Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T13:01:29.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Do as We Say, Not as We Do’: EU to Turkey on Roma/Gypsy Integration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2014

Hayriye Avara  and
Bruno Mascitelli
Hayriye Avara
Affiliation:
Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
Bruno Mascitelli
Affiliation:
Swinburne University of Technology, Faculty of Business of Enterprise, PO Box 218 Hawthorn 3122, Melbourne, Australia. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For many centuries, Roma/Gypsy people have been an oppressed and stateless minority. Until 1989 most Roma/Gypsy people resided in the former Central and Eastern European communist countries. After the fall of the Berlin Wall, the Roma/Gypsy became one of the communities that were regarded as a scapegoat for post-Communist society's ills. Despite much rhetoric to the contrary, Roma/Gypsy communities were not welcomed in the West and much of the persecution they endured in the East they saw repeated in the West. The European Union (EU) has sought to place Human Rights as a focal point of its approach in all matters including the issue of Roma/Gypsy communities. Since 2007, Romania and Bulgaria, two states with large numbers of Roma/Gypsy, have become members of the EU. In the last few years France (and Italy) have been cautioned on their expulsion of Roma/Gypsy people. Not only have these actions contravened the European Union charter on Human Rights, but just as seriously, France and Italy have actually expelled citizens who are members of another European Member State because they were Roma/Gypsies. Turkey, on the other hand, as the home of one of the oldest and largest Roma/Gypsy settlements, had for long periods of time subjected Roma/Gypsy people to a life of social and economic disadvantage. Recently this has changed, ironically as part of Turkey's EU accession process. The aim of this article is to explore and compare the actions of European member States (France and Italy primarily) on the question of Roma/Gypsy integration with their integration in future EU accession states such as Turkey. The EU's moral high ground with regard to minorities seems to be ruined by the deplorable behaviour of some of its member states on the question of Roma/Gypsies while Turkey, which has an uneven record on human rights violations, has shown greater, although contradictory concern for the fate of the Roma/Gypsies.

Type
European History and Society
Information
European Review , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 129 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Minahan, J. (1996) Nations without States: A Historical Dictionary of Contemporary National Movements (London: Greenwood Press).Google Scholar
2.Ceyhan, S. (2003) A case study of Gypsy/Roma identity construction in Edirne. Master's Thesis, METU, Ankara.Google Scholar
3.Marsh, A. (2008) Ethnicity and identity: who are the Gypsies? In: We Are Here Mart Matbaacılık Sanatları (Istanbul: Mart Matbaacılık Sanatları).Google Scholar
4.European Commission (2010) European Union and the Roma, http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=518&langId=en, accessed 2 January 2011.Google Scholar
5.Kolukırık, S. (2005) The perception of Gypsies in Turkish society. Sociological Research Journal, 8(2).Google Scholar
6.Ambrosini, M. (2010) Richiesti e respinti (Milano: Il Saggiatore).Google Scholar
7.Oprisan, A. (2002) Overview on the Roma in Turkey. Dom Research Center Journal 1, 7 (Fall/Winter 2002), http://www.domresearchcenter.com/journal/17/overview7.html, accessed on 1 May 2013.Google Scholar
8.Liegeois, J. P. and Gheorghe, N. (1995) Roma/Gypsies: A European Minority (UK: Minority Rights Group International).Google Scholar
9.Boursier, G. (1995) Lo sterminio degli ebrei durante la Seconda Guerra Mondiale (Milan: Studi Storici), 2.Google Scholar
10.Crowe, D. and Kolsti, J. (1992) The Gypsies of Eastern Europe (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe).Google Scholar
11.Kenrick, D. (1971) The World Romani Congress, April 1971. Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society, 3(4), pp. 101–108.Google Scholar
12.Hancock, I. (1997) The struggle for the control of identity. Transitions, 4(4), pp. 36–44.Google Scholar
13.Knight, B. (2010) New UNICEF report condemns German policy of deporting Roma children. 8 July 2010, Die Welt, http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,5775224,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
14.Fraser, A. (1995) The Gypsies, 2nd edn (Oxford, UK: Blackwell).Google Scholar
15.Davies, A. (2011) The Roma: Europe's continuing victims. Presbyterian Record, January 2011.Google Scholar
16.Simons, M. (2010) Rights panel criticizes France over Roma policy. New York Times, 28 August.Google Scholar
17.Kohn, M. (1996) The Race Gallery: The Return of Racial Science (London: Vintage).Google Scholar
18.Daley, S. and Minder, R. (2010) In Spain, an easier path for gypsies. The New York Times, 13 December 2010.Google Scholar
19.Fundación Secretariado Gitano (2009) http://www.gitanos.org/quienes_somos/, accessed 5 January 2011.Google Scholar
20.Milijanic, O. and Zaretsky, R. (2010) France and Gypsies then and now. The New York Times, 6 September 2010.Google Scholar
21.Krumova, K. (2010) Roma Gypsies – Sarkozy's unsolvable ‘problem’: as France gets tough on illegal Romas. President's motivations questioned, The Epoch Times, 24 August 2010.Google Scholar
22.Cossi, M. and Ravazzini, M. (2008) Rom in una metropolis e Noi, Ed. I (Milano: Jaca Book).Google Scholar
23.Sigona, N. (2010) Gypsies Out of Italy. In: A. Mammone and G. Veltri (eds) Italy Today: The Sick Man of Europe (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
24.EU Commission (2010) EU Commission Assesses Recent Developments in France, Discusses Overall Situation of the Roma and EU Law on Free Movement of EU Citizens. http://www.eu-un.europa.eu/articles/es/article_10133_es.htm, accessed 3 January 2011.Google Scholar
25.Euractive (2010) Commission Closely Following France's Roma Expulsions. 19 August 2010, http://www.euractiv.com/en/socialeurope/commission-closely-following-frances-roma-expulsions-news-496960, accessed 3 January 2011.Google Scholar
26.Connor, R. (2010). France under Fire over Crackdown on Illegal Roma Camps. 15 August 2010, DW Die Welt, http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,5911704,00.html, accessed 3 January 2011.Google Scholar
27.Kenrick, D. (1998) Historical Dictionary of the Gypsies (Romanies) (London: The Scarecrow Press).Google Scholar
28.Toktas, S. (2006) EU enlargement conditions and minority protection: a reflection on Turkey's non-Muslim minorities. East European Quarterly, 40(4), p. 489.Google Scholar
29.Hamrén, E. (2007) EU, Turkey and the Kurds (Stockholm: Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science). http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-6761 (accessed 1 May 2013).Google Scholar
30.The Economist (2006) Turkey's gypsies, fighting bulldozers. The Economist, http://www.economist.com/node/7798835, accessed 17 August 2011.Google Scholar
31.Danka, A. (2008) Institutional and legal framework for protecting Roma rights in Turkey. In: We Are Here (Istanbul: Mart Matbaacılık Sanatları).Google Scholar
32.Danova, S. (2008) Preface: We Are Here (Istanbul: Mart Matbaacılık Sanatları).Google Scholar
33.UPI (2010) Turkish PM Calls for Unity With Gypsies, http://www.upi.com/TopNews/World-News/2010/03/15/Turkish-PM-calls-for-unity-with-gypsies/UPI-71071268673565/, accessed 1 September 2011.Google Scholar
34.International Herald Tribune (2012) France Expelled Record Tally of Illegal Immigrants, 11 January.Google Scholar