Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:09:33.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Perpetual First Generation’: A Strategy for a New Minority – People Originating from Turkey in France

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Samim Akgönül
Samim Akgönül*
Affiliation:
University of Strasbourg, Institute of International Relations, Department of Turkish Studies, 5 allée du Général Rouvillois, 67083 Strasbourg, Cedex, France. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To investigate the identity attributes of Turkish people living in France it is necessary to consider ‘Turkish identity’, determine the stage of their identity building, and understand the role religion plays in this quest for identity. Considering the complex structure of Ottoman society and the multiple and dynamic properties of loyalty criteria, it is difficult to ascertain the definition of ‘Turkishness’ even in Turkey. It is probably not necessary to explain that this is even more difficult for Turks who are in the minority.

Type
Turkey and Europe: Cultural Aspects
Information
European Review , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , July 2016 , pp. 405 - 416
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1.Thiesse, A. M. (2001) La création des identités nationales (Paris: Seuil), p. 14.Google Scholar
2.Oran, B. (2004) Türkiye’de Azınlıklar, Kavramlar, Teori, Lozan, İç Mevzuat, İçtihat, Uygulama (Istanbul: İletişim).Google Scholar
3.Anderson, B. (2000) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London, New York: Verso).Google Scholar
4.Halbwachs, M. (1994) Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire (Paris: Albin Michel), p. 178.Google Scholar
5.Butler, K. (2001) Defining diaspora, refining a discourse. Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies, 10(2), pp. 189–219.Google Scholar
6.Deconchy, J.-P. (1980) Orthodoxie religieuse et sciences sociales (Paris: Mouton).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Dupuy, J. P. (2004) Vers l’unité des sciences sociales autour de l’individualisme méthodologique complexe. Revue du MAUSS, 24, pp. 310–328.Google Scholar
8.Sutter, J. (1991) Overture. In: J. Bauberot (dir.) Pluralisme et minorités religieuses (Louvain, Paris: Peeters), p. 2.Google Scholar
9.Mead, G. (1934) Herbert Mind, Self and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar