Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:18:07.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Party Patronage in Contemporary Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2008

Petr Kopecký  and
Gerardo Scherlis
Petr Kopecký*
Affiliation:
Leiden University, Department of Political Science, Wassenaarseweg 52, PO Box 9555, 2300RB, Leiden, The Netherlands
Gerardo Scherlis
Affiliation:
Leiden University, Department of Political Science, Wassenaarseweg 52, PO Box 9555, 2300RB, Leiden, The Netherlands
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Party patronage is generally associated with social, economic and political underdevelopment, and is hence seen as largely irrelevant in the context of contemporary European politics. In this article, we argue to the contrary, proposing that patronage reappears on the stage of European politics as a critical organizational and governmental resource employed by political parties to enhance their standing as semi-state agencies of government. In order to illustrate our main contention, we first define party patronage, disentangling it from other notions of political particularism that are often used synonymously in the literature. Second, we provide a brief overview of the literature on the past and present of patronage practices in Europe, arguing that rather than declining, patronage is still likely to be a relevant feature of contemporary party politics in Europe. Finally, we analyse the role of party patronage in the light of recent developments in several European countries, identifying three distinct patterns of patronage practices in the region.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 16 , Issue 3: The State of the Parties– Party Democracy in the 21st Century , July 2008 , pp. 355 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Piattoni, S. (ed.) (2001) Clientelism, Interests and Democratic Representation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Wilson, J. Q. (1973) Political Organizations (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
3.Goldston, R. (1977) Patronage in British Government. Parliamentary Affairs, 30, 80–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Piattoni, S. (2001) Clientelism in historical and comparative perspective. In: Piattoni, S. (ed.) Clientelism, Interests and Democratic Representation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
5.Müller, W. (2006) Party patronage and party colonization of the state. In: Crotty, W. and Katz, R. S. (eds) Handbook of Party Politics (London: Sage), pp. 189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hopkin, J. (2006) Clientelism and party politics. In: Crotty, W. and Katz, R. S. (eds) Handbook of Party Politics (London: Sage), pp. 406–412.Google Scholar
7.Kopecký, P. (2006) Political parties and the state in post-Communist Europe: the nature of symbiosis. The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 251–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Eisenstadt, S. N. and Roninger, L. (1980) Patron–client relations as a model of structuring social exchange. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 22, 42–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Kitschelt, H. (2000) Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic polities. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 845–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Stokes, S. (2007) Political clientelism. In: Boix, C. and Stokes, S. (eds) Handbook of Comparative Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
11.Lancaster, T. and Paterson, D. (1990) Comparative pork barrel politics. Comparative Political Studies, 22, 458–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.van Biezen, I. and Kopecký, P. (2007) The state and the parties: public funding, public regulation and rent-seeking in contemporary democracies. Party Politics, 13, 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Lyrintzis, C. (1984) Political parties in post-Junta Greece: a case of bureaucratic clientelism? West European Politics, 7, 99–118.Google Scholar
14.Weingrod, A. (1968) Patrons, patronage, and political parties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 10, 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lemarchand, R. and Legg, K. (1972) Political clientelism and development. Comparative Politics, 4, 149–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Sorauf, F. (1959) Patronage and party. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 3, 115–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Banfield, E. and Wilson, J. (1963) City Politics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
18.Scott, J. (1969) Corruption, machine politics, and political change. American Political Science Review, 63, 1142–1158.Google Scholar
19.Ware, A. (1996) Political Parties and Party Systems (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
20.Neumann, S. (1956) Toward a comparative study of political parties. In: Neumann, S. (ed.) Modern Political Parties: Approaches to Comparative Politics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
21.Katz, R. and Mair, P. (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics, 1, 5–28.Google Scholar
22.Shefter, M. (1977) Party and patronage: Germany, England and Italy. Politics and Society, 7, 403–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Sotiropoulos, D. (1996) Populism and Bureaucracy: the Case of Greece under PASOK, 1981–1989 (Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
24. G. H. Kristinsson (2006) Patronage and public appointments in Iceland. Paper Prepared for the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Nicosia, Cyprus, 25–30 April 2006.Google Scholar
25.Theobald, R. (1983) The decline of patron–client relations in developed societies. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 24, 136–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. P. Kopecký and P. Mair (2006) Political parties and patronage in contemporary democracies: an introduction. Paper Prepared for the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Nicosia, Cyprus, 25–30 April 2006.Google Scholar
27.Kopecký, P. and Mair, P. (2003) Political parties and government. In: Salih, M. (ed.) African Political Parties: Evolution, Institutionalisation and Governance (London: Pluto), pp. 275–292.Google Scholar
28.van Biezen, I. (2004) Political parties as public utilities. Party Politics, 10, 701–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Dalton, R. and Wattenberg, M. (eds) (2002) Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. N. Bolleyer (2006) Patronage as party resource – selective incentives and the generation of organizational support. Paper Prepared for the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Nicosia, Cyprus, 25–30 April 2006.Google Scholar
31.Panebianco, A. (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
32.Müller, W. (2000) Patronage by national governments. In: Blondel, J. and Cotta, M. (eds) The Nature of Party Government: A Comparative European Perspective (Basingstoke: Palgrave), pp. 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.O’Dwyer, C. (2004) Runaway state building: how political parties shape states in postcommunist Eastern Europe. World Politics, 56, 520–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Grzymala-Busse, A. (2003) Political competition and the politicization of the state in East Central Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 36, 1123–1147.Google Scholar
35. J. G. Christensen (2001) Political responsiveness in a merit bureaucracy. Paper Prepared for the 14th Annual PATNET Conference, Leiden University, 21–23 June, 2001.Google Scholar
36.Christensen, J. G. (2006) Ministers and mandarins under Danish parliamentarism. International Journal of Public Administration, 29, 997–1019.Google Scholar
37.Strøm, K. (1986) Deferred gratification and minority governments in Scandinavia. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 11, 583–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. M. Denton and M. Flinders (2006) Shrinking reach and delegated governance. Paper Prepared for the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Nicosia, Cyprus, 25–30 April 2006.Google Scholar
39.Page, E. and Wright, V. (1999) Conclusion: senior officials in Western Europe. In: Page, E. and Wright, V. (eds) Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States: A Comparative Analysis of Top Officials (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 266–280.Google Scholar
40.Pasquino, G. (1986) Modernity and reforms: the PSI between political entrepreneurs and gamblers. West European Politics, 9, 120–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41.Leonardi, R. and Wertman, D. (1989) Italian Christian Democracy (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Gillespie, R. (1994) The resurgence of factionalism in the Spanish socialist workers party. In: Bell, D. and Shaw, E. (eds) Conflict and Cohesion in Western European Social Democratic Parties (London: Pinter), pp. 50–69.Google Scholar
43.Hopkin, J. (2001) A ‘southern model’ of electoral mobilization? Clientelism and electoral politics in post-Franco Spain. West European Politics, 24, 115–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.Cotta, M. and Verzichelli, L. (2007) Political Institutions of Italy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
45.Papadopoulos, Y. (1997) Transformations of party clientelism in southern Europe in a phase of democratic consolidation. Swiss Political Science Review, 3, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46. T. Pappas (2006) Patrons against partisans: political patronage in mass ideological parties. Paper Prepared for the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Nicosia, Cyprus, 25–30 April 2006.Google Scholar
47. C. Jalali and M. Lisi (2006) Patronage and patterns of intra-party organizations: the Portuguese experience. Paper Prepared for the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Nicosia, Cyprus, 25–30 April 2006.Google Scholar
48.Mavrogordatos, G. (1997) From traditional clientelism to machine politics: the impact of Pasok populism in Greece. South European Society and Politics, 2, 1–26.Google Scholar
49.D’Anieri, P. (2005) The last hurrah: the 2004 Ukrainian presidential elections and the limits of machine politics. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 38, 231–249.Google Scholar
50.Birch, S. (1997) Nomenklatura democratization: electoral clientelism in post-Soviet Ukraine. Democratization, 4, 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
51. A. Gwiazda (2006) Party patronage in Poland: the democratic left alliance and law and justice compared. Paper Prepared for the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Nicosia, Cyprus, 25–30 April 2006.Google Scholar
52.Szczerbiak, A. (2006) State party funding and patronage in post-1989 Poland. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 298–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53. M. Spirova (2006) Political parties and patronage in Bulgaria: a case study of the 2005 ‘Red Sweep’. Paper Prepared for the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Nicosia, Cyprus, 25–30 April 2006.Google Scholar
54.Van der Meer, F. and Raadschelders, J. (1999) The senior civil service in the Netherlands: a quest for unity. In: Page, E. and Wright, V. (eds) Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States: A Comparative Analysis of Top Officials (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 205–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55.Goetz, K. (1999) Senior officials in the German Federal administration: institutional change and positional differentiation. In: Page, E. and Wright, V. (eds) Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States: A Comparative Analysis of Top Officials (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 147–177.Google Scholar
56.Morel, L. (1996) France: towards a less controversial use of the referendum. In: Gallagher, M. and Uleri, P. V. (eds) The Referendum Experience in Europe (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
57.Rouban, L. (1999) The senior civil service in France. In: Page, E. and Wright, V. (eds) Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States: A Comparative Analysis of Top Officials (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 85–89.Google Scholar
58.Meyer-Sahling, J. H. (2006) The rise of the partisan state? Parties, patronage and the ministerial bureaucracy in Hungary. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 274–297.Google Scholar
59. J. Ikstens (2006) Patronage as party building tool: the case of Latvia. Paper Prepared for the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Nicosia, Cyprus, 25–30 April 2006.Google Scholar
60.Kopecký, P. (2007) Building party government: political parties in the Czech and Slovak Republics. In: Webb, P. and White, S. (eds) Party Politics in New Democracies (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 119–145.Google Scholar
61.Müller, W. C. (1989) Party patronage in Austria. Theoretical considerations and empirical findings. In: Pelinka, A. and Plasser, F. (eds) The Austrian Party System (Boulder: Westview Press), pp. 327–355.Google Scholar
62.Liegl, B. and Müller, W. (1999) Senior officials in Austria. In: Page, E. and Wright, V. (eds) Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States: A Comparative Analysis of Top Officials (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 90–120.Google Scholar
63.Brans, M. and Hondeghem, A. (1999) The senior civil service in Belgium. In: Page, E. and Wright, V. (eds) Bureaucratic Elites in Western European States: A Comparative Analysis of Top Officials (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 121–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64. L. De Winter (2006) Sixty years of party patronage in the Belgian partitocracy: quantitative and qualitative transformations. Paper Prepared for the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Nicosia, Cyprus, 25–30 April 2006.Google Scholar