Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:16:51.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sex differences in total brain volume in a cognitively unimpaired elderly population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

M. Buchpiguel*
Affiliation:
Faculty Of Medical Sciences Of São Paulo, Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medical Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil
G. Busatto
Affiliation:
Lim21 Laboratory Of Psychiatric Neuroimaging (lim-21), Department And Institute Of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
P. Rosa
Affiliation:
Department & Institute Of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
P. Squarzoni
Affiliation:
Lim21 Laboratory Of Psychiatric Neuroimaging (lim-21), Department And Institute Of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
F. Duran
Affiliation:
Lim21 Laboratory Of Psychiatric Neuroimaging (lim-21), Department And Institute Of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
J. Tamashiro-Duran
Affiliation:
Lim21 Laboratory Of Psychiatric Neuroimaging (lim-21), Department And Institute Of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
C. Leite
Affiliation:
Department Of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
P. Lotufo
Affiliation:
Clinical Research And Epidemiology Unity, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
M. Scazufca
Affiliation:
Department & Institute Of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
T. Alves
Affiliation:
Department & Institute Of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Although a large number of studies have shown brain volumetric differences between men and women, only a few investigations to date have analyzed brain tissue volumes in representative samples of the general elderly population.

Objectives

We investigated differences in gray matter (GM), white matter (WM) and intracranial volumes (ICVs) between sexes in individuals above 66 years old using structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

Using FreeSurfer version 5.3, we automatically obtained the ICVs, GM and WM volumes from MRI datasets of 84 men and 92 women. To correct for interindividual variations in ICV, GM and WM volumes were adjusted with a method using the residuals of a least-square-derived linear regression between raw volumes and ICVs. We then performed an ANCOVA comparing men and woman including age and years of schooling as confounding factors.

Results

Women had a lower socioeconomic status overall and fewer years of schooling than men. The comparison of unadjusted brain volumes showed larger GM and WM volumes in men. After the ICV correction, the adjusted volumes of GM and WM were larger in women.

Conclusions

After the ICV correction and taking into account differences in socioeconomic status and years of schooling, our results confirm previous findings of proportionally larger GM in women, as well as larger WM volumes. These results in an elderly population indicate that brain volumetric differences between sexes persist throughout the aging process. Additional studies combining MRI and other biomarkers are warranted to identify the hormonal and molecular bases influencing such differences.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.