Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:05:30.754Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Taking back control of the Data. Developing an all in one System to monitor training post quality and provide trainer feedback

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

J. Mudunkotuwe ,
M. Schmidt ,
A. Khan  and
T. Sahlsberg
J. Mudunkotuwe*
Affiliation:
Surrey and Borders NHS Foundation Trust, Neurodevelopmental Service, Epsom, United Kingdom
M. Schmidt
Affiliation:
Health Education England, Kent Surrey And Sussex, Psychiatry, Redhill, United Kingdom
A. Khan
Affiliation:
Surrey and Borders NHS foundation Trust, Medical Education, Epsom, United Kingdom
T. Sahlsberg
Affiliation:
ReportGorilla, It Consulting, Surrey, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

We will present experience developing a system for monitoring training placements in psychiatry and community paediatrics, and how this was expanded to provide an automated anonymised MSF for trainers for annual appraisal and will identify trainers in need of additional support and other post/training programme issues. The session will be of interest to educators and medical education leads with practical tips and lessons learnt over the last 8 years since the system was first developed.

Objectives

The system was also used to identify trainers in need of additional support and other post/training programme issues.

Methods

We used an electronic system to gain the infromation as stated in the introduction.

Results

Over the last 8 years we have collected data using this system. the results for our trust will be displayed annoymously but the system is the ficus of this presenation.

Conclusions

The advantages of the system are that it runs throughout the year (so covers each post and placement), has high trainee response rates, has no selection bias (compared with some other MSF systems) and the results are embedded within local quality systems and individual consultant appraisals. The data that the system collects can help provide robust evidence when investigating concerns that might only arise periodically (for example through the annual GMC trainee survey in the UK). We believe that this system will be applicable for doctors providing training in other countries and empowers the improvement of psychiatric training for the profession.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Keywords

SupervisorappraisaleducationMulti source feedback
Type
Abstract
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 65 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 30th European Congress of Psychiatry , June 2022 , pp. S849
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.