Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T03:27:20.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Study of the psychometric qualities of the Brief Social Phobia Scale (BSPS) in Brazilian university students

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

F.L. Osório ,
J.A.S. Crippa  and
S.R. Loureiro
F.L. Osório*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosciences and Behavior, Medical School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Avenida dos Bandeirantes, 3900, CEP 14048-900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
J.A.S. Crippa
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosciences and Behavior, Medical School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Avenida dos Bandeirantes, 3900, CEP 14048-900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
S.R. Loureiro
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosciences and Behavior, Medical School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Avenida dos Bandeirantes, 3900, CEP 14048-900, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +55 16 36022837. E-mail address: [email protected] (F.L. Osório).
Get access

Abstract

Purpose

To perform a psychometric analysis of the Brazilian version of the Brief Social Phobia Scale (BSPS).

Materials and methods

Hundred and seventy-eight university students of both genders aged on average 21.2 years and identified as Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) cases and non-cases was studied, with the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV being used as a parameter. The different instruments were applied in an individual manner in the presence of a rater and of an observer.

Results

The BSPS showed adequate internal consistency (0.48–0.88) and concurrent and divergent validity with the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) (0.21–0.62), Social Phobia Inventory (0.24–0.82) and Self Statements During Public Speaking Scale (SSPS) (0.23–0.31). Discriminative validity revealed a sensitivity of 0.88–0.90 and a specificity of 0.81(0.83 for cut-off notes of 18/19. Factorial analysis demonstrated the presence of six factors that jointly explained 71.79% of data variance. Construct validity indicated some limits of the scale regarding the diagnosis of SAD. Inter-rater reliability was strong (0.86–1.00, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The BSPS is adequate for use with university students, although further studies in different cultures, samples and contexts are still necessary.

