Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T12:40:41.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Big Data – Digital Technology, Loads of Empirical Materials, and a Daring Vision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2019

Christian Munthe  and
Urban Strandberg
Christian Munthe
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Linguistics, Theory of Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
Urban Strandberg
Affiliation:
Centre for European Studies, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, PO Box 720, SE-405 30Gothenburg, Sweden. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The daring vision of using big data technology to substantially advance the scientific understanding of human nature, individually and socially, and possibly solve age-old challenges of bridging the subjective and objective sides of human nature, rests on substantial assumptions about the concept of a human being. The daring big data vision may at the same time, in itself, serve to change the very concept of a human, regardless of how well the vision’s assumptions and prospects hold up to scrutiny. This issue of the European Review presents an attempt to critically engage with the question of how this complex situation affects the content and prospects of the vision of reconsidering humanity with the help of big data. In this introduction, the landscape of the issue is sketched and some general remarks of where the emerging map might take future research are made. In general, even if the assumptions of the daring big data vision turn out wanting, pragmatic factors may very well transform our own image of ourselves to fit it.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , July 2019 , pp. 317 - 327
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

Also belonging to the large-scale production of data is target-oriented fact-finding for intelligence, police and military purposes. This information will, at least not in the initial stage, be available for research – although the methods used for the analysis and formulation of conclusions in these respective areas, may eventually manifest themselves in the form of publicly noticeable consequences for scientists to ponder.Google Scholar
See, for instance, the Big Data Surveillance project: http://www.sscqueens.org/projects/big-data-surveillance Google Scholar
Kullenberg, C. and Kasperowski, D. (2016) What is citizen science? – A scientometric meta-analysis. PLOS ONE, 11(1), e0147152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147152 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
In this way, Figdor’s analysis adds to existing initiatives in philosophical ethics to attribute moral status to non-human entities: expanding the concept of the human agent, person or subject may just as well take us in the opposite ethical direction, notwithstanding the fact that many philosophers would argue that such a development is irrational or implausible.Google Scholar
In 2017, Millikan received the Rolf Schock Prize in Logic and Philosophy for her work in this area.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar