Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T15:37:22.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution and Weight of Nodules in Tropical Pasture Legumes in The Field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

P. C. Whiteman
P. C. Whiteman
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O., Division of Tropical Pastures, Cunningham Laboratory, Mill Road, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In tropical legume-grass swards random core sampling recovered too few nodules to be a useful method. Core sampling of individual plants with a 5·0 cm. Stace tube showed similar changes in nodulation as total root excavation. However, the nodule distribution was different on the root systems of the two species studied, Desmodium uncinatum and Phaseolus atropurpureus. Nodule weights per plant on these species were much higher than any previously recorded in the literature. The direct contribution from nodule decay to the total end-of-season nitrogen release was estimated and shown to be small, approximately 14 per cent for D. uncinatum and 8 per cent for P. atropurpureus.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1971 , pp. 75 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Butler, G. W. & Bathurst, N. O. (1956). 7th Int. Grassland Congress, 168.Google Scholar
Butler, G. W., Greenwood, R. M. & Soper, K. (1959). N. Z. J. agric. Res. 2, 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, G. D. (1959). Qld J. agric. Sci. 16, 253.Google Scholar
Gibson, A. H. (1963). Aust. J. biol. Sci. 16, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henzell, E. F., Martin, A. E., Ross, P. J. & Haydock, K. P. (1968). Aust. J. agric. Res. 19, 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. J. (1967). Aust. J. expl agric. Anim. Husb. 7, 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masefield, G. B. (1952). Emp. J. expl Agric. 20, 175.Google Scholar
Masefield, G. B. (1955). Emp. J. expl Agric. 23, 17.Google Scholar
Masefield, G. B. (1957). Emp. J. expl Agric. 25, 139.Google Scholar
Masefield, G. B. (1958). Nutrition of the Legumes. Ed. Hallsworth, E. G., 202. London: Butterworths Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Masefield, G. B. (1965). Expl Agric. 1, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masefield, G. B. (1968). Expl Agric. 4, 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, E. W. (1961). Soil Conditions and Plant Growth. 9th Ed.London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Schuurman, J. J. & Goedewaagen, M. A. (1964). Methods for the Examination of Root Systems and Roots. Wageningen: Centre Agric. Public. and Document.Google Scholar
Shimshi, D., Schiffmann, J., Kost, Y., Bielorai, H. & Alper, Y. (1967). Agron. J. 59, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stace, H. C. T. & Palm, A. W. (1962). Aust. J. expl agric. Anim. Husb. 2, 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiteman, P. C. (1968). Aust. J. expl agric. Anim. Husb., 9, 287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, D. J. B. (1958). J. Br. Grassld Soc. 13, 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar