Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:35:31.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Soil-applied Micronutrients on Cassava (Manihot esculenta) in Malaysian Tropical Oligotrophic Peat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

W. Y. Chew ,
K. T. Joseph  and
K. Ramli
W. Y. Chew
Affiliation:
Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Peat Research Station, Jalan Kebun, Kelang, Selangor, Malaysia
K. T. Joseph
Affiliation:
Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Peat Research Station, Jalan Kebun, Kelang, Selangor, Malaysia
K. Ramli
Affiliation:
Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Peat Research Station, Jalan Kebun, Kelang, Selangor, Malaysia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two experiments to investigate the micronutrient requirements of cassava (cv Black Twig) on Malaysian peat soil are described. Cu was found to be the only essential micronutrient and Mn, Zn, Fe, Mo and B were not needed. Fertilizing with 20 kg/ha of copper sulphate approximately tripled tuber dry matter, and starch and Cu uptake, but applying 10 kg/ha of copper sulphate gave the same results. Each crop of cassava absorbed only about 2% of the applied Cu, giving a leaf Cu content of about 14 ppm compared with about 7 ppm in Cu-deficient plants. Cu deficiency symptoms were invariably observed in Cu-deficient plots and these are also described.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 1978 , pp. 105 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chew, W. Y. (1971). Malay. Agric. J. 48, 142.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. E. & Nair, C. K. W. (1950). In Copper Metabolism (eds. McElroy, & Glass, ). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Hupkens van der Elst, F. C. C. (1972). Proc. 4th Int. Peat Congr. 3, 21.Google Scholar
Joseph, K. T., Hussein, S. & Williams, C. N. (1970). Malay. Agric. J. 47, 338.Google Scholar
Joseph, K. T., Chew, W. Y. & Tay, T. H. (1974). MARDI Rep. 16, MARDI, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.Google Scholar
Kanapathy, K. (1972). Malay. Agric. J. 48, 249.Google Scholar
Liwski, S. (1964). In Peat Abstr., Summer (3), 9.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. & Knezek, B. D. (1972). In Micronutrients in Agriculture 12, 265. Madison, Wis.: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E., Rieke, P. E., Shickluna, J. C. & Cole, A. (1975). In Peat in Horticulture 4, 51. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, L. S. & Walsh, L. M. (1972). In Micronutrients in Agriculture 15, 347. Madison, Wis.: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer.Google Scholar
No, S. K. & Tan, Y. P. (1974). Oleagineux 29, 1.Google Scholar
Parbery, C. B. & Venkatachalam, R. M. (1964). J. Trop. Geogr. 18, 125.Google Scholar