Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:34:35.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition dynamics of Parthenium hysterophorus in direct-seeded aerobic rice fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2019

Ali A. Bajwa Open the ORCID record for Ali A. Bajwa [Opens in a new window] ,
Aman Ullah ,
Muhammad Farooq ,
Bhagirath S. Chauhan  and
Steve Adkins
Ali A. Bajwa*
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia The Centre for Crop Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia
Aman Ullah
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad38040, Pakistan
Muhammad Farooq
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad38040, Pakistan Department of Crop Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud, 123 Muscat, Oman The UWA Institute of Agriculture, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA6009, Australia
Bhagirath S. Chauhan
Affiliation:
The Centre for Crop Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia
Steve Adkins
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia The Centre for Crop Science, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia
*
*Corresponding author. Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Parthenium hysterophorus is a prolific invasive weed species, which infests many crops in over 40 countries around the world. A 2-year field study was carried out to quantify the potential impacts of this weed on direct-seeded rice. Parthenium weed was allowed to compete for 2, 4, 6 or 8 weeks after crop emergence, while full season weedy and weed-free plots were maintained as controls. Parthenium weed plants grew taller and attained more biomass as the competition duration prolonged. The yield and yield-related attributes of rice were negatively affected with increasing competition duration. The season-long competition caused the highest reductions in panicle number (28–34%), panicle length (26–27%), grains per panicle (22–23%) and grain yield (33 and 38%) of rice in both years. Weed competition for 2–8 weeks caused 5–34% and 6–33% losses in rice grain yield during both years, respectively. Importantly, Parthenium weed control after 8 weeks of competition did not improve rice yield significantly. The results suggested that Parthenium weed should be controlled in rice fields between 4 and 8 weeks after crop emergence under direct-seeded conditions to avoid over 10% yield losses.

Keywords

Aerobic riceParthenium weedWeed competition
Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 196 - 203
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Current affiliation: Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute, NSW Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga, NSW 2650, Australia

References

Adkins, S.W., McClay, A. and Bajwa, A.A. (2018). Biology and ecology. In Adkins, S.W., Shabbir, A. and Dhileepan, K. (eds), Parthenium Weed: Biology, Ecology and Management. Oxfordshire, UK: CABI, pp. 7–39.Google Scholar
Annapurna, C. and Singh, J.S. (2003). Variation of Parthenium hysterophorus in response to soil quality: implications for invasiveness. Weed Research 43, 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anwar, M.P., Juraimi, A.S., Samedani, B., Puteh, A. and Man, A. (2012). Critical period of weed control in aerobic rice. Scientific World Journal. doi: 10.1100/2012/603043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asif, M., Ayub, M., Tanveer, A. and Akhtar, J. (2017). Estimating yield losses and economic threshold level of Parthenium hysterophorus in forage sorghum. Planta Daninha 35, e017164158. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582017350100038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, A.A., Chauhan, B.S. and Adkins, S.W. (2017). Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of two Australian biotypes of Parthenium hysterophorus to different soil moisture regimes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24, 16186–16194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bajwa, A.A., Chauhan, B.S. and Adkins, S.W. (2018). Germination ecology of two Australian biotypes of ragweed parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus) relates to their invasiveness. Weed Science 66, 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, A.A., Chauhan, B.S., Farooq, M., Shabbir, A. and Adkins, S.W. (2016). What do we really know about alien plant invasion? A review of the invasion mechanism of one of the world’s worst weeds. Planta 244, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bajwa, A.A., Ullah, A., Farooq, M., Chauhan, B.S. and Adkins, S.W. (2019a). Effect of different densities of parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) on the performance of direct-seeded rice under aerobic conditions. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 65, 796–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, A.A., Ullah, A., Farooq, M., Chauhan, B.S. and Adkins, S.W. (2019b). Chemical control of parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) in two contrasting cultivars of rice under direct-seeded conditions. Crop Protection 117, 26–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bajwa, A.A., Wang, H., Chauhan, B.S. and Adkins, S.W. (2019c). Effect of elevated carbon dioxide concentration on growth, productivity and glyphosate response of parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.). Pest Management Science. In press. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belz, R.G., Reinhardt, C.F., Foxcroft, L.C. and Hurle, K. (2007). Residue allelopathy in Parthenium hysterophorus L.-does parthenin play a leading role? Crop Protection 26, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biswas, O., Paul, K.P., Ghosh, S. and Karim, S.R. (2010). Allelopathic effects of parthenium weed debris in soil on the emergence and development of rice. Journal of Agroforestry and Environment 4, 193–196.Google Scholar
Farooq, M., Bajwa, A.A., Cheema, S.A. and Cheema, Z.A. (2013). Application of allelopathy in crop production. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 15, 1367–1378.Google Scholar
Farooq, M., Siddique, K.H., Rehman, H., Aziz, T., Lee, D.J. and Wahid, A. (2011). Rice direct seeding: experiences, challenges and opportunities. Soil & Tillage Research 111, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matloob, A., Khaliq, A. and Chauhan, B.S. (2015). Weeds of direct-seeded rice in Asia: problems and opportunities. Advances in Agronomy 130, 291–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moody, K. (1993). Weed control in wet-seeded rice. Experimental Agriculture 29, 393–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, P.K., Sarkar, A. and Maity, S.K. (2008). Critical period of crop-weed competition in transplanted and wet-seeded kharif rice (Oryza sativa L.) under terai conditions. Indian Journal of Weed Science 40, 112–116.Google Scholar
Nguyen, T., Bajwa, A.A., Navie, S., O’Donnell, C. and Adkins, S. (2017). Parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) and climate change: the effect of CO2 concentration, temperature, and water deficit on growth and reproduction of two biotypes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24, 10727–10739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oudhia, P. (2000). Parthenium hysterophorus: a new weed in upland rice fields of the Chhattisgarh Plains (India). International Rice Research Notes 25, 34.Google Scholar
Oudhia, P. and Tripathi, R.S. (2000). Allelopathic effects of an obnoxious weed Parthenium hysterophorus L. on germination and seedling vigour of rice var. Mahamaya. Research on Crops 1, 111–115.Google Scholar
Paradkar, N.R., Kurchania, S.P. and Tiwari, J.P. (1997). Chemical control of Parthenium hysterophorus L. and other associated weeds in upland drilled rice. Indian Journal of Weed Science 29, 151–154.Google Scholar
Safdar, M.E., Tanveer, A., Khaliq, A. and Maqbool, R. (2016). Critical competition period of parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.) in maize. Crop Protection 80, 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safdar, M.E., Tanveer, A., Khaliq, A. and Riaz, M.A. (2015). Yield losses in maize (Zea mays) infested with parthenium weed (Parthenium hysterophorus L.). Crop Protection 70, 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamado, T. and Milberg, P. (2000). Weed flora in arable fields of eastern Ethiopia with emphasis on the occurrence of Parthenium hysterophorus. Weed Research 40, 507–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamado, T., Ohlander, L. and Milberg, P. (2002). Interference by the weed Parthenium hysterophorus L. with grain sorghum: influence of weed density and duration of competition. International Journal of Pest Management 48, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vivek, N., Rana, N.S., Singh, R. and Tomar, S.S. (2008). Effect of weed interference on weeds and productivity of black gram (Phaseolus mungo). Indian Journal of Weed Science 40, 65–67.Google Scholar