Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T12:55:52.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Religion, Grammar and Style: Wittgenstein and Hamann

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2019

Maya Halpern
Maya Halpern*
Affiliation:
Barkan, Kfar Tavor 15241, Israel. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I claim that Wittgenstein was familiar with Hamann’s work, particularly with two of the latter’s original contributions: (a) the idea of transforming Luther’s concept of grammar into a critical philosophical and linguistic tool; and (b) Hamann’s use of a kenotic, impure style as a means to attain the humility his religious stance demands. I suggest that an understanding of Hamann’s style as a tool to achieve humility sheds light on Wittgenstein’s later refutation of the purity of the Tractarian style. As reflected in remarks published in collections such as Culture and Value and Public and Private Occasions, Wittgenstein – like Hamann – aspired to modesty not only in his private life, but also in his philosophical work, attributing it a religious significance. In this context, his later style of philosophizing, characterized by the use of everyday rather than metaphysical terms, the inclusion of impure concepts and humble examples, dialogue and fragmentariness, is a means to ‘dismantle one’s pride’, in the practice of philosophy conceived as ‘working on oneself’.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 195 - 209
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wittgenstein, L. (1980) Culture and Value, edited by G.H. von Wright in collaboration with Heikki Nyman, Translated by Peter Winch (Oxford: Basil Blackwell), p. 26e.Google Scholar
2. Wittgenstein, L. (1975) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, translated by D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness (London: Routledge), Preface, p. 4.Google Scholar
3. von Wright, G.H. (2001) Biographical sketch. In: N. Malcolm, Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 15.Google Scholar
4. Janik, A. and Toulmin, S. (1973) Wittgenstein’s Vienna (New York: Simon and Schuster).Google Scholar
5. Cavell, S. (1976) The availability of Wittgenstein’s later philosophy. In: Must We Mean What We Say? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 70.Google Scholar
6. Smith, R.G. (Ed.) (1960) J.G. Hamann, A Study in Christian Existence (London: Collins).Google Scholar
7. Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations, English translation G.E.M. (Anscombe: Blackwell).Google Scholar
8. Letter to Ludwig Hänsel, 10 March 1937 in L. Wittgenstein (2003) Public and Private Occasions, edited by J. Klagge and A. Nordmann (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield), p. 301.Google Scholar
9. Malcolm, N. (2002) Wittgenstein: A Religious Point of View? Edited with a response by Peter Winch (Routledge, Kindle Edition).10.4324/9780203046241Google Scholar
10. Monk, R. (1990) Ludwig Wittgenstein, The Duty of Genius (New York: Penguin), p. 366.Google Scholar
11. Hamann, J.G. (1760) Miscellaneous notes on word order in the French language. In: E. Haynes (Ed.) (2007) Writings on Philosophy and Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
12. Hamann, J.G. (1784) Metacritique on the purism of reason. In: E. Haynes (Ed.) (2007) Writings on Philosophy and Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 211.Google Scholar
13. Tuska, B. (2008) In Babel’s Shadow Language, Philology, and the Nation in Nineteen Century Germany (Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press), Introduction, p. 9.Google Scholar
14. Hamann, J.G. (1960) Cloverleaf of Hellenistic letters, in the translation of Ronald Gregor Smith. In: R.G. Smith (Ed.), J.G. Hamann, A Study in Christian Existence (London: Collins), p. 75.Google Scholar
15. Backer, G.P. and Hacker, P.M.S. (2005) Understanding and Meaning (Oxford: Blackwell), p. 226.Google Scholar
16. Haynes, E. (Ed.) (2007) Writings on Philosophy and Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), Introduction, p. xiii.Google Scholar
17. Hamann, J.G. (1960) Fragments. In: A Study in Christian Existence (London: Collins), p. 166.Google Scholar
18. Austin, J.L. (1962) Sense and Sensibilia (Oxford: Oxford University Press), p. 8: but does the ordinary man believe that what he perceives is (always) something like furniture, or like these other ‘familiar objects’ – moderate-sized specimens of dry goods.Google Scholar
19. Thomas, S. (2008) Romanticism and Visuality, Fragments, History, Spectacle (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar