Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T22:48:39.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COLLABORATIVE MONITORING AND EVALUATION: ASSESSING THE UPTAKE OF IMPROVED FALLOWS AND BIOMASS TRANSFER IN WESTERN KENYA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2008

S. FRANZEL ,
T. NANOK ,
S. WANGIA  and
J. DEWOLF
S. FRANZEL*
Affiliation:
World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), P.O. Box 30677, Nairobi, Kenya and #x2021;Egerton University, Njoro, Kenya
T. NANOK
Affiliation:
World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), P.O. Box 30677, Nairobi, Kenya and #x2021;Egerton University, Njoro, Kenya
S. WANGIA
Affiliation:
World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), P.O. Box 30677, Nairobi, Kenya and #x2021;Egerton University, Njoro, Kenya
J. DEWOLF
Affiliation:
World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), P.O. Box 30677, Nairobi, Kenya and #x2021;Egerton University, Njoro, Kenya
*
†Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Few references are available on collaborative monitoring and evaluation, that is, how diverse organizations promoting similar innovations can together assess their efforts. We examined the experience of 30 organizations in working together in western Kenya, from 1999 to 2003, assessing their impact in helping farmers to adapt and adopt two soil fertility practices. While the collaborative process improved the flow of information among organizations, it did not reduce monitoring costs, but rather increased them. The process increased participating organizations' awareness of farmer innovations and the number being promoted. The process also contributed to the formation of a consortium among the participating organizations. We viewed the benefits of the collaborative approach as greater than the costs, but recognize that the resources for implementing such exercises may often not be available.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , January 2008 , pp. 113 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abbot, J. and Guijt, I. (1998). Changing views on change: participatory approaches to monitoring the environment. SARL Discussion Paper No. 2. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
Aluoch, G., Noordin, Q. and Franzel, S. (2000). Joint Development of a Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation Methodology for Agroforestry-based Innovations in Western Kenya. Proceedings of a workshop held at DTC ActionAid Centre, Kiboswa, Kenya, 29 November to 1 December 1999. Nairobi: International Centre for Research in Agroforestry.Google Scholar
Amadalo, B., Jama, B., Nang, A., Noordin, Q., Nyasimi, M., Place, F., Franzel, S. and Beniest, J. (2003). Improved Fallows for Western Kenya: Extension Guideline. Nairobi: International Centre for Research in Agroforestry.Google Scholar
Barrett, C. B., Place, F. and Aboud, A. A. (2002). Natural Resources Management in African Agriculture: Understanding and Improving Current Practices. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
DeWolf, J., Rommelse, R. and Pisanelli, A. (2000). Improved Fallow Technology in Western Kenya: Potential and Reception by Farmers. Nairobi: International Centre for Research in Agroforestry.Google Scholar
Estrella, M., Blauert, J., Campilan, D., Gaventa, J., Gonsalves, J., Guijt, I., Johnson, D. and Ricafort, R. (2000). Learning from change: Issues and experiences in participatory monitoring and evaluation. Participation in Development Series No. xiv. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.Google Scholar
Franzel, S. and Scherr, S. (2002). Trees on the Farm: Assessing the Adoption Potential of Agroforestry Practices in Africa. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Franzel, S., Coe, R., Cooper, P., Place, F. and Scherr, S. J. (2001). Assessing the adoption potential of agroforestry practices in Subsaharan Africa. Agricultural Systems 69:37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathumbi, S. M., Cadisch, G. and Giller, K. E. (2004). Improved fallows: effects of species interaction on growth and productivity in monoculture and mixed stands. Forest Ecology and Management 187:267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jama, B., Palm, C. A., Buresh, R. J., Niang, A., Gachengo, C., Nziguheba, G. and Amadalo, B. (2000). Tithonia diversifolia as a green manure for soil fertility improvement in Western Kenya: a review. Agroforestry Systems 49:201–221.Google Scholar
Katanga, R., Phiri, D., Böhringer, A., and Mafongoya, P. (2002). The adaptive research and dissemination network for agroforestry: a synthesis of the adaptive workshops. In Proceedings of the 14th Southern Africa Regional Review and Planning Workshop, 3–7 September 2001 Harare, 93–99. (Eds Kwesiga, F., Ayuk, E. and Agumya, A.). Harare, Zimbabwe: International Centre for Research in Agroforestry.Google Scholar
Kiptot, E., Franzel, S., Hebinck, P. and Richards, P. (2006). Sharing seed and knowledge: farmer to farmer dissemination of agroforestry technologies in western Kenya. Agroforestry Systems 68:167–180.Google Scholar
Kristjanson, P., Place, F., Franzel, S. and Thornton, P. K. (2002). Assessing research impact on poverty: the importance of farmers' perspectives. Agricultural Systems 72:73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Njui, A. and Wambwile, E. (2003). Proceedings of the Consortium for Scaling Up Options for Increased Agricultural Productivity Annual Stakeholders Meeting, Imperial Hotel, Kisumu, Kenya, 28th March 2003. Nairobi: International Centre for Research in Agroforestry.Google Scholar
Obonyo, E. A. (2002). Adoption potential of biomass transfer technology in western Kenya. MPhil thesis. Kumasi, Ghana: University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
Ohlsson, E., Shepherd, K. D. and David, S. (1998). A study of farmers' soil fertility management practices on small-scale mixed farms in western Kenya. Interna Publikationer 25, Institutionen for Vaxtodlingslara. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.Google Scholar
Pisanelli, A., Franzel, S., DeWolf, J., Rommelse, R. and Poole, J. (2002). The Adoption of Improved Tree Fallows in Western Kenya: Farmer Practices, Knowledge, and Perception. Nairobi: International Centre for Research in Agroforestry.Google Scholar
Place, F., Franzel, S., DeWolf, J., Rommelse, R., Kwesiga, F., Niang, A. and Jama, B. (2002). Agroforestry for soil fertility replenishment: evidence on adoption processes in Kenya and Zambia. In Natural Resources Management in African Agriculture: Understanding and Improving Current Practices, 155–168. (Eds Barrett, C. B., Place, F. and Aboud, A. A.). Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.Google Scholar
Place, F., Adato, M., Hebinck, P. and Omosa, M. (2004). The impact of agroforestry based soil fertility replenishment practices on the poor in western Kenya. Standing Panel on Impact Assessment (SPIA)/IFPRI Project on the Impact of Agricultural Research on Poverty. Case Study 6: ICRAF Case Study in Kenya. Washington, DC: World Agroforestry Centre and IFPRI.Google Scholar
Rommelse, R. (2001). Economic assessment of biomass transfer and improved fallow trials in western Kenya. Natural Resource Problems, Priorities and Policies Programme Working Paper 2001–3. Nairobi: International Centre for Research in Agroforestry.Google Scholar