Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:03:22.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Schizoaffective Disorder: Evolution of the Concept

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

W. Homri
Affiliation:
Psychiatry C, RAZI HOSPITAL, Manouba, Tunisia
S. Ghozzi
Affiliation:
Psychiatry C, RAZI HOSPITAL, Manouba, Tunisia
I. Ben Romdhane
Affiliation:
Psychiatry C, RAZI HOSPITAL, Manouba, Tunisia
N. Bram
Affiliation:
Psychiatry C, RAZI HOSPITAL, Manouba, Tunisia
L. Mouelhi
Affiliation:
Psychiatry C, RAZI HOSPITAL, Manouba, Tunisia
M. Ben Bechir
Affiliation:
Psychiatry C, RAZI HOSPITAL, Manouba, Tunisia
R. Labbane
Affiliation:
Psychiatry C, RAZI HOSPITAL, Manouba, Tunisia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

Schizoaffective disorder (SAD) is one of the most challenging concepts with unclear boundaries and remains difficult for clinicians due to its instability over time.

Objectives

we aimed to set the socio demographic and clinical profile of patients treated for SAD and to identify factors influencing the change in the diagnosis from SAD to another mental illness.

Methods

we have analyzed 50 patients followed for at least 10 years and diagnosed as SAD on the basis of DSM-IV criteria.

Results

The first SAD crisis was severe in 40,8% of cases. Almost half of the patients had a pre morbid personality (48%). At the first hospitalization, diagnoses were as follow: in 32% of cases: Schizophrenia, in 28% of cases: SAD, in 26% of cases: a mood disorder. The schizoaffective disorder diagnosis was rectified in 2 cases. More than 4 years are required to change the diagnosis. A complete remission was observed in 40% of cases during intervals, as the evolution of SAD is cyclical. The prognosis was considered good in the majority of cases. The change of the diagnosis is correlated to the age of the onset of the disorder (p = 0,046), the quality of intervals (p = 0,01), the quality of the professional insertion (p = 0,018) and the prognosis (p = 0,003).

Conclusion

The heterogeneity of patients with schizoaffective disorder and the absence of operational criteria in the definition of the pathology lead to the incapacity to set SAD clear diagnostic criteria.

Type
Article: 1704
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.