Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T21:52:27.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intercropped Corn–Soyabean Density Studies. I. Yield Complementarity†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

D. H. Putnam ,
S. J. Herbert  and
A. Vargas
D. H. Putnam
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
S. J. Herbert
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
A. Vargas
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Intercropped corn and soyabean were grown in a randomized block design (RBD) and a systematic design (SD) in 1981 and 1982 to evaluate total yield, yield complementarity, crop competition and land-use efficiency as affected by corn and soyabean densities. In the RBD, three corn density treatments were applied to corn–corn–soyabean–soyabean, corn–corn–soyabean, and corn–soyabean intercrop row patterns and to monocultures. In the SD, 9 or 10 corn densities were factorially combined with up to 13 soyabean densities in a corn–soyabean row pattern (91 cm spacing). In the RBD, total intercrop yields were similar to corn monoculture yields (60.8 to 62.7 t ha−1 in 1981) in the corn–corn–soyabean and corn–soyabean patterns at high corn densities but were less at low density. The corn–corn–soyabean–soyabean pattern yielded 87% of the corn monoculture at high density in 1982. These results were confirmed in the SD, where total intercrop yields were highly responsive to corn density and poorly responsive to soyabean densities. Both experiments indicated that high corn row densities are needed to maintain yields in corn–soyabean intercrops, possibly higher than the levels studied. Land equivalent ratios were above 1.0 for all but the low density corn–corn–soyabean–soyabean pattern in the RBD. The ability of an intercrop with as many as half the corn rows replaced by soyabean to produce yields similar to corn monoculture indicates a biological complementarity for dry matter production in the mixtures.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 1985 , pp. 41 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmed, S. & Rao, M. R. (1982). Performance of maize-soybean intercrop combination in the Tropics: Results of a multi-location study. Field Crops Research 5:147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, M. W. & Genter, C. F. (1962). Production of corn and soybeans in alternating pairs of rows. Agronomy Journal 54:233–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleasdale, J. K. A. (1967). Systematic designs for spacing experiments. Experimental Agriculture 3:73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crookston, R. K. & Hill, D. S. (1979). Grain yields and land equivalent ratios from intercropping corn and soybeans in Minnesota. Agronomy Journal 71:41–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, D. G. (1973). Interplanting of corn, sorghum, and soybeans for silage. Research Bulletin 150, Dec. 1973. Georgia Experiment Station, Experiment, GA 30212.Google Scholar
De Wit, C. T. (1960). On competition. Verslagen Landbouwkundig Onderzoek 66:1–82.Google Scholar
Duncan, W. G. (1969). Cultural manipulation for higher yields. In Physiological Aspects of Crop Yield (Eds Easton, J. D., Haskins, F. A., Sullivan, C. Y. and Van Bovel, C. H. M.). Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Fisher, N. M. (1977). Studies in mixed cropping II. Population pressures in maize-bean mixtures. Experimental Agriculture 13:185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, N. M. (1979). Studies in mixed cropping III. Further results with maize-bean mixtures. Experimental Agriculture 15:49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herbert, S. J., Putnam, D. H., Poos-Floyd, M. I. & Creighton, J. F. (1984). Forage yield of intercropped corn and soybean in various planting patterns. Agronomy Journal 76:(in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, P. A. & Maingu, Z. (1978). Use of a systematic spacing design as an aid to the study of intercropping. Some general considerations. Experimental Agriculture 14:49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, R. & Riley, J. (1981). A review of statistical ideas relevant to intercropping research. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series A) 144:462–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, R. & Stem, R. D. (1980). Designing experiments for intercropping research. Experimental Agriculture 16:329–342.Google Scholar
Mead, R. & Willey, R. W. (1980). The concept of a ‘Land Equivalency Ratio’ and advantages in yields from intercropping. Experimental Agriculture 16:217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohta, N. K. & De, R. (1980). Intercropping maize and sorghum with soya beans. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95:117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelder, J. A. (1962). New kinds of systematic designs for spacing experiments. Biometrics 18:283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendleton, J. W., Bolen, C. D. & Seif, R. D. (1963). Alternating strips of corn and soybeans vs. solid plantings. Agronomy Journal 55:293–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogue, D. E. & Arnold, B. L. (1979). Corn-soybean silage compared with corn silage for milk production. Research Report, May 1979. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Wahua, T. A. T. & Miller, D. A. (1978). Relative yield totals and yield components of intercropped sorghum and soybeans. Agronomy Journal 70:287–291.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. (1979). Intercropping – its importance and research needs. Part 1. Competition and yield advantages. Field Crop Abstracts 32:1–10.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. & Heath, S. B. (1969). The quantitative relationships between plant population and crop yield. Advances in Agronomy 21:281–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R. W. & Osiru, D. S. O. (1972). Studies on mixtures of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79:517–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R. W. & Rao, M. R. (1980). A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Experimental Agriculture 16:117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar