Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:05:47.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time-on-task effect in trait anhedonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Stéphanie Dubal  and
Roland Jouvent
Stéphanie Dubal*
Affiliation:
Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, CNRS UMR 7593, 47, Bd de l’Hôpital, Pavillon Clérambault, 75013Paris, France
Roland Jouvent
Affiliation:
Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, CNRS UMR 7593, 47, Bd de l’Hôpital, Pavillon Clérambault, 75013Paris, France
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Dubal).
Get access

Abstract

The capacity to sustain attention was explored in a sample of anhedonic subjects according to the Chapman physical anhedonia scale. Sustained attention was determined by studying task-induced changes over the duration of the Eriksen response competition task [Percept. Psychophys. 16 (1974) 143]. Anhedonic subjects had longer reaction times (RTs), but missed no more targets than control subjects. Anhedonic subject RTs got longer with time-on-task (TOT) and displayed greater intra-subject variability. These results confirm those of a previous study indicating that anhedonic subjects may have developed a more conservative response strategy [Psychophysiology 37 (2000) 711] and suggest that this strategy may result in a more rapid decrease in energetical resources. Moreover, the greater intra-subject variability demonstrates the importance of assessing performance over time and its relationship to the variability of responses in the cognitive performance of anhedonic subjects.

Keywords

Affective neuroscienceAnhedoniaAttentionTime-on-taskPersonalityVariability
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 19 , Issue 5 , August 2004 , pp. 285 - 291
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 European Psychiatric Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baddeley, ACocchini, GDella Sala, SLogie, RHSpinnler, HWork ing memory and vigilance: evidence from normal aging and Alzhe imer's disease. Brain Cogn 1999;41:87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, RAWare, JRThe relationship between vigilance and monotonous work. Ergonomics 1966;9:109–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ballard, JCComputerized assessment of sustained attention: a review of factors affecting vigilance performance. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1996;18:843–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berch, DBKanter, DRIndividual differences. In: Warm, JS editor. Sustained attention in human performance. Chichester: Wiley; 1984. p. 143–78.Google Scholar
Buchanan, RWStrauss, MEBreier, AKirkpatrick, BCarpenter, WT JrAttentional impairments in deficit and nondeficit forms of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 1997;154:363–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Cadenhead, KKumar, CBraff, DClinical and experimental characteristics of “hypothetically psychosis prone” college students. J Psy-chiatr Res 1996;30:331–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, LJChapman, JPRevised physical anhedonia scale. Unpublished scale 1978.Google Scholar
Chapman, LJChapman, JPKwapil, TREckblad, MZinser, MCPutatively psychosis-prone participants 10 years later. J Abnorm Psychol 1994;103:171–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, LJChapman, JPRaulin, MLScales for physical and social anhedonia. J Abnorm Psychol 1976;85:374–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, JDServan-Schreiber, DContext, cortex and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychol Rev 1992;99:45–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condray, RSteinhauer, SRSchizotypal personality disorder in indi viduals with and without schizophrenic relatives: similarities and contrasts in neurocognitive and clinical functioning. Schizophr Res 1992;7:33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornblatt, BALenzenweger, MFErlenmeyer-Kimling, LThe continuous performance test, identical pairs version: II. Contrasting atten-tional profiles in schizophrenic and depressed patients. Psychiatry Res 1989;29:65–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornblatt, BAKeilp, JGImpaired attention, genetics, and the patho-physiology of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1994;20:31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, DRTune, GSHuman vigilance performance. New York: Elsevier; 1969.Google Scholar
Deaton, CJParasuraman, RSensory and cognitive vigilance: effects of age on performance and subjective workload. Hum Performance 1993;6:71–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drewer, HBShean, GDReaction time crossover in schizotypal subjects. J Nerv Ment Dis 1993;181:27–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubal, SPierson, AJouvent, RFocused attention in anhedonia: a P3 study. Psychophysiology 2000;37:711–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Earle-Boyer, EASerper, MRDavidson, MHarvey, PDContinuous performance tests in schizophrenics patients: stimulus and medication effects on performance. Psychiatry Res 1991;37:47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksen, CWEriksen, BAEffects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept Psychophys 1974; 16:143–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlenmeyer-Kimling, LCornblatt, BAA summary of attentional findings in the NewYork High-risk Project. J Psychiatr Res 1992;26:405–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, LOLMiller, GACompromised performance and abnormal psychophysiology associated with the Wisconsin–Proneness Scales. In: Miller, GA editor. The behavioral high-risk paradigm in psychopathology. New York: Verlag; 1995. p. 47–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisk, ADSchneider, WControl and automatic processing during tasks requiring sustained attention: a new approach to vigilance. Hum Factors 1981;23:737–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasher, LZacks, RTAutomatic and effortful processes in memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 1979;108:356–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazlett, EADawson, MEFilion, DLSchell, AMNuechterlein, KHAutonomic orienting and the allocation of processing resources in schizophrenia patients and putatively at-risk individuals. J Abnorm Psychol 1997;106:171–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemsley, DRAn experimental psychological model for schizophrenia. In: Häfner, HGattaz, WFJanzarik, W editors. Search for the causes of schizophrenia. Berlin: Verlag; 1987. p. 179–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Josiassen, RShagass, CRoemer, RStraumanis, JAttention-related effects in somatosensory evoked potentials in college students at high risk for psychopathology. J Abnorm Psychol 1985;94:507–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jutai, JWSpatial attention in hypothetically psychosis-prone college students. Psychiatry Res 1989;27:207–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahneman, D.Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1973.Google Scholar
Lenzenweger, MFCornblatt, BAPutnick, M.Schizotypy and sustained attention. J Abnorm Psychol 1991;100:84–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loas, G.Adaptation et validation française de l'échelle d'anhédonie physique de Chapman et Chapman (PAS). Encéphale 1993;XIX:639–44.Google Scholar
Mackworth, NH.The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search. Q J Exp Psychol 1948;1:6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthysse, SLevy, DLWu, YRubin, DBHolzman, PIntermittent degradation in performance in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 1999;30: 131–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mass, RWolf, KWagner, MHaasen, C.Differential sustained attention/vigilance changes over time in schizophrenics and controls during a degraded stimulus continuous performance test. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000;250:24–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, GA.Information processing deficits in anhedonia and perceptual aberration: a psychophysiological analysis. Biol Psychiatry 1986; 21:100–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirsky, AFLochhead, SJJones, BPKugelmass, SWalsh, DKendler, KSOn familial factors in the attentional deficit in schizophrenia: a review and report of two new subject samples. J Psychiatr Res 1992;26:383–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mussgay, LHertwig, R.Signal detection indices in schizophrenics on a visual, auditory, and bimodal continuous performance test. Schizophr Res 1990;3:303–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nestor, PGFaux, SFMcCarley, RWShenton, MESands, SF.Measurement of visual sustained attention in schizophrenia using signal detection analysis a newly developed computerized CPT task. Schizophr Res 1990;3:329–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuechterlein, KHReaction time and attention in schizophrenia: a critical evaluation of the data and theories. Schizophr Bull 1977;3: 373–428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nuechterlein, KH.Signal detection in vigilance tasks and behavioral attributes among offspring of schizophrenic mothers and among hyperactive children. J Abnorm Psychol 1983a;92:4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuechterlein, KHParasuraman, RJiang, Q.Visual sustained attention: image degradation produces rapid sensitivity decrement over time. Science 1983b;220:327–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuechterlein, KHDawson, MEInformation processing and attentional functioning in the developmental course of schizophrenic disorders. Schizophr Bull 1984;10:160–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obiols, JEGarcia-Domingo, MdeTrinchera, IDomenech, E.Psychometric schizotypy and sustained attention in young males. Pers Individ Dif 1993;14:381–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parasuraman, RDavies, DR.Varieties of attention. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1984 xii–xxiii.Google Scholar
Parasuraman, R.Sustained attention in detection and discrimination. In: Parasuraman, RDavies, DR editors. Varieties of attention. New York: Academic Press; 1984. p. 243–89.Google Scholar
Parasuraman, RHaxby, JV.Attention and brain function in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology 1993;7:242–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roitman, SLCornblatt, BABergman, AObuchwski, MMitropoulou, VKeefe, RSEet al.Attentional functioning in schizotypal disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1997;154:655–60.Google Scholar
Rosvold, HEMirsky, AFSarason, IBransome, EDBeck, LHAContinuous performance test of brain damage. J Consult Clin Psychol 1956;20:343–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueckert, LGrafman, J.Sustained attention deficits in patients with right frontal lesions. Neuropsychologia 1996;34:953–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rueckert, LLevy, J.Further evidence that the callosum is involved in sustaining attention. Neuropsychologia 1996;34:927–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rund, BROrbeck, ALLandro, NI.Vigilance deficits in schizophrenics and affectively disturbed patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1992;86:207–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutschmann, JCornblatt, BErlenmeyer-Kimling, L.Sustained attention in children at-risk for schizophrenia: findings with two visual continuous performance tests in a new sample. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1986;14:365–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmand, BKuipers, TVan der Gaag, MBosveld, JBulthuis, FJellema, M.Cognitive disorders and negative symptoms as correlates of motivational deficits in psychotic patients. Psychol Med 1994;24: 869–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, WDumais, STShiffrin, RM.Automatic and control processing and attention. In: Parasuraman, RDavies, DR editors. Varieties of attention. New York: Academic Press; 1984.Google Scholar
Simons, RF.Physical anhedonia and future psychopathology: an elec-trocortical continuity? Psychophysiology 1982;19:433–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simons, RFRusso, KR.Event-related potentials and continuous performance in subjects with physical anhedonia or perceptual aberrations. J Psychophysiol 1987;2:27–37.Google Scholar
Strandburg, RJMarsh, JTBrown, WSAsarnow, RFGuthrie, DHiga, J.Event-related potential correlates of impaired attention in schizophrenic children. Biol Psychiatry 1990;27:1103–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Bosch, RJRombouts, RPVan Asma, MJ.What determines continuous performance task performance? Schizophr Bull 1996;22: 643–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warm, JS.Sustained attention in human performance. London: Wiley; 1984.Google Scholar
Wilkins, SVenables, PH.Disorder of attention in individuals with schizotypal personality. Schizophr Bull 1992;18:717–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yee, CMMiller, GA.A dual-task analysis of resource allocation in dysthymia and anhedonia. J Abnorm Psychol 1994;103:625–36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.