No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Good government and the historian
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2009
Abstract
The main constitutions with which medieval and modern Europe has experimented in the search for the best form of government are surveyed: most of them have now been relegated to the museum of legal antiques. However, constitutionalism and parliamentarianism proved to be permanent and are still highly valued acquisitions. The merits of a written constitution are discussed. This is followed by a presentation of the role of the nation state and its present embattled status. Can the past tell us what the best form of government is and, on the basis of the ‘Weber-thesis’, is there a link between political freedom and economic prosperity? The American controversy on capital punishment shows how the interpretation of the Constitution by the judicature can be a matter of life and death.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Academia Europaea 1998
References
1.van Caenegem, R. C. (1995) An Historical Introduction to Western Constitutional Law (Cambridge) pp. 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, H. W. (1984) A Constitutional History of Germany in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (London and New York, 1984) pp. 164–240.Google Scholar
2.van Caenegem, R. C. (1993) Judges, legislators and professors. Chapters in European Legal History. 2nd Edn (Cambridge).Google Scholar
3.van Caenegem, R. C. (1991), Max Weber: Historian and Sociologist (London and Rio Grande: Hambledon Press) pp. 201–222.Google Scholar