Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T18:21:50.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Switzerland—a paradigm for Europe?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Bruno S. Frey  and
Iris Bohnet
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Learning from the Swiss experience, this article argues that federalism and direct democracy are effective mechanisms for dealing with the diversity of interests, languages, cultures and religions in Europe. These institutions only partly harmonize economic, social and cultural politics. By far more important is that federalism and referenda foster competition between the various interests, but do so within a well-defined basic constitutional design so that competition produces beneficial effects. Federalism is not an alternative to referenda but rather a prerequisite for the effective working of a direct democracy. In small communities, the information cost of voters deciding on issues or judging representatives' performance are much lower than in a large jurisdiction. The more fiscal equivalence is guaranteed, the better the benefits of publicly supplied goods can be acknowledged and the corresponding costs be attributed to the relevant political programmes or actors. Thus, while federalism provides for cheaper information, referenda enable citizens to use this knowledge effectively in the political process. The interdependence of federalism and referenda also works the other way around: referenda improve the working of federalism. Besides the possibility of voting with their feet, citizens may also vote directly. This represents a double incentive for politicians to take their citizens' preferences into account; otherwise, they may lose their tax base to another jurisdiction or may be forced by referenda and initiatives to meet the demands of the voters.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Review , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , October 1995 , pp. 287 - 294
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Casella, A. and Frey, B. S. (1992) Federalism and clubs: towards an economic theory of overlapping political jurisdictions. Eur. Economic Rev. 36, 639–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Frey, B. S. (1986) International Political Economy. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
3.Kirchgässner, G. and Pommerehne, W. W. (1993) Tax harmonization and tax competition in the European community: lessons from Switzerland. Paper presented at the ISPE-Meeting, Linz/Austria, 19–21 August.Google Scholar
4.Eichenberger, R. (1994) The benefits of federalism and the risk of overcentralization. Kyklos 47, 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Cronin, T. E. (1989) Direct Democracy, The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Möckli, S. (1994) Direkte Demokratie. Ein internationaler Vergleich. Haupt, Bern, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
7.Butler, D. and Ranney, A. (eds) (1994) Referendums Around the World. AEI Press, Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Magleby, D. B. (1984) Direct Legislation. Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
9.The Economist (1993) Government in California: buckling under the strain. 13 February, 19–22.Google Scholar
10.Beedham, B. (1993) A better way to vote. The Economist 11 09, 7–10.Google Scholar
11.Bohnet, I. and Frey, B. S. (1994) Direct-democratic rules: the role of discussion. Kyklos 47, 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.The Economist (1990) A survey of California. 13 02, 21.Google Scholar
13.Pommerehne, W. W. and Frey, S. B. (1992) The effects of tax administration on tax morale.Paper presented at the ‘Conference on Tax Administration and Tax Evasion of the International Seminar in Public Economics (ISPE)’.El Escorial.Google Scholar
14.Frey, B. S. and Eichenberger, R. (1995) Competition among Jurisdictions: the Idea of FOCJ.Paper presented at the Friedrich-August-von Hajek-Symposium.Bleibach.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Vaubel, R. (1994) The political economic of centralization and the European Community. Public Choice 81, 151–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.European Constitutional Group (1993) A European Constitutional Settlement (Draft) London.Google Scholar
17.Hernan, F. (1994) Zweiter Bericht des Institutionellen Ausschusses über die Verfassung der Europäischen Union. European Parliament, Documents A3–0064/94.Google Scholar
18.Adonis, A. and Jones, S. (1991) Subsidiarity and the European community's constitutional future. Staats-wissenschaft und Staatpraxis 2, 179–196.Google Scholar
19.Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) (1993) Making Sense of Subsidiarity: How Much Centralization for Europe? CEPR, London.Google Scholar
20.Buchanan, J. M. (1991) An American perspective on Europe's constitutional opportunity. Cato Journal 10, 619–629.Google Scholar