Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:51:20.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stalking and the Law – an Israeli Legal System Based Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

O. Asman
O. Asman*
Affiliation:
Multi-Disciplinary Faculty, Haifa University, Haifa, Israel

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Stalking may be defined as obsessive following (1) forcibly and continuously invading another's privacy (2)(3); behaviors which: are directed at a particular person; are felt by the object person to be unwanted and invasive; arouse fear and/or concern in the object person. (4)

Mester, Birger and Margolin(5) referred to 3 types of interventions in response to stalking:

police intervention, legal intervention and medical intervention . They also refer to possible mixed types of intervention strategies.

In this presentation we will relate to legal aspects of stalking, taking into account social, clinical and policy related considerations. A focus will be made on the 2001 Israeli law for preventing threatening harassment, and the main tools it provides a subject with: turning to court for an injunction, complaining to the police in case an injunction has been violated. Other legal tools will also be discussed – such as damages claims related to privacy infringements, libel etc.

In summary we will inquire whether these legal tools are effective in putting an end to disruptive stalking behaviors and to what extent should those legal possibilities play a part in an anti-stalking action plan for a stalking victim.

Type
Article: 0160
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 30 , Issue S1: Abstracts of the 23rd European Congress of Psychiatry , March 2015 , pp. 1
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015

References

Melloy, JRGothard, SAm J Psychiatry 1995; 152: 258–263Google Scholar
Pathe, MMullen, PEBr J Psychiatry 1997; 170: 12–1710.1192/bjp.170.1.12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pathe, MMullen, PEAm J Psychiatry 1999; 156: 1244–1249Google Scholar
Westrup, DFremouw, WJAggression and Violent Behavior 1998; 3: 255–27410.1016/S1359-1789(97)00023-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mester, RobertoBirger, MosheMargolin, JacobIsr J Psychiatry Relat Sci 2006; 43(2): 102–111Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.