Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:06:51.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Humanism and linguistic diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Extract

Traditional humanism emphasized equal rights for all human beings, and consequently the similarity of human beings. Recently it has been pointed out that postmodernism, which can be considered as a modern humanism, focuses on the diversity of mankind. In this paper it is claimed that these two aspects – sameness and diversity of human beings – are both essential to humanism. The history of linguistics, which is closely correlated with the history of humanism, demonstrates that the focus has constantly shifted between uniformity (universality) and diversity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Sorabji, R. (1993) Animal Minds and Human Morals (London: Duckworth).Google Scholar
2. Erasmus of Rotterdam, Opera 1, 493C, quoted from Svendsen, P. (1980) Enhet og mangfold europeisk kultur (Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum) p. 274.Google Scholar
3. Cicero: Dc natura deorum. With an English translation by Rackham, H. (1933) (Harvard University Press I) Liber II, LIX.Google Scholar
4. op cit, p. 155, in particular.Google Scholar
5.De interpretatione, cap. I, in H. P. Cooke (1938) Aristotle, the Organon. Here quoted from Padley, G. A. (1985) Grammatical Theory in Western Europe 1500–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) p. 219.Google Scholar
6.Maierù, A.: The philosophy of language, in Lepschy, G. (ed) (1994) History of Linguistics, vol. II, (London: Longman) p. 281.Google Scholar
7.Budé, G. (1533) De Philologia, (Basel), p. 217, quoted from D. R. Kelley (1970) Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship (New York and London: Columbia University Press) p. 24.Google Scholar
8. See, for example, Kelley, D. R. op. cit. note 7.Google Scholar
9. Quoted from Grafton, A. and Jardine, L. (1986) From Humanism to the Humanities, (London: Duckworth) p. 147.Google Scholar
10.Bouwsma, W. J. (1988) John Calvin (Oxford: Oxford University Press) chapter 7.Google Scholar
11.Apel, K.-O. (1975) Die Idee der Sprache in der Tradition des Humanismus von Dante bis Vico (Bonn: Bouvier Verlag Herbert Grundmann) pp. 32 and 112.Google Scholar
12.Padley, G. A. op. cit. note 5, chap. 3.Google Scholar
13. Bouwsma op. cit. p. 115, B. Malmberg (1991) Histoire de la linguistique (Paris: PUF), p. 170.Google Scholar
14.Aarsleff, H. (1982) From Locke to Saussure. Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), p. 279.Google Scholar
15.Aarsleff, H. op. cit. p 110.Google Scholar
16.Facsimile, edition (Ferd. Dummlers Verlag, Bonn, Hannover, München, 1968). English translation by P. Heath (1988) On Language, with an introduction by Hans Aarsleff, Texts in German Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
17.von Humboldt, W., op. cit., p. CCVI in the facsimile edition, p. 146 in the English translation.Google Scholar
18.Brown, R. L. (1967) Wilhelm von Humboldt's Conception of Linguistic Relativity (The Hague: Mouton), p. 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Whorf, B. Lee (1956) Language, Thought and Reality (MIT Press).Google Scholar
20.Chomsky, N. (1972) Problems of Knowledge and Freedom (Fontana).Google Scholar
21.Chomsky, N. (1988) Language and Problems of Knowledge (MIT: The Managua Lectures), p. 52153.Google Scholar