Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:15:22.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Widlöcher's Depressive Retardation Scale and Montgomery Asberg's Depression Rating Scale: an inter-rater study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

F Lang
Affiliation:
Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Bellevue, 23, boulevard Pasteur, 42023, Saint-Etienne Cedex
J Pellet
Affiliation:
Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Bellevue, 23, boulevard Pasteur, 42023, Saint-Etienne Cedex
Y Postic
Affiliation:
Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Bellevue, 23, boulevard Pasteur, 42023, Saint-Etienne Cedex
JM Beau
Affiliation:
Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Bellevue, 23, boulevard Pasteur, 42023, Saint-Etienne Cedex
S Lancrenon
Affiliation:
Unité INSERM de statistiques, Pr Fermanian, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, 43 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
Y Blanchon
Affiliation:
Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Bellevue, 23, boulevard Pasteur, 42023, Saint-Etienne Cedex
L Chazot
Affiliation:
Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Bellevue, 23, boulevard Pasteur, 42023, Saint-Etienne Cedex
M Decrat
Affiliation:
Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Bellevue, 23, boulevard Pasteur, 42023, Saint-Etienne Cedex
M Marcon
Affiliation:
Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Bellevue, 23, boulevard Pasteur, 42023, Saint-Etienne Cedex
E Perrier
Affiliation:
Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Bellevue, 23, boulevard Pasteur, 42023, Saint-Etienne Cedex
MC Ouvry
Affiliation:
Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie, Hôpital Bellevue, 23, boulevard Pasteur, 42023, Saint-Etienne Cedex
Get access

Summary

To study the reliability of two depression assessment scales, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Psychomotor Retardation Scale, 30 patients with depression according to Feighner's criteria were evaluated, by two groups of raters: 5 were trained psychiatrists or psychologists, and 6 were untrained raters. The experiment lasted three months. The patients were recorded on video-tape by two psychiatrists who did not take part in the experiment, during pre-designed interviews. Each scoring was discussed by the trained group but not by the untrained group. The Kappa test and the sign-test were used for the statistical analysis of global and itemized results, respectively. Intraclass coefficient Q3 was applied to global scores. With regard to global scores, there was no significant difference among the members of the trained group, who scored higher than those of the untrained group; a significant difference between some of the untrained raters, induced a significant difference with the trained group. With regard to each item of both scales, reliability appeared to be slight to moderate, and there was no significant difference between trained and inexpert raters. These results are discussed and modifications are proposed to improve the consistency of the two scales. The authors emphasize the necessity for therapeutic trials to be conducted with permanent groups of assessors who continue training even outside of trial procedures.

Type
Original article
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bech, PGram, LFDein, EJacobsen, OVitger, JBolwing, TG (1975) Quantitative rating of depression states. Correlation between Clinical Assessment, Beck's Self-rating Scale and Hamilton's Objective Rating Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 51, 161170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulon, JM (1984) Une étude de reparamétrisation de l'échelle de ralentissement. Thesis no 13, Saint-Etienne, FranceGoogle Scholar
Feighner, JPRobins, EGuze, SBWoodruff, RAWinokur, GMunoz, R (1972) Diagnostic criteria for use in psychiatric research. Arch Gen Psychiatry 26, 5763CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fermanian, JLancrenon, SGremy, F (1979) “Comparison of several coefficients of agreement”, IFIP working conference: Evaluation of Efficacy of Medical Action” (Alperovitch, FGremy, eds) North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
Fleiss, JLNee, CMRichard-Landis, J (1979) Large sample variance of Kappa in the case of different sets of raters. Psychol Bull 86, 59745977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearns, NPCruickshank, CAMcGuigan, KJRiley, SA (1982) A comparison of depression rating scales. Br J Psychiatry 141, 4549CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lempérière, TLépine, JPRouillon, FHardy, PAdès, JLuauté, JPFerrand, I (1984) Comparaison de différents instruments d'évaluation de la dépression à l'occasion d'une étude sur l'Athymil 30 mg. Ann Med Psychol 142, 12061212Google Scholar
Maier, WPhilipp, M (1985) Comparative analysis of observer depression scales. Acta Psychiatr Scand 72, 239245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, SAAsberg, M (1979) A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br Psychiatry 134, 382387CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pellet, JBobon, DPMormont, ILang, FMassardier, A (1980) Etude princeps de validation française de la MADRS sous échelle de dépression de la CPRS. Reims 1980, in: Compte-rendu du Congrès de Psychiatrie et de Neurologie de Langue Française, Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
Pellet, JDecrat, MLang, FChazot, LTatu, PBlanchon, YBerlier, JM (1987) Description d'un échantillon de 300 échelles MADRS portant sur des sujets déprimés. Ann Méd Psychol 145, 170175Google Scholar
Siegel, S (1956) Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw Kogakusha Ltd, TokyoGoogle Scholar
Widlöcher, D (1983) Le ralentissement dépressif. PUF ParisGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.