Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T09:24:12.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EFFECTS OF TILLAGE METHODS ON WHEAT YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS IN CONTINUOUS WHEAT CROPPING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2002

M. J. Bahrani
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
M. Kheradnam
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Y. Emam
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
H. Ghadiri
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
M. T. Assad
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

Abstract

A three-year field experiment was undertaken to evaluate the effects of tillage methods on grain yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum) in continuous cropping. The experiment was conducted on a Ramjerd, fine, mixed, mesic, typic Calcixerepts soil. Wheat was sown: (1) after burning residues followed by conventional tillage, (2) after complete residue removal followed by conventional tillage, (3) after soil incorporation of residues followed by conventional tillage, (4) into untilled residues, (5) using chisel seeder after field irrigation, (6) using chisel seeder plus herbicide application, and (7) after disking. Residue burning and removal increased spikes per square metre, grain per spike, 1000-grain weight, grain yield and harvest index compared with other treatments. This was due primarily to weed interference and lack of uniform crop establishment in the presence of residues. Reduced tillage methods retained more residues on the soil surface, which provided unsuitable conditions for crop emergence and growth. The incorporation of residues led to a build up of carbon in the soil, with lower grain yields compared with residue burning and removal, but these yields were higher than those of chisel-seeded plots.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)