Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:47:19.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Science: Where do we draw the line?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Pieter J. D. Drenth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Science is not taken for granted any longer. Society, politics and the media frequently pose critical questions tending to censorship or at least control of science. How does science react? On the one hand it cannot exist and develop without freedom: on the other hand this does not mean freedom to amass knowledge at any price and without restrictions. Thus, the scientist must balance freedom and ethical and social responsibility. This paper will reflect on the question of the limitations of science; who should control what and on which criteria

Type
Focus: Science and society
Information
European Review , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , May 1999 , pp. 239 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Shea, W. R. (1998) The epistemology of disillusionment with science. In: W.R. Shea and B. Sitter, Scientists and their Responsibility (Canton, MA: Watson Publishing International) pp. 189–202.Google Scholar
2.Elkana, Y (1989) The epistemology of the opposition to science. In W.R. Shea and B. Sitter, Scientists and their Responsibility (Canton, MA: Watson Publishing International) pp. 171–188.Google Scholar
3. Wetenschap cultuur en Samenleving, jan/febr. issue, 1997.Google Scholar
4.Hulspas, M. and Nienhuys, I. W. (1997) Tussen waarheid en waanzin: een encyclopedie der pseudo-wetenschappen (Utrecht: Scheffers).Google Scholar
5.Wolpert, L. (1999) Is science dangerous? In P.J.D. Drenth, JE. Fenstad and J. Schiereck, Science and Scientists Between Freedom and Responsibility (Luxembourg: Publication Office EC).Google Scholar
6.European Commission (1997) Proposal for the 5th Framework Programme 1998–2000 (Brussels: DG XII).Google Scholar
7.Drenth, P.J.D. (1996) Psychology as a science: truthful or useful? European Psychologist, 1, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.McLaren, A. (1999) The ethical dilemma: the living world. In: P.J.D. Drenth, J.E. Fenstad and J. Schiereck, Science and Scientists Between Freedom and Responsibility (Luxembourg: Publication Office EC).Google Scholar