Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T22:53:36.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

S55.01 - Course of psychopathology in putatively prodromal subjects in the EPOS study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

S. Ruhrmann
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
F. Schultze-Lutter
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
H. Graf von Reventlow
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
H. Picker
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
M. Neumann
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
R.K.R. Salokangas
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
M. Heinima
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
D. Linszen
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
P. Dingemans
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
M. Birchwood
Affiliation:
Early Intervention Service, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
P. Patterson
Affiliation:
Early Intervention Service, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
G. Juckel
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
A. Morrison
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
J. Klosterkoetter
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
the EPOS group
Affiliation:
all departments

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

One aim of the European prediction of psychosis study (EPOS) has been to evaluate the clinical course of putatively prodromal patients in terms of psychopathology.

Methods:

245 patients at risk for psychosis defined by attenuated positive symptoms, brief limited psychotic symptoms, a state/ trait combination or cognitive-perceptive basic symptoms was recruited in six centres in four countries. The Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes (SIPS) and the Bonn Scale for the Assessment of Basic Symptoms – Prediction List (BSABS-P) were employed. Follow-up was scheduled after 9 months (t1) and 18 months.

Results:

In total, 40 patients developed a psychosis (P). Compared to those without a transition (NP), P showed significantly higher SIPS scores at baseline. The same applied to the BSABS-P sub-scores 'cognitive perception disturbances' and 'cognitive motor disturbances'. The P sub-group developing psychosis after t1 showed no significant change of the SIPS positive (SIPS-P) sub-score or of any BSABS-P score from baseline to t1, whereas all scores improved in the NP group. At t1, SIPS-P and BSABS-P sub-score 'cognitive thought disturbances' were significantly lower in those later becoming psychotic.

Conclusion:

Patients at risk showing a transition to psychosis during exhibited a pronounced psychopathology at baseline. Also, the positive symptom scores did not significantly improve during 1st follow-up, whereas those patients with no transition during the complete follow-up showed an improvement of all scores. As EPOS is a naturalistic study, different treatments have been performed in a considerable portion of the patients and association with course awaits further analysis.

Type
9 April 2008 Symposium: EPOS - further results of the completed study
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2008
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.