No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Some reflections on ideology and scientific research
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2009
Abstract
After defining the characteristics of ideological knowledge and knowledge based on research, the experimental work on illusory correlations, serial effects, difficulties in ‘grasping counterexamples’ and prejudiced pseudo-knowledge is reported. This proves how ideology can develop from the very functioning of the cognitive processes (perception, thought) when it is not kept under critical scrutiny. The difference between ideological and scientific thought reflects the different social conditions behind the production of the two types of knowledge. The production of scientific knowledge is regulated by specific rules such as the logic of the experimental method and empirical references, and is animated by a depressive attitude (“I am responsible for matters within the confines of rules set by the research community’) while the propositions of ideology are antiempirical, shy away from counterexamples, are confusional, and are underpinned by an attitude that is potentially maniacal and omnipotent. The ideological factors that can have an effect on professional research are listed and it is shown how the results of this, once controlled, lose all ties to the ideology they may have been inspired by, to the extent that they constitute another sphere that is completely autonomous and independent.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Academia Europaea 1996
References
REFERENCES
1.Battacchi, M. W. (1980) Ideologia e scienza nella psicologia del pregiudizio, in I condizionamenti Ideologici della Psicologia di G. Siri, pp. 51–73. Vita e Pensiero, Milano.Google Scholar
2.Chapman, L. J. (1967) Illusory correlation in observational report. J. Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 6, 151–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Chapman, L. J. and Chapman, J. P. (1967) Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations. J. Abnormal Psychology 72, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Chapman, L. J. and Chapman, J. P. (1969) Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs. J. Abnormal Psychology 74, 271–280.Google Scholar
5.Golding, S. L. and Rover, L. G. (1972) Illusory correlation and subjective judgement. J. Abnormal Psychology 80, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Starrm, B. J. and Katkin, E. S. (1969) The clinician as an aberrant actuary: illusory correlation and the incomplete sentence blank. J. Abnormal Psychology 74, 670.Google Scholar
7.Hamilton, D. L. and Gifford, R. K. (1976) Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: a cognitive bases of stereotypic judgements. J. Experimental Social Psychology 12, 392–407.Google Scholar
9.Karmiloff-Smith, A. and Inhelder, B. (1976) If you want to get a head, get a theory. Cognition 3 (3), 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Canestrari, R. (1959) La psicologia del pregiudizio sociale, in Rassegna di Psicologia Generale e Clinica, IV, i.Google Scholar
11.Battacchi, M. W. (1972) Meridionali e Settentrionali nella Struttura del Pregiudizio Etnico in Italia. Il Mulinbo, Bologna.Google Scholar
12.Battacchi, M. W. and Giovannelli, G. et al. (1974) Il problema scolastico dei figli di connazionali emigrati nei paesi di lingua tedesca. Rapporto al Ministero, AAEE.Google Scholar
13.Canestrari, R. (1984) Alcune riflessioni su esperimenti, modelli e teorie in psicologia, in Teorie e Modelli 1, 1, 5–11.Google Scholar