Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:17:22.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The treatment of premenstrual syndrome with preparations of Vitex Agnus Castus (Chaste-berry): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

P. Schulte
Affiliation:
GGZ North Holland North, Treatment Centre for bipolar disorder, Alkmaar, Netherlands
A. Verkaik
Affiliation:
Acerta Pharma, Research, Oss, Netherlands
A. Kamperman
Affiliation:
Epidemiological and Social Psychiatric Research Institute, Research, Rotterdam, Netherlands Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Research, Rotterdam, Netherlands
R. Van Westrhenen
Affiliation:
Erasmus University Medical Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Research, Rotterdam, Netherlands Capri Cardiac Rehabilitation, Treatment, Research, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Five to 8% of women of reproductive age suffer from moderate to severe symptoms of premenstrual syndrome associated with substantial distress or functional impairment.

Objective

To determine the efficacy, tolerability and acceptability of Vitex agnus castus (VAC, chaste-berry) preparations for treatment of premenstrual syndrome (PMS).

Methods

After an extensive literature search all randomized controlled trials of VAC in women with PMS and/or premenstrual dysphoric disorder were included.

Results

We found 17 randomized controlled trials of VAC in the treatment of PMS of which 14 studies could be included in the quantitative analysis. All trials, except one, found the Vitex agnus castus preparation to be more efficacious than placebo, pyridoxine and magnesium for either total symptom score or individual symptoms or symptom clusters. Unfortunately, the majority of trials is hampered by a high risk of bias. The pooled effect of VAC in placebo-controlled trials was large (Hedge's g: −1.21; 95% CI: −1.53 to −0.88), but heterogeneity extremely high (I2 = 91%). We could not single out distinct factors that could explain this heterogeneity. The funnel plot and Egger's tests suggest the presence of bias over the full set of studies and effect sizes.

Conclusion

Although meta-analysis shows a large pooled effect of VAC in placebo-controlled trials the high risk of bias, high heterogeneity and risk of publication bias of the included studies preclude a definitive conclusion. The pooled treatment effects should be viewed as merely explorative and, at best, overestimating the real treatment effect of VAC for PMS symptomatology.

Disclosure of interest

P.S. reports personal fees from H. Lundbeck A/S, outside the submitted work. The other authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
e-Poster viewing: Women, gender and mental health
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.