Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:25:49.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International Justice for International Crimes: An Idea whose Time Has Come

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2006

WILLIAM A SCHABAS
Affiliation:
Irish Centre for Human Rights, The Law Faculty, National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

International criminal justice really began at Nuremberg in 1945, after an inauspicious start at Versailles in 1919. But little happened during the Cold War, and only in the 1990s, driven by a human rights movement that had refocused its energy on the rights of victims and concerns about impunity and accountability, did the efforts revive. The United Nations pioneered the activity, with three ad hoc tribunals. In 2002, a permanent institution, the International Criminal Court, began its operations. Concerns about the fairness of such proceedings have featured since the earliest days. In balance, both Nuremberg and its modern-day successors deliver acceptable judgments from a due process standpoint, although problems remain. Also troubling is an emphasis on convictions based upon paradigms that approach vicarious liability. This enhances the probability of conviction, but weakens the stigma of guilt and ultimately compromises the historical legacy. There is also a recent tendency to focus upon non-state actors, prosecuting rebels and terrorists rather than crimes of state.

Type
Focus: Crimes against Humanitarian Law: International Trials in Perspective
Copyright
Academia Europaea 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)