Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:44:35.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Schizophrenia as social discourse: How do people use their diagnosis for social action?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Rahman Haghighat
Rahman Haghighat*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University College London, Mortimer Street, LondonWC1, UK
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail address: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

‘Schizophrenia’ can do things other than diagnose or stigmatize those so defined in that it can serve various forms of social action. Two hundred and fifty-eight randomly selected patients with an experience of schizophrenia and their relatives participated in the study of schizophrenia as social discourse. They used the diagnosis for political struggle and social leverage in such diverse forms as demonstration of the meaning of ‘a schizophrenic’, discursive intervention for ideological invitation, reclaiming personal worth (revalorization), solidarity with fellow patients and economic compensation. Despite the inherent value of the diagnosis in helping them get the right treatment, participants saw devaluing meaning in various designations for schizophrenia and, given choice, preferred certain formulations of the diagnosis over others in relation to their social discourse. To be effective, treatment models, service delivery and communication with patients must allow, interpret and incorporate their first person accounts (discourse) as a feature of their individuality and uniqueness in the therapeutic process. This is likely to increase their sense of wellbeing, empowerment and cooperation with the treatment.

Keywords

SchizophreniaSocial discourseLanguageFirst person accountsValueStigma
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 23 , Issue 8 , December 2008 , pp. 549 - 560
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier Masson SAS 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, .The psychiatric team and the social definition of schizophrenia Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendix, E.Linguistic models as political symbols: gender and the generic ‘he’ in english Orasanu, .Slater, M.Adler, L.Language, sex and gender: does a difference make a difference?. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 327 1979Google Scholar
Bolinger, .Language, the loaded weapon London: Longman; 1980.Google Scholar
Boulet, .Construction sociale du sens dans des entretiens d'ouvriers et d'ouvrieres Paris: Université Paris VII; 1985.Google Scholar
Cameron, .Verbal hygiene London: Routledge; 1995.Google Scholar
Cooper, R.Language planning and social change Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, .Class and class conflict in industrialized societyTranslated, revised, and expanded by the author. First published in German 1937 as Soziale Klassen und Klassenkonflikt in der industriellen Gesellschaft London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1959.Google Scholar
Edwards, .Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization Theory Psychol. 1991; 1 4515–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estroff, S.Making it crazy Berkeley, California: University California Press; 1981.Google Scholar
Foucault, .The archaeology of knowledge. Sheridan-Smith, A., transl.Google Scholar
Gergen, K.Realities and relationships: sounding in social construction Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1994.Google Scholar
Goffman, .The presentation of self in everyday life USA: Anchor Books; 1959.Google Scholar
Haghighat, .A unitary theory of stigmatization Br J Psychiatry. 178 2001 207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haghighat, .A Preventive strategy for schizophrenia: from primitive drives to development of a new societyGrispini, .Intervention for schizophrenic disorders. Rome: Giovani Fioriti; 2003. 130–158Google Scholar
Haghighat, .The development of an instrument to measure stigmatization: factor analysis and origin of stigmatization Eur J Psychiatry. 2005; 19 3144–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haghighat, .The development of the Brief Social Desirability Scale (BSDS) Eur J Psychol. 2007 www.ejop.org/archives/2007/11/the_development.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haghighat, .Littlewood, .How should we call patients who have schizophrenia? A sociolinguistic analysis Psychiatr Bull. 1995; 19 7407–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, .Acedia and sin and its relationship to sorrow and melancholiaKleinmann, .Good, .Culture and depression. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1985.Google Scholar
Labov, .Sociolinguistic patterns Oxford: Blackwell; 1972.Google Scholar
Laswell, .Politics: who gets what, when, how New York: McGraw-Hill; 1936.Google Scholar
Pateman, .Language, truth and politics Lewes: Jean Stroud. 1980Google Scholar
Richardson, .The handbook of qualitative research methods for psychologists and the social sciences London: BPS Blackwell; 1996.Google Scholar
Ritchie, C.Patient or client? The opinions of people attending a psychiatric clinic Psychiatr Bull. 24 2000 447–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, .Language in society: an introduction to sociolinguistics Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994.Google Scholar
Sacks, .Seeing voices Berkeley: University of California Press; 1989.Google Scholar
Sadler, J.Values and psychiatric diagnosis Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
Sapir, .Language Ency Soc Sci. 9 1933 155–169Google Scholar
Sapir, .Selected writings Mandelbaum, D.Los Angeles: University of California Press; 1963.Google Scholar
Stanghellini, .Ballerini, .Qualitative analysis: its use in psychopathological research Acta Psychiatr Scand. 117 2008 161–163CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, J.SCAN: Schedule for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry Geneva: WHO; 1992.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.