Keywords

Social phobiaScalesValidityReliabilitySocial anxietyScreening rating
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , April 2010 , pp. 178 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier Masson SAS 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 3rd Ed. Washingtonn, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1980.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (APA). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th Ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1994.Google Scholar
Baptista, CA. Estudo da prevalência do Transtorno de Ansiedade Social em estudantes universitários. Dissertação (Mestrado). Ribeirão Preto: Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo; 2007.Google Scholar
Connor, KM, Davidson, JR, Churchill, LEet al.Psychometric properties of Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). Br J Psychiatry 2000;176:379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, KM, Kobak, KA, Churchill, LEet al.Mini-Spin: a brief screening assessment for generalized social anxiety disorder. Depress Anxiety 2001;14:137–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortina, JMWhat is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol 1993;78:98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crippa, JAS, Sanches, RF, Hallak, JECA structured interview guide increases Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale reliability in raters with low clinical experience. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2001;103:465–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crippa, JAS, Baptista, CA, Osório, FLAre there differences between early- and late-onset social anxiety disorder?. Rev Br Psiquiatr 29(2)2007 195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crippa, JA, de Lima Osório, F, Del-Ben, CM, Filho, AS, da Silva Freitas, MC, Loureiro, SRComparability between telephone and face-to-face structured clinical interview for DSM-IV in assessing social anxiety disorder. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2008;44(4):241–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunha, JAManual da versão em português das Escalas Beck. São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo; 2001.Google Scholar
Davidson, JR, Potts, NL, Richichi, EAet al.The Brief Social Phobia Scale. J Clin Psychiatry 1991;52:48–51.Google ScholarPubMed
Davidson, JR, Hughes, DL, George, LK, Blazer, DGThe epidemiology of social phobia: findings from the Duke Epidemiological Catchment Area Study. Psychol Med 1993;23:709–718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, JR, Miner, CM, De Veaygh-Guss, Jet al.The Brief Social Phobia Scale: a psychometric evaluation. Psychol Med 1997;27:161–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del-Ben, CM, Vilela, JAA, Crippa, JASet al.Test-retest reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV – Clinical Version (SCID-CV) translated into portuguese. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2001;23:156–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fachel, JMG, Camey, SAvaliação psicométrica: a qualidade das medidas e o entendimento dos dados. In: Cunha, JA. (Org.). Psicodiagnóstico V. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2000, p. 158–170.Google Scholar
Fleiss, JStatistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1981.Google Scholar
First, MB, Spitzer, RL, Gibon, M, Willians, JBWStructured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders – Clinican Version (SCID-CV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 1997.Google Scholar
Furmark, T, Tillfors, M, Everez, Pet al.Social phobia in the general population: prevalence and sociodemographic profile. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1999;34:416–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furmark, TSocial Phobia – from epidemiology to brain function. Dissertation (Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology). Uppsala University; 2000.Google Scholar
Geer, JHThe development of a scale to measure fear. Behav Res Ther 1965;3:416–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hair, JF, Anderson, RE, Tatham, RL, Black, WCAnálise multivariada de dados. 5th Ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman; 2005.Google Scholar
Hofmann, SG, Dibartolo, PMAn instrument to assess self-statements during public speaking: scale development and preliminary psychometric properties. Behav Ther 2000;31:499–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martín-Santos, R, Crippa, JAS.Transtornos de ansiedad en atención primaria. In: Solá, VP. (Org.). Abordaje de los problemas de salud mental en el ámbito extrahospitalario. Barcelona: Profármaco; 2003, p. 17–31.Google Scholar
Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS). Classificação de transtornos mentais e de comportamento da CID-10: descrições clínicas e diretrizes diagnósticas. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 1993.Google Scholar
Osório, FL, Crippa, JAS, Loureiro, SRInstrumentos de avaliação do Transtorno de ansiedade social. Rev Psiquiatr Clin 2005;32:73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osório, FL, Crippa, JAS, Loureiro, SRCross-cultural validation of the Brief Social Phobia Scale for use in Portuguese and the development of a structured interview guide. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2006;28:212–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osório, FL, Crippa, JAS, Loureiro, SRA study of the discriminative validity of a screening tool (MINI-SPIN). Eur Psychiatry 2007;22:239–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osório, FL, Crippa, JAS, Loureiro, SRTranscultural validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN): study of the items and internal consistency. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 31(1)2009 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osório, FL, Crippa, JAS, Loureiro, SREscala para auto-avaliação ao Falar em Público (SSPS): validação transcultural para o português do Brasil, estudo dos itens e da consistência interna em amostra da população geral de universitários. Rev Psiquiatr Clin 35(6)2009 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osório, FL, Crippa, JAS, Loureiro, SR.Instruments for the Evaluation of Social Phobia. In: Axelby, CP (Org.). Social Phobia: Etiology, Diagnoses and Treatment. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers; 2009c, p. 1–66.Google Scholar
Pollack, MHComorbidity, neurobilogy, and pharmacotherapy of social anxiety disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62:24–29.Google Scholar
Raj, BASheehan DV social anxiety disorder. Med Clin North Am 2001;85:711–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stein, MB, Walker, JR, Forde, DRPublic speaking fears in a community sample. Prevalence, impact on functioning and diagnostic classification. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996;53:169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, MB, Walker, JR, Forde, DRSetting diagnostic thresholds for social phobia: considerations from a community survey of social anxiety. Am J Psychiatry 1994;151:408–412.Google ScholarPubMed
Streiner, DLA checklist for evaluating the usefulness of rating scales. Can J Psychiatry 1993;38:140–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Streiner, DL, Norman, GRHealth measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 3th Ed. London: Oxford University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
Tharwani, HM, Davidson, RTSymptomatic and functional assessment of social anxiety disorder in adults. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2001;24:643–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vilela, JAA. Estudo da confiabilidade e validade da escala de avaliação de mania-versão modificada da Young Mania Rating Scale. Dissertação (Mestrado). Ribeirão Preto: Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo; 2000.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.