C. (2019). Alternative experimental designs for plant breeding. Plant Breeding Reviews 42, 87–117.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ceccarelli and Grando supplementary material

Appendix II

Download Ceccarelli and Grando supplementary material(File)
File 37.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Ceccarelli and Grando supplementary material

Appendix I

Download Ceccarelli and Grando supplementary material(File)
File 56.8 KB