Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:18:04.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Probing leviathan: the eastern enlargement of the European Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Miroslav N. Jovanović
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is an official enthusiasm about the eastern enlargement of the EU. A select group of advanced transition countries (the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Hungary and Poland) may enter the EU in the future. Nonetheless, the cost of the eastern (to a large extent agricultural) enlargement is not fully understood. That holds true both for the applicant countries and the EU. The actual costs could be assessed following the end of the seventh Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) that was supposed to prepare the EU for the coming decades. At the same time, the IGC was expected to set the final terms of entry. No matter how settled, the eastern enlargement will be very costly, the EU will have to ‘pay’ for the cohesion and agriculture, while the applicant countries will have to implement acquis communautaire. The accepted countries could not expect to be fully absorbed into the EU before 2015! An arrangement such as the European Economic Space (full membership minus agriculture, minus labour mobility and minus regional funds) may be a more workable solution for the transition countries, and for the EU. Full membership may be necessary in the end as the foundation of European integration is the preservation of peace and liberty in Europe. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Review , Volume 5 , Issue 4 , October 1997 , pp. 353 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.UN/ECE (1994) Economic Survey of Europe in 1993–1994, New York, United Nations.Google Scholar
2.van Brabant, J. (1996) Remaking Europe—the accession of transition economies. Economia Internazionale, 507–531.Google Scholar
3.Baldwin, R. (1995) The eastern enlargement of the European Union. European Economic Review, 474–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.CEPR (1992) Is Bigger Better? The Economics of EC Enlargement, London, Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
5.Davenport, M. (1995) Fostering integration of countries in transition in central and eastern Europe in the world economy and the implications for the developing countries. UNCTAD, ITD/7, 31 October 1995.Google Scholar
Inotai, A. (1995) The transforming economies of central and eastern Europe. World Policy Journal, 98–108.Google Scholar
Jovanović, M. (1997) European Economic Integration: Limits and Prospects, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Jovanović, M. (1998) International Economic Integration: Limits and Prospects, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
Jovanović, M. (Ed) (1998) International Economic Integration—Critical Perspectives on the World Economy: Integration Schemes (Volume IV), London, Routledge.Google Scholar