Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T10:17:03.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

GROUNDNUT YIELD RESPONSE AND ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF FUNGICIDE AND PHOSPHORUS APPLICATION IN FARMER-MANAGED TRIALS IN NORTHERN GHANA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2009

J. B. NAAB ,
S. S. SEINI ,
K. O. GYASI ,
G. Y. MAHAMA ,
P. V. V. PRASAD ,
K. J. BOOTE  and
J. W. JONES
J. B. NAAB*
Affiliation:
Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Wa Experiment Station, POB 494, Wa, Ghana
S. S. SEINI
Affiliation:
Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Wa Experiment Station, POB 494, Wa, Ghana
K. O. GYASI
Affiliation:
Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Wa Experiment Station, POB 494, Wa, Ghana
G. Y. MAHAMA
Affiliation:
Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, Wa Experiment Station, POB 494, Wa, Ghana
P. V. V. PRASAD
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA
K. J. BOOTE
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
J. W. JONES
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
*
‡Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Prior on-station research showed that sowing dates, sowing density and applications of fungicide and phosphorus (P) increased groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) pod yield by 60–80%. Farmer-managed trials were conducted in the Wa district of the Upper West Region of Ghana from 2004 to 2007 to test the yield response to sowing density, fungicide and P and to assess economic returns of these technologies to farmers. Treatments included: an early maturing groundnut cultivar, Chinese, sown at farmers' density (5–8 plant m−2) without fungicide and without P application (T1, control), with fungicide sprays alone (T2), or with fungicide and P application (T3), cultivar Chinese sown at recommended (higher) density (20 plant m−2) with fungicide and P application (T4), and a full season cultivar, Manipinter, with fungicide and P application (T5). Soil fertility, sowing density, days from sowing to first weeding, incidence and severity of leaf-spot disease and plant population at final harvest were recorded. Relative to farmers' practice, pod yield of cultivar Chinese was significantly increased by 80% with fungicide sprays alone, 108% with fungicide and P application, and 113% with fungicide and P application at higher sowing density. Cultivar Manipinter treated with fungicide and P gave 107% increase in pod yield relative to farmers' practice. Correlation and stepwise regression analyses suggested that major determinants of groundnut pod yield in farmers' fields were plant density, leaf-spot disease and P availability. The increase in yield with fungicide and P application translated into a 4–5-fold increase in gross margin for farmers in the region. Returns to labour and labour productivity were doubled with combined use of fungicide and P fertilizer.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , October 2009 , pp. 385 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, M. J., Harch, G. and Wright, G. C. (1991). Plant population studies on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in subtropical Australia. I. Growth under fully irrigated conditions. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31:535–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, S., Kumar, S. and Singh, A. K. (1998). Management of Cercospora leaf-spot of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) with a single fungicidal spray. International Journal of Pest Management 44:135–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiteka, Z. A., Gorbet, D. W., Shokes, F. M. and Kucharek, T. A. (1997). Components of resistance to early leaf-spot in peanut – genetic variability and heritability. Soil and Crop Science Society of Florida Proceedings 56: 63–68.Google Scholar
CIMMYT (1988). From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economics Training Manual, 30–31, Completely Revised Edition. Mexico, D. F.Google Scholar
FAO (2007). Food and Agricultural Organization Production Year Book 2007. Rome, Italy, FAO.Google Scholar
Gascho, G. J. and Davis, J. G. (1994). Mineral nutrition. In The Groundnut Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement, 214–254 (Ed. Smartt, J.), London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gascho, G. J. and Davis, J. G. (1995). Soil fertility and plant nutrition. In Advances in Peanut Science, 383–418 (Eds. Pattee, H. E. and Stalker, H. T.), Stillwater, OK, USA: American Peanut Research and Education Society.Google Scholar
Hafner, H., Ndunguru, B. J., Bationo, A. and Marschner, H. (1992). Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus, and molybdenum application on growth and symbiotic N2-fixation of groundnut in an acid sandy soil in Niger. Nutrient Cycling and Agroecosystems 31: 69–77.Google Scholar
Kannaiyan, J. and Haciwa, H. C. (1990). Economic benefits of spraying fungicides to control groundnut foliar disease in Zambia. Tropical Pest Management 36: 21–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, M. A. and Venkatachari, A. (1971). Studies on the effect of intra-row spacing and fertility levels on the yield and quality of two varieties of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 5: 67–79.Google Scholar
Lombin, G. and Singh, L. (1986). Fertilizer response of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) under continuous intensive cultivation in the Nigerian savannah. Fertilizer Research 10: 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, D., Subrahmanyam, P., Gibbons, R. W. and Smith, D. H. (1985). Early and late leaf spots of groundnut. Information Bulletin No. 21, Patancheru, India, International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics.Google Scholar
Naab, J. B., Tsigbey, F. K., Prasad, P. V. V., Boote, K. J., Bailey, J. E. and Brandenburg, R. L. (2005). Effects of sowing date and fungicide application on yield of early and late maturing peanut cultivars grown under rainfed condition in Ghana. Crop Protection 24: 325–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naab, J. B., Boote, K. J., Prasad, P. V. V., Seini, S. S. and Jones, J. W. (2009). Influence of fungicide and sowing density on the growth and yield of early and late maturing groundnut cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science Cambridge 147: 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nutsugah, S. K., Tsigbey, F. K. and Marfo, K. O. (1998). Effect of neem extract and two systemic fungicides on foliar diseases of groundnuts in a savannah zone of Ghana. International Arachis Newsletter 18: 44–45.Google Scholar
Pande, S., Narayana Rao, J., Upadhyaya, H. D. and Lenne, J. M. (2001). Farmers’ participatory integrated management of foliar diseases of groundnut. International Journal of Pest Management 47: 121–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute, (2002) The SAS System for Microsoft Windows, Release 8.2 Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Singh, P., Boote, K. J., Yogeswara Rao, A., Iruthayaraj, M. R., Sheikh, A. M., Hundal, S. S., Narang, R. S. and Phool, S. (1994). Evaluation of the groundnut model PNUTGRO for crop response to water availability, sowing dates, and seasons. Field Crops Research 39: 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. H. (1984). Early and late leaf spots. In Compendium of Peanut Diseases (Eds. Porter, D. M., Smith, D. H. and Rodriguez-Kabana, R.). St. Paul, MN, USA: American Phytopathological Society.Google Scholar
Smith, D. H. and Littrell, R. H. (1980). Management of peanut foliar diseases. Plant Disease 64: 356–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, M. E., Kvien, C. S., Smal, H. and Csinos, A. S. (1988). On the calcium nutrition of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). I. Operation model. Journal of Fertilizer Issues 5: 97–102.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, P., Greenberg, D. C., Savary, S. and Bosc, J. P. (1991). Diseases of groundnut in West Africa and their management: research priorities and strategies. Tropical Pest Management 37: 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsigbey, F. K. (1996). Integrated disease management in groundnut: effects of neem seed extract, Bavistin and Topsin-M on foliar diseases of groundnut. Annual Report, Tamale, Ghana, Savanna Agricultural Research Institute, pp. 126–130.Google Scholar
Tsigbey, F. K., Bailey, J. E. and Nutsugah, S. K. (2001). The lost harvest: Impact of peanut diseases in Northern Ghana and Strategies for management. Paper presented at the 39th Congress of the Southern Africa Society of Plant Pathologists, 22–24 January, 2001, Johannesburg, South Africa.Google Scholar
Waliyar, F. (1991). Evaluation of yield losses due to groundnut leaf diseases in West Africa, 32–33. In Summary Proceedings of the second ICRISAT Regional Groundnut Meeting for West Africa, 11–14 September 1990, Niamey, Niger. ICRISAT, Patancheru, India.Google Scholar
Waliyar, F., Adomou, M. and Traore, A. (2000). Rational use of fungicide applications to maximize peanut yield under foliar disease pressure in West Africa. Plant Disease 84: 1203–1211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